A data-driven approach for quality assessment of radiologic interpretations

Given the increasing emphasis on delivering high-quality, cost-efficient healthcare, improved methodologies are needed to measure the accuracy and utility of ordered diagnostic examinations in achieving the appropriate diagnosis. Here, we present a data-driven approach for performing automated quality assessment of radiologic interpretations using other clinical information (e.g., pathology) as a reference standard for individual radiologists, subspecialty sections, imaging modalities, and entire departments. Downstream diagnostic conclusions from the electronic medical record are utilized as "truth" to which upstream diagnoses generated by radiology are compared. The described system automatically extracts and compares patient medical data to characterize concordance between clinical sources. Initial results are presented in the context of breast imaging, matching 18 101 radiologic interpretations with 301 pathology diagnoses and achieving a precision and recall of 84% and 92%, respectively. The presented data-driven method highlights the challenges of integrating multiple data sources and the application of information extraction tools to facilitate healthcare quality improvement.

[1]  David A. Ferrucci,et al.  UIMA: an architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment , 2004, Natural Language Engineering.

[2]  J. Elmore,et al.  Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  B. Monsees,et al.  The Mammography Quality Standards Act. An overview of the regulations and guidance. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  James P Borgstede,et al.  RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data , 2001, ICML.

[8]  M. Lacquement,et al.  Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  Catherine C Roberts,et al.  Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.