EPD-NEMO: efficient PMIPv6-based distributed network mobility management

Current network mobility management protocols allow users to access broadband Internet while moving in vehicles or from vehicles to fixed locations without breaking ongoing sessions. These protocols rely on a central mobility anchor such as home agent or local mobility anchor. Thus, some issues, including a single point of failure, long handover delay, and scalability, are exposed in these existing approaches. Ever-increasing demand for mobile Internet traffic changes the mobile network from a hierarchical architecture to a flat architecture and distributed schemes are being researched for the purpose of adapting to new flat architecture and overcoming the aforementioned issues. In this paper, we do a survey of existing network mobility management protocols, current solutions for distributed mobility management, and present an efficient PMIPv6-based distributed network mobility management scheme. The proposed scheme consists of characteristics of distributed mobility management and a new handover mechanism to reduce the packet delivery overhead while keeping seamless Internet access to users in vehicles. By numerical analysis, we prove that our new approach improves service disruption time and packet delivery cost compared to exiting solutions under various environment conditions.

[1]  Indu Arora,et al.  Cloud Databases: A Paradigm Shift in Databases , 2012 .

[2]  Rui L. Aguiar,et al.  Use-cases analysis for multicast listener support in network-based distributed mobility management , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[3]  Younghan Kim,et al.  Distributed network mobility management , 2012, The 2012 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications.

[4]  H Anthony Chan Proxy mobile IP with distributed mobility anchors , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[5]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management , 2012, RFC.

[6]  Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.  Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol , 2005, RFC.

[7]  Sangheon Pack Relay-Based Network Mobility Support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[8]  Kiwon Hong,et al.  Mobile flow-aware networks for mobility and QoS support in the IP-based wireless networks , 2014, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  Fabio Giust,et al.  Flat access and mobility architecture: An IPv6 distributed client mobility management solution , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[10]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based mobility Management Protocols , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Younghan Kim,et al.  Enhanced PMIPv6 Route Optimization Handover , 2008, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[13]  Arturo Azcorra,et al.  Nemo-enabled localized mobility support for internet access in automotive scenarios , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Carlos Bernardos,et al.  PMIPv6-based distributed anchoring , 2016 .

[15]  Younghan Kim,et al.  Cost-efficient network mobility scheme over proxy mobile IPv6 network , 2011, IET Commun..

[16]  Thomas Narten,et al.  IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration , 1996, RFC.

[17]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Distributed and Dynamic Mobility Management in Mobile Internet: Current Approaches and Issues , 2011, J. Commun..

[18]  Jari Arkko,et al.  The Network Access Identifier , 2005, RFC.

[19]  Saurabh Bagchi,et al.  Distributed mobility management for efficient video delivery over all-IP mobile networks: Competing approaches , 2013, IEEE Network.

[20]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Distributed or Centralized Mobility? , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.