Predicting Homeowners' Approval of Fuel Management at the Wildland–Urban Interface Using the Theory of Reasoned Action

ABSTRACT Social science models are increasingly needed as a framework for explaining and predicting how members of the public respond to the natural environment and their communities. The theory of reasoned action is widely used in human dimensions research on natural resource problems and work is ongoing to increase the predictive power of models based on this theory. This study examined beliefs, attitudes, and intention to support the implementation of three fuel management approaches (FMA)—prescribed burning, mechanical fuel reduction, and defensible space ordinances—in three wildland–urban interface (WUI) areas in the United States. Besides factors prescribed by the theory, the influence of three additional explanatory variables was assessed: past experience, personal importance, and trust. Personal importance of a FMA was a consistently significant predictor of attitude toward that approach, and trust in an agency's implementation of that approach was also a predictor of intention to approve the use of that approach.

[1]  A. Bright,et al.  Situational Influences of Acceptable Wildland Fire Management Actions , 2004 .

[2]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[3]  S. Daniels,et al.  Research on Causal Attribution of Wildfire: An Exploratory Multiple-Methods Approach , 2004 .

[4]  A. Bright,et al.  A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues: A case study of wolf reintroduction , 1996 .

[5]  Alan D. Bright,et al.  The influence of balanced information on attitudes toward natural resource issues , 1997 .

[6]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Examining Social Trust in Fuels Management Strategies , 2004, Journal of Forestry.

[7]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[9]  J. Keith Gilless,et al.  Assessing the Benefits of Reducing Fire Risk in the Wildland- Urban Interface: A Contingent Valuation Approach , 1999 .

[10]  C. Vogt,et al.  The Effects of Integrating Advertising and Negative Word‐of‐Mouth Communications on Message Processing and Response , 1995 .

[11]  R. Bagozzi.  The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior , 1992 .

[12]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  THEORY OF REASONED ACTION , 2014 .

[13]  Raul A. Pinel,et al.  Theory of Reasoned Action , 2007 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[15]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Attitudes toward prescribed fire policies. , 1990 .

[16]  Jonathan G. Taylor,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Humans, Fire, and Forests: The Reemergence of Research on Human Dimensions , 2004 .

[17]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Application of the theory of reasoned action to the National Park Service's controlled burn policy. , 1993 .

[18]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[19]  D. Glickman,et al.  Managing the Impact of Wildfires on Communities and the Environment: A Report to the President in Re , 2000 .

[20]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action , 2002 .

[21]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Theory of reasoned action vs. theory of planned behavior: Testing the suitability and sufficiency of a popular behavior model using hunting intentions , 1999 .

[22]  Eija Pouta, Mika Rekola.  The Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Willingness to Pay for Abatement of Forest Regeneration , 2001 .

[23]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[26]  Pamela J. Jakes,et al.  Homeowners, communities, and wildfire; science findings from the National Fire Plan , 2003 .

[27]  M. Manfredo,et al.  The Influence of Attitude Accessibility on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: Implications for Recreation Research. , 1992 .

[28]  M. Brunson,et al.  Geographic Variation in Social Acceptability of Wildland Fuels Management in the Western United States , 2004 .

[29]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[30]  Christine A. Vogt,et al.  Fuel Treatments at the Wildland-Urban Interface: Common Concerns in Diverse Regions , 2002, Journal of Forestry.

[31]  Alan D. Bright,et al.  The quality of attitudinal information regarding natural resource issues: The role of attitude‐strength, importance, and information , 1995 .

[32]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .