Application of Evolutionary Computation for Berth Scheduling at Marine Container Terminals: Parameter Tuning Versus Parameter Control

Considering a substantial increase in the international seaborne containerized trade volumes, marine container terminal operators have to improve efficiency of the processes inside their terminals in order to meet the growing demand. An efficient berth scheduling is of a high importance for the terminal’s performance, as it significantly influences the turnaround time of vessels. This paper proposes a novel Evolutionary Algorithm to assist with berth scheduling at marine container terminals that, unlike published to date studies on berth scheduling, applies a parameter control strategy. Specifically, an adaptive mechanism is developed for the mutation operator, in which the mutation rate is altered based on feedback from the search. The objective of the proposed mixed integer model aims to minimize the total weighted vessel service cost. A set of numerical experiments are conducted to assess performance of the developed algorithm based on a comparison against a typical Evolutionary Algorithm that applies a constant mutation rate value, determined from the parameter tuning analysis. Results indicate that the optimality gap does not exceed 0.80% for both algorithms. Furthermore, deployment of the adaptive mechanism for the mutation operator yields an average of 5.4% and 8.5% savings in terms of the total weighted vessel service cost for medium and large size problem instances, respectively, without a significant increase in the computational time.

[1]  Maxim A. Dulebenets,et al.  Models and solution algorithms for improving operations in marine transportation , 2015 .

[2]  Christian Bierwirth,et al.  A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Barbara Panicucci,et al.  An Integer Linear Programming Approach for Radio-Based Localization of Shipping Containers in the Presence of Incomplete Proximity Information , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Zhaohui Wu,et al.  Container Port Performance Measurement and Comparison Leveraging Ship GPS Traces and Maritime Open Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Weijian Mi,et al.  A Simulation Study on the Design of a Novel Automated Container Terminal , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Cristiano Cervellera,et al.  Predictive Control of Container Flows in Maritime Intermodal Terminals , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems , 1994 .

[8]  Gisele L. Pappa,et al.  Tuning Genetic Programming parameters with factorial designs , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  Akio Imai,et al.  Berth allocation at indented berths for mega-containerships , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Mihalis M. Golias,et al.  Berth scheduling by customer service differentiation: A multi-objective approach , 2009 .

[11]  Maxim A. Dulebenets,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages from enforcing emission restrictions within emission control areas , 2016 .

[12]  Mihalis M. Golias,et al.  Evaluation of the floaterm concept at marine container terminals via simulation , 2015, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[13]  Akio Imai,et al.  Berthing ships at a multi-user container terminal with a limited quay capacity , 2008 .

[14]  Akio Imai,et al.  Marine container terminal configurations for efficient handling of mega-containerships , 2013 .

[15]  Eren Erman Ozguven,et al.  Intermodal Freight Network Design for Transport of Perishable Products , 2016 .

[16]  Maxim A. Dulebenets,et al.  A New Simulation Model for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Yard Truck Deployment Strategies at Marine Container Terminals , 2016 .

[17]  Kees Jan Roodbergen,et al.  Seaside operations in container terminals: literature overview, trends, and research directions , 2015 .

[18]  Christian Bierwirth,et al.  A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Maxim A. Dulebenets,et al.  The green vessel scheduling problem with transit time requirements in a liner shipping route with Emission Control Areas , 2017 .

[20]  M. A. Dulebenets,et al.  The Vessel Scheduling Problem in a Liner Shipping Route with Heterogeneous Fleet , 2018 .

[21]  Akio Imai,et al.  Berth allocation with service priority , 2003 .

[22]  Birger Raa,et al.  The Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem Using a CP Approach , 2013, CP.

[23]  Simona Sacone,et al.  An Event-Triggered Receding-Horizon Scheme for Planning Rail Operations in Maritime Terminals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Lu Zhen,et al.  A Comparative Study on Two Types of Automated Container Terminal Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[25]  Eren Erman Ozguven,et al.  Vessel scheduling in liner shipping: Modeling transport of perishable assets , 2017 .