The Role of On-line Retailer Brand and Infomediary Reputation in Increasing Consumer Purchase Intention

Lower search costs are one of the major benefits of on-line shopping. In the past, when search costs were relatively high, consumers relied on extrinsic cues like brand and price. The lowering of search costs with the advent of the Internet has changed the way consumers use external cues. In addition, the emergence of the on-line "infomediary" has spawned complex interactions among infomediary reputation, manufacturer brand, and retailer brand. This paper shows the main effects of these factors and explores two-way interaction effects. It demonstrates that a well-known on-line retailer brand increases purchase intention for a weak manufacturer brand more than for a strong one, and by contrast, that a reputable infomediary increases purchase intention for a strong manufacturer brand more than for a weak one.

[1]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[2]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. , 1971 .

[3]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process , 1972 .

[4]  R. Staelin,et al.  Prepurchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Major Household Appliances , 1972 .

[5]  Thomas S. O'Connor,et al.  The influence of price, store name, and brand name on perception of product quality , 1976 .

[6]  Peter D. Bennett,et al.  Consumer and industrial buying behavior , 1978 .

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[8]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Perceived quality : how consumers view stores and merchandise , 1985 .

[9]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[10]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[11]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience , 1989 .

[12]  A. Rao,et al.  The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review , 1989 .

[13]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[14]  John Roberts,et al.  Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition , 1991 .

[15]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[16]  William Boulding,et al.  A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do , 1993 .

[17]  J. Friedman,et al.  Middlemen as guarantors of quality , 1994 .

[18]  B. Wernerfelt.  Efficient Marketing Communication: Helping the Customer Learn , 1996 .

[19]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  Predecisional Distortion of Product Information , 1998 .

[20]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 2000 .

[21]  E. PedersenPer.  Behavioral Effects of Using Software Agents for Product and Merchant Brokering , 2000 .

[22]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Pricing and Product Design: Intermediary Strategies in an Electronic Market , 2000, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[23]  Per E. Pedersen.  Behavioral Effects of Using Software Agents for Product and Merchant Brokering: An Experimental Study of Consumer Decision-Making , 2000, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[24]  W. Redmond.  The potential impact of artificial shopping agents in e-commerce markets , 2002 .

[25]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Signaling Quality by Selling through a Reputable Retailer : An Example of Renting the Reputation of Another Agent , 2007 .