Post language and user engagement in online content communities

Purpose This study aims to uncover relationships between content communities post language, such as parts of speech, and user engagement. Design/methodology/approach Analyses of almost 12,000 posts from the content community Reddit are undertaken. First, posts’ titles are subjected to electronic classification and subsequent counting of main parts of speech and other language elements. Then, statistical models are built to examine the relationships between these elements and user engagement, controlling for variables identified in previous research. Findings The number of adjectives and nouns, adverbs, pronouns, punctuation (exclamation marks, quotation marks and ellipses), question marks, advisory words (should, shall, must and have to) and complexity indicators that appear in content community posts’ titles relate to post popularity (scores: number of favourable minus unfavourable votes) and number of comments. However, these relationships vary according to the category, for example, text-based categories (e.g. Politics and World News) vs image-based ones (e.g. Pictures). Research limitations/implications While the relationships uncovered are appealing, this research is correlational, so causality cannot be implied. Practical implications Among other implications, companies may tailor their own content community post titles to match the types of language related to higher user engagement in a particular category. Companies may also provide advice to brand ambassadors on how to make better use of language to increase user engagement. Originality/value This paper shows that language features add explained variance to models of online engagement variables, providing significant contribution to both language and social media researchers and practitioners.

[1]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions , 2010 .

[2]  Aaron Smith,et al.  6% of online adults are reddit users , 2013 .

[3]  W. Reinartz,et al.  Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in Customer Management , 2010 .

[4]  Victoria L. Crittenden,et al.  We're all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem , 2011 .

[5]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  Self-Referencing , 1989 .

[6]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[7]  M. Nair.  Understanding and measuring the value of social media , 2011 .

[8]  Micael Dahlen,et al.  Following the Fashionable Friend: The Power of Social Media , 2011, Journal of Advertising Research.

[9]  Ilaria Dalla Pozza.  Multichannel management gets “social” , 2014 .

[10]  Monle Lee,et al.  The Determinants of Email Receivers' Disseminating Behaviors on the Internet , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[11]  T. Sebeok,et al.  We Are Not the Same as You and I: Causal Effects of Minor Language Variations on Consumers' Attitudes toward Brands , 2012 .

[12]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[13]  P. Leeflang,et al.  Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing , 2012 .

[14]  Y. Seih,et al.  The benefits of psychological displacement in diary writing when using different pronouns. , 2008, British journal of health psychology.

[15]  Christian Schulze,et al.  Not All Fun and Games: Viral Marketing for Utilitarian Products , 2014 .

[16]  David J. Faulds,et al.  Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix , 2009 .

[17]  Bart de Langhe,et al.  Bilingualism and the Emotional Intensity of Advertising Language , 2009 .

[18]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[20]  Paul F. Nunes,et al.  The Continuing Power of Mass Advertising , 2007 .

[21]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites , 2011 .

[22]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009 .

[23]  E. Malthouse,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness , 2009 .

[24]  D. Ellis,et al.  Discourse Strategies of Competent Communicators: Selected Cohesive and Linguistic Devices , 1994 .

[25]  G. Miller,et al.  The effect of variations in Nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility , 1964 .

[26]  A. Lindgreen,et al.  Why Pass on Viral Messages? Because They Connect Emotionally , 2007 .

[27]  W. Wayne Fu,et al.  Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos' viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media , 2011 .

[29]  Lisa Werner,et al.  Mcquails Mass Communication Theory , 2016 .

[30]  SCOTT L. ALTHAUS,et al.  Agenda Setting and the “New” News , 2002, Commun. Res..

[31]  R. Brodie,et al.  Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis , 2013 .

[32]  Matthew Rowe,et al.  Mining and comparing engagement dynamics across multiple social media platforms , 2014, WebSci '14.

[33]  R. Shaw,et al.  Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns. , 1988, Journal of personality.

[34]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures Under Directed Processing Versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising , 2003 .

[35]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[36]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[37]  C. Ogan,et al.  The Internet as Mass Medium , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback , 1975 .

[39]  William J. McEwen,et al.  The Effects of Message Intensity on Receiver Evaluations of Source, Message and Topic. , 1970 .

[40]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Exploring the boundary conditions of expressive writing: In search of the right recipe. , 2008, British journal of health psychology.

[41]  S. Czellár,et al.  The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale , 2009 .

[42]  H. Lasswell.  The structure and function of communication in society , 2007 .

[43]  M. Burgoon,et al.  TOWARD A MESSAGE‐CENTERED THEORY OF PERSUASION: THREE EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF LANGUAGE INTENSITY1 , 1975 .