Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A

The increasing popularity of academic social networking sites (ASNSs) requires studies on the usage of ASNSs among scholars and evaluations of the effectiveness of these ASNSs. However, it is unclear whether current ASNSs have fulfilled their design goal, as scholars' actual online interactions on these platforms remain unexplored. To fill the gap, this article presents a study based on data collected from ResearchGate. Adopting a mixed‐method design by conducting qualitative content analysis and statistical analysis on 1,128 posts collected from ResearchGate Q&A, we examine how scholars exchange information and resources, and how their practices vary across three distinct disciplines: library and information services, history of art, and astrophysics. Our results show that the effect of a questioner's intention (i.e., seeking information or discussion) is greater than disciplinary factors in some circumstances. Across the three disciplines, responses to questions provide various resources, including experts' contact details, citations, links to Wikipedia, images, and so on. We further discuss several implications of the understanding of scholarly information exchange and the design of better academic social networking interfaces, which should stimulate scholarly interactions by minimizing confusion, improving the clarity of questions, and promoting scholarly content management.

[1]  M. Collins,et al.  Computer-mediated scholarly discussion groups , 1995 .

[2]  Dan Wu,et al.  A study on Q&A services between community-based question answering and collaborative digital reference in two languages , 2013 .

[3]  David Ellis,et al.  A Comparison of the Information seeking Patterns of researchers in the Physical and Social Sciences , 1993, J. Documentation.

[4]  Kathryn Ley,et al.  National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology , 2012 .

[5]  Daqing He,et al.  Changing communication on researchgate through interface updates , 2014, ASIST.

[6]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. , 2002 .

[7]  J. Oh,et al.  Research agenda for social Q&A , 2009 .

[8]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[10]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[11]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[12]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Groups in Mendeley: Owners' descriptions and group outcomes , 2012, ASIST.

[13]  Tonyia J. Tidline,et al.  Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment , 2001 .

[14]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  LIS research on information sharing activities - people, places, or information , 2012, J. Documentation.

[16]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[18]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[19]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[20]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  Information sharing as a means to reach collective understanding: A study of design scholars' information practices , 2011, J. Documentation.

[21]  Lei Li,et al.  Answer Quality Characteristics and Prediction on an Academic Q&A Site: A Case Study on ResearchGate , 2015, WWW.

[22]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Investigating motivations and expectations of asking a question in social Q&A , 2014, First Monday.

[23]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community , 2014, Scientometrics.

[24]  E. Zhu.  Meaning Negotiation, Knowledge Construction, and Mentoring in a Distance Learning Course , 1996 .

[25]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Exploring Characteristics and Effects of User Participation in Online Social Q&A Sites , 2008, First Monday.

[26]  Don E. Schultz,et al.  The Death of Distance ‐ How the Communications Revolution will Change Our Lives , 1998 .

[27]  Jung Sun Oh,et al.  Groups in Academic Social Networking Services--An Exploration of Their Potential as a Platform for Multi-disciplinary Collaboration , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[28]  TsaiChin-Chung,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008 .

[29]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Developing a typology of online Q&A models and recommending the right model for each question type , 2012, ASIST.

[31]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Higher education scholars' participation and practices on Twitter , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[33]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network? , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Jannica Heinström,et al.  Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior , 2013, J. Documentation.

[35]  Daqing He,et al.  Eating disorder questions in Yahoo! Answers: Information, conversation, or reflection? , 2012, ASIST.

[36]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Daqing He,et al.  User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites , 2008, CHI.

[39]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  Question types in social Q&A sites , 2010, First Monday.

[40]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  Social Q&A , 2018, Social Information Access.

[41]  Ola Pilerot.  Information sharing in the field of design research , 2015, Inf. Res..

[42]  Judith B. Pena-Shaff,et al.  Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Frances Cairncross.  The death of distance : how the communications revolution will change our lives , 1997 .

[44]  Elizabeth Stacey,et al.  Interactive Television in Schools: An Australian Study of the Tensions of Educational Technology and Change , 2001 .

[45]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  The structure of argument patterns on a social Q&A site , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  Patrick J. Fahy,et al.  Patterns of Interaction in a Computer Conference Transcript , 2001 .

[47]  Daqing He,et al.  Mendeley group as a new source of interdisciplinarity study: how do disciplines interact on mendeley? , 2013, JCDL '13.

[48]  Jarno Hoekman,et al.  Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[49]  Cheryl Campanella Bracken,et al.  Practical Resources for Assessing and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Content Analysis Research Projects , 2005 .

[50]  Marko Wagner.  Scholarly Work In The Humanities And The Evolving Information Environment , 2016 .

[51]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Human Information Interaction: An Ecological Approach to Information Behavior , 2012 .

[52]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites , 2009, CHI.