Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport

Abstract A recent trend to engage and promote sustainable behaviors in transport foresees gamification, i.e. the use of game design elements in nongame contexts. To foster the expected behavior change, one should appropriately conceive, deploy and manage gamification. The paper addresses the problem of gamification design by proposing an advanced user-centered approach accounting for players’ heterogeneous preferences. This is performed using stated preference methods and is applied to a reverse logistics case study. By comparing the results obtained with the proposed approach to those derived from the traditionally adopted ones, the paper shows that the former would provide considerable new insights with respect to players’ heterogeneous preferences, thus, possibly, increasing the chance of achieving satisfactory results. The paper suggests that, whenever designing gamification to foster engagement and behavior change in transport, one should adopt a user-centered approach based on stated choice experiments to maximize its probability of success.

[1]  Annapaola Marconi,et al.  Using gamification to incentivize sustainable urban mobility , 2015, 2015 IEEE First International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[2]  Luisa Scaccia,et al.  On finite sample performance of confidence intervals methods for willingness to pay measures , 2015 .

[3]  E. Marcucci,et al.  Behavioural implications of non-linear effects on urban freight transport policies: The case of retailers and transport providers in Rome , 2016 .

[4]  A. Negrușa,et al.  Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism , 2015 .

[5]  Mario Muñoz Organero,et al.  GAFU: Using a Gamification Tool to Save Fuel , 2015, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[6]  Paul Denny,et al.  The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement , 2013, CHI.

[7]  Luisa Scaccia,et al.  Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective , 2015 .

[8]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[9]  Agostino Nuzzolo,et al.  Differentiated Regulation of Urban Freight Traffic: Conceptual Framework and Examples from Italy , 2008 .

[10]  J. Pykett,et al.  Governing temptation: Changing behaviour in an age of libertarian paternalism , 2011 .

[11]  Edoardo Marcucci,et al.  Smart urban freight planning process: integrating desk, living lab and modelling approaches in decision-making , 2017 .

[12]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Player Types: A Meta-synthesis , 2014, Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc..

[13]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre , 2008 .

[14]  Antti Jylhä,et al.  MatkaHupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility , 2013, UbiComp.

[15]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[16]  Edoardo Marcucci,et al.  Investigating the potential for off-hour deliveries in the city of Rome: Retailers’ perceptions and stated reactions , 2017 .

[17]  A. Pluchino,et al.  Integrating discrete choice models and agent-based models for ex-ante evaluation of stakeholder policy acceptability in urban freight transport , 2017 .

[18]  Michela Le Pira,et al.  Modelling stakeholder participation in transport planning , 2016 .

[19]  D. Hensher,et al.  Choice Modelling: Foundational Contributions , 2011 .

[20]  J. McGonigal Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[21]  John M. Rose,et al.  Stated choice experimental design theory: the who, the what and the why , 2014 .

[22]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[23]  M. Bliemer,et al.  Approximation of bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designs , 2008 .

[24]  D. Hensher How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load , 2006 .

[25]  E. Marcucci,et al.  Urban freight transport modelling: an agent-specific approach , 2014 .

[26]  Roderick McCall,et al.  Studying Commuter Behaviour for Gamifying Mobility , 2014 .

[27]  Luis de Marcos,et al.  Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Using Gamification to Enhance Staff Motivation in Logistics , 2013, ISAGA.

[29]  José Holguín-Veras,et al.  Behavioral investigation on the factors that determine adoption of an electronic toll collection system: Passenger car users , 2011 .

[30]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  Gamification in theory and action: A survey , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Atsushi Hiyama,et al.  Communication pedometer: a discussion of gamified communication focused on frequency of smiles , 2013, AH.

[32]  John M. Rose,et al.  Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments , 2013 .

[33]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[34]  Nazar Zaki,et al.  Gamification of a recycle bin with emoticons , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[35]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  E. Marcucci,et al.  Dissecting preference heterogeneity in consumer stated choices , 2012 .

[37]  Tatsuo Nakajima,et al.  Gamifying intelligent environments , 2011, Ubi-MUI '11.

[38]  E. Marcucci,et al.  Measuring the effects of an urban freight policy package defined via a collaborative governance model , 2017 .

[39]  Bei Wang,et al.  Reverse Logistics , 2004 .

[40]  Susanne Robra-Bissantz,et al.  Gamification of online idea competitions: insights from an explorative case , 2011, GI-Jahrestagung.

[41]  Italo Meloni,et al.  I-Pet Individual Persuasive Eco-travel Technology: A Tool for VTBC Program Implementation , 2015 .

[42]  Giuseppe Inturri,et al.  Towards a decision-support procedure to foster stakeholder involvement and acceptability of urban freight transport policies , 2017, European Transport Research Review.

[43]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[44]  E. Marcucci,et al.  Integrating Direct and Reverse Logistics in a “Living Lab” Context: Evaluating Stakeholder Acceptability and the Potential of Gamification to Foster Sustainable Urban Freight Transport , 2018, City Logistics 3.

[45]  A. Pluchino,et al.  Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: Accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects , 2017 .

[46]  Edoardo Marcucci,et al.  A Stated Ranking Experiment to Study Policy Acceptance: The Case of Freight Operators in Rome’s LTZ , 2012 .

[47]  J. Cafazzo,et al.  Design of an mHealth App for the Self-management of Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[48]  P. Boxall,et al.  Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach , 2002 .

[49]  Ronald S. Tibben-Lembke,et al.  Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices , 1999 .

[50]  Leyland Pitt,et al.  Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification , 2015 .

[51]  W. Brög,et al.  Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences from three continents , 2009 .

[52]  J. Anable,et al.  Rethinking habits and their role in behaviour change: the case of low-carbon mobility , 2012 .

[53]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Heterogeneous Conjoint Choice Designs , 2005 .

[54]  E. Marcucci,et al.  Stakeholder-specific data acquisition and urban freight policy evaluation: evidence, implications and new suggestions , 2016 .

[55]  Cory Doctorow,et al.  For the Win , 2010 .

[56]  Martin Hahmann,et al.  Leveraging gamification in demand dispatch systems , 2012, EDBT-ICDT '12.

[57]  Edoardo Marcucci,et al.  Urban Freight Transport Policy Changes: Improving Decision Makers’ Awareness Via an Agent-Specific Approach , 2014 .

[58]  D. McFadden MEASUREMENT OF URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND , 1974 .

[59]  Mark J. Nelson,et al.  Soviet and American precursors to the gamification of work , 2012, MindTrek.

[60]  Francisco Luis Gutiérrez Vela,et al.  Analysis and application of gamification , 2012, Interacción.

[61]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  The identification of factors influencing destination choice: An application of the repertory grid methodology , 1982 .

[62]  John M. Rose,et al.  Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice , 2009 .

[63]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: a decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods , 2015 .

[64]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[65]  Deepak Ganesan,et al.  TruCentive: A game-theoretic incentive platform for trustworthy mobile crowdsourcing parking services , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.