Assessment of the sound reduction index of building elements by near field excitation through an array of loudspeakers and structural response measurements by laser Doppler vibrometry

Abstract At low frequencies the assessment of the sound reduction index of building elements in the laboratory according to the standard ISO 10140-2:2010 is burdened by a large variation in the measurement results. This is due to the fact that at low frequencies the acoustic field is not sufficiently diffuse. This paper discusses a measurement procedure in which a diffuse field is created in the source room by means of an array of loudspeakers positioned closely to the building insulation element under test. This procedure exploits the acoustic near field of the loudspeaker array. The problems related to the breakdown of the diffuse field assumption of the receiving room are eliminated by measuring the structural response of the building insulation element under test by means of laser Doppler vibrometry and the application of the Rayleigh integral to compute the radiated sound power. The sound reduction index is determined from the ratio of the incident sound power, created by the loudspeaker array, and the radiated sound power. The measurement approach is validated by means of a measurement of the sound reduction index of a single layer glazing. Comparisons are made with an analytical model and with a standardized ISO 10140-2:2010 measurement. Although the method offers clear, strong points in terms of removing room acoustic effects from the measurements in the lower frequency range, a point of concern is the measurement effort.

[1]  Teresa Bravo,et al.  The experimental synthesis of random pressure fields: Practical feasibility , 2006 .

[2]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Mobility and impedance methods in structural dynamics , 2018, Advanced Applications in Acoustics, Noise and Vibration.

[3]  Quentin Leclere Multi-channel spectral analysis of multi-pass acquisition measurements , 2009 .

[4]  Gary H. Koopmann,et al.  Method for computing the sound power of machines based on the Helmholtz integral , 1982 .

[5]  Christ Glorieux,et al.  Perceived Loudness of Neighbour Sounds Heard Through Heavy and Light-Weight Walls with Equal R w + C 50 – 5000 , 2016 .

[6]  A. J. Jerri The Shannon sampling theorem—Its various extensions and applications: A tutorial review , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Jukka Keränen,et al.  Reproducibility of the Present and the Proposed Single-Number Quantities of Airborne Sound Insulation , 2012 .

[8]  Jeffrey Mahn,et al.  The Uncertainty of the Proposed Single Number Ratings for Airborne Sound Insulation , 2012 .

[9]  Andy Moorhouse,et al.  Indirect measurement of acoustic power into a small room at low frequencies , 2012 .

[10]  A. G. Piersol Use of coherence and phase data between two receivers in evaluation of noise environments , 1978 .

[11]  Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor,et al.  Spectral analysis methods for vehicle interior vibro-acoustics identification , 2009 .

[12]  Carl Hopkins,et al.  Field measurement of airborne sound insulation between rooms with non-diffuse sound fields at low frequencies , 2005 .

[13]  C. Maury,et al.  Enhancing low frequency sound transmission measurements using a synthesis method. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Gardonio,et al.  The synthesis of spatially correlated random pressure fields , 2005 .

[15]  Mingsian R Bai,et al.  Estimation of sound power of baffled planar sources using radiation matrices. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[17]  F. Fahy,et al.  Sound and Structural Vibration: Radiation, Transmission and Response , 1987 .

[18]  W. T. Chu Eigenmode analysis of the interference patterns in reverberant sound fields , 1980 .

[19]  H. Nélisse,et al.  Characterization of a diffuse field in a reverberant room , 1997 .

[20]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Identification of complex diesel engine noise sources based on coherent power spectrum analysis , 2007 .

[21]  Giovanni Zambon,et al.  Uncertainty analysis by a Round Robin Test of field measurements of sound insulation in buildings: single numbers and low frequency bands evaluation - airborne sound insulation , 2013 .

[23]  Christ Glorieux,et al.  Determining radiated sound power of building structures by means of laser Doppler vibrometry , 2015 .

[24]  Fredrik Ljunggren,et al.  Airborne sound insulation between dwellings, from 50 vs. 100 Hz – A compilation of Swedish field surveys , 2018 .

[25]  Teresa Bravo,et al.  The experimental synthesis of random pressure fields: Methodology , 2006 .

[26]  Volker Wittstock,et al.  On the uncertainty of single-number quantities for rating airborne sound insulation , 2007 .

[27]  Teresa Bravo,et al.  Variability of low frequency sound transmission measurements , 2004 .

[28]  Christ Glorieux,et al.  A global error estimator for the uncertainty of a multi-channel spectral analysis , 2015 .

[29]  F. Jacobsen,et al.  The coherence of reverberant sound fields. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Diogo Mateus,et al.  Sound insulation provided by single and double panel walls???a comparison of analytical solutions versus experimental results , 2004 .

[31]  Richard V. Waterhouse,et al.  Interference Patterns in Reverberant Sound Fields. II , 1955 .

[32]  Mohamed Ichchou,et al.  Equivalent ‘rain on the roof’ loads for random spatially correlated excitations in the mid–high frequency range , 2009 .

[33]  Sean Smith,et al.  Uncertainty determination of in situ airborne sound insulation measurements , 2015 .