Pitch Range Variation in English Tonal Contrasts: Continuous or Categorical?

The importance of pitch range variation for intonational meaning and theory is well known; however, whether pitch range is a phonetic dimension which is treated categorically in English remains unclear. To test this possibility, three intonation continua varying in pitch range were constructed which had endpoints with contrastive representations under autosegmental-metrical (AM) theory: H* vs. L+H*, H* with ‘peak delay’ vs. L*+H, and %H L* vs. L*. The prediction derived from AM theory was that the reproduction of continuous pitch range variation should show a discrete pattern reflecting a change in the phonological representation of tonal sequences and in the number of tonal targets across each continuum. Participants’ reproductions of each stimulus set showed continuous variation in pitch range, suggesting that pitch range is a gradient phonetic dimension in English conveying semantic contrast, similar to the formant space for vowels. Moreover, the gradience observed in productions across all parts of the pitch range suggests that contours within each series had the same number of tonal targets. The results support a version of AM theory in which rises and falls are usually comprised of two tonal targets, with strictly monotonic f₀ interpolation between them.

[1]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Some acoustic cues for the perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[2]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels , 1962 .

[4]  Andrea Weber,et al.  Finding Referents in Time: Eye-Tracking Evidence for the Role of Contrastive Accents , 2006, Language and speech.

[5]  Edward Gibson,et al.  A comparison of inter-transcriber reliability for two systems of prosodic annotation: rap (rhythm and pitch) and toBI (tones and break indices) , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[6]  Robert Hagiwara,et al.  DIALECT VARIATION AND FORMANT FREQUENCY : THE AMERICAN ENGLISH VOWELS REVISITED , 1997 .

[7]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. , 1997, Science.

[8]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  The Influence of Pitch Range, Duration, Amplitude and Spectral Features on the Interpretation of the Rise-Fall-Rise Intonation Contour in English , 1992 .

[9]  Frank Kügler,et al.  The prosodic expression of contrast in Hindi , 2009 .

[10]  Fang Liu,et al.  Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation , 2005, Phonetica.

[11]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Metrical representation of pitch register , 1990 .

[12]  C. Gussenhoven The phonology of tone and intonation , 2004 .

[13]  M.D. Vinegrad A Direct Magnitude Scaling Method to Investigate Categorical Versus Continuous Modes of Speech Perception , 1972, Language and speech.

[14]  John Kingston,et al.  Salient pitch cues in the perception of contrastive focus , 1994 .

[15]  Vincent J. van Heuven,et al.  Gradient and categorical pitch dimensions in Dutch: diagnostic test , 1999 .

[16]  Martine Grice,et al.  Leading tones and downstep in English , 1995, Phonology.

[17]  J. Pierrehumbert The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[18]  G. Bruce Swedish word accents in sentence perspective , 1977 .

[19]  W. Cooper,et al.  Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  D. Ladd,et al.  Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D. Ladd,et al.  Tonal Association and Tonal Alignment: Evidence from Greek Polar Questions and Contrastive Statements , 2006, Language and speech.

[22]  Kim E. A. Silverman,et al.  The timing of prenuclear high accents in English , 1987 .

[23]  Emily Q. Wang,et al.  Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2001, Speech Commun..

[24]  Peter Dennis Viechnicki Composition and granularity of vowel production targets , 2002 .

[25]  D. Burnham,et al.  What's New, Pussycat? On Talking to Babies and Animals , 2002, Science.

[26]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Auditory and Linguistic Processes in the Perception of Intonation Contours , 1973, Language and speech.

[27]  D. Crystal,et al.  Intonation and Grammar in British English , 1967 .

[28]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[29]  D. Ladd,et al.  Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents , 1998 .

[30]  M. Vanrell,et al.  Information-seeking questions and incredulity questions : gradient or categorical contrast ? , 2010 .

[31]  Yi Xu,et al.  Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0contours , 1999 .

[32]  F. Nolan Intonational equivalence : an experimental evaluation of pitch scales , 2003 .

[33]  J B Pierrehumbert,et al.  Categories of tonal alignment in English. , 1989, Phonetica.

[34]  D. House Tonal perception in speech , 1990 .

[35]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[36]  R. Collier Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English , 1969 .

[37]  Robert Ladd,et al.  In Defense of a Metrical Theory of Intonational Downstep , 1993 .

[38]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Implicating Uncertainty: The Pragmatics of Fall-Rise Intonation , 1985 .

[39]  D. Ladd,et al.  The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical? , 1997 .

[40]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  The Behavior of H *and L* Under Variations in Pitch Range in Dutch Rising Contours , 2000, Language and speech.

[41]  James L. Flanagan,et al.  Pitch Discrimination for Synthetic Vowels , 1957 .

[42]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Interpreting Pitch Accents in Online Comprehension: H* vs. L+H , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  B. Repp Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings , 1984 .

[44]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  An Experimental Study of Some Intonation Contours , 1964 .

[45]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  The role of perception in defining tonal targets and their alignment , 2000 .

[46]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  The role of pitch range in establishing intonational contrasts , 2014, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[47]  Catherine Anderson,et al.  Advances in prosodic annotation : A test of inter-coder reliability for the RaP ( Rhythm and Pitch ) and ToBI ( Tones and Break Indices ) transcription systems , 2006 .

[48]  Edward T. Purcell Pitch peak location and the perception of Serbo-Croatian word tone , 1976 .

[49]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[50]  Maria del Mar,et al.  A scaling contrast in Majorcan Catalan interrogatives , 2006, Speech Prosody 2006.

[51]  Greg Kochanski,et al.  Evidence for attractors in English intonation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Preaccentual Pitch and Speaker Attitude in Dutch , 1998 .

[53]  Oliver Niebuhr,et al.  Perception and Cognitive Processing of Tonal Alignment in German , 2004 .

[54]  Y Xu,et al.  Consistency of Tone-Syllable Alignment across Different Syllable Structures and Speaking Rates , 1998, Phonetica.

[55]  D. Robert Ladd Peak Features and Overall Slope , 1983 .

[56]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[57]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  F0 Peaks and Valleys Aligned with Non-Prominent Syllables Can Influence Perceived Prominence in Adjacent Syllables , 2004 .

[58]  J. O'connor Intonation Of Colloquial English , 1961 .

[59]  Sasha Calhoun,et al.  Information structure and the prosodic structure of English : a probabilistic relationship , 2007 .

[60]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  When intonation plays the main character: information-vs. confirmation- seeking questions in Majorcan Catalan , 2010 .

[61]  Sasha Calhoun,et al.  Phonetic Dimensions of Intonational Categories - the case of L+H* and H* , 2004 .

[62]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  Yi Xu,et al.  Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[64]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Discreteness and Gradience in Intonational Contrasts , 1999 .

[65]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Phrase-Final Pitch Discrimination in English , 2006 .

[66]  Oliver Niebuhr,et al.  Perzeption Und Kognitive Verarbeitung Der Sprechmelodie: Theoretische Grundlagen Und Empirische Untersuchungen , 2007 .

[67]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Crosslanguage Study of Vowel Perception , 1969, Language and speech.

[68]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  The phonetics and phonology of tonal systems. , 2005 .

[69]  Yi Xu,et al.  Fundamental Frequency Peak Delay in Mandarin , 2000, Phonetica.

[70]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  "Sagging transitions" between high pitch accents in English: experimental evidence , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[71]  Dwight L. Bolinger INTONATION AND GRAMMAR , 1958 .

[72]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  The RaP (Rhythm and Pitch) Labeling System , 2005 .

[73]  David Crystal,et al.  Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English , 1969 .

[74]  Yi Xu,et al.  Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions , 2005, Speech Commun..

[75]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Alignment of L and H in bitonal pitch accents: testing two hypotheses , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[76]  Laura Redi,et al.  Categorical effects in production of pitch contours in English , 2003 .

[77]  D. Ladd,et al.  Constant "segmental anchoring" of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  John Hart,et al.  A Perceptual Study of Intonation , 1990 .

[79]  Oliver Niebuhr,et al.  Perceptual study of timing variables in F0 peaks , 2003 .

[80]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  Effects of pitch range variation on f0 extrema in an imitation task , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[81]  K. Pike,et al.  The intonation of American English , 1946 .

[82]  Oliver Niebuhr,et al.  The Signalling of German Rising-Falling Intonation Categories – The Interplay of Synchronization, Shape, and Height , 2007, Phonetica.