Is Urban Politics a Black Hole? Analyzing the Boundary Between Political Science and Urban Politics

For many years, the scholarship of urban politics has drifted away from political science, both theoretically and methodologically. In this article, we systematically examine the boundary between urban political studies and the broader discipline of political science through an analysis of journal citations. We find that the analogy of a “black hole” is apt: No ideas escape the event horizon surrounding urban politics; furthermore, ideas from outside rarely penetrate the subfield's borders. Our evidence suggests that this is mostly due to a stunted solipsism that has engulfed too much of urban politics, but some of the blame must rest with the increasing insularity of political science. We suggest a research agenda that highlights the inherent dynamism in urban politics, and conclude with an endorsement of framework-driven citation analysis as a method of examining the flow of ideas across scholarly boundaries.

[1]  P. John.  Explaining policy change: the impact of the media, public opinion and political violence on urban budgets in England1 , 2006 .

[2]  K. Mossberger,et al.  Building Blocks for a Methodology for Comparative Urban Political Research , 2006 .

[3]  D. Judd.  Everything is Always Going to Hell , 2005 .

[4]  Adrian Davies,et al.  Mega-projects (The changing politics of Urban Public Investment), Alan Altshuler, David Luberoff. Brookings Institution (2003), 399pp., £39.95(hard), £16.75 (soft). , 2005 .

[5]  J. Sellers.  Re-Placing the Nation , 2005 .

[6]  J. Pierre.  Comparative Urban Governance , 2005 .

[7]  Clarence N. Stone.  Looking Back to Look Forward , 2005 .

[8]  A. Nelson.  Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment , 2004 .

[9]  Meagan M. Jordan.  Punctuations and agendas: A new look at local government budget expenditures , 2003 .

[10]  James C. Garand,et al.  Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists , 2003, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[11]  张嵬 莫梅琦,et al.  ISI Web of Knowledge体系检索特色与应用评析 , 2003 .

[12]  M. Moser,et al.  Privatization, Politics, and Urban Services: The Political Behavior of Charter Schools , 2003 .

[13]  Thomas Weissinger.  Black Studies Scholarly Communication , 2002 .

[14]  R. Pieters,et al.  Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals , 2002 .

[15]  P. Kantor,et al.  The Politics of Urban America: A Reader , 2001 .

[16]  K. Mossberger,et al.  The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory , 2001 .

[17]  Clarence N. Stone.  The Atlanta Experience Re-examined: The Link Between Agenda and Regime Change , 2001 .

[18]  K. Dowding.  Explaining Urban Regimes , 2001 .

[19]  Charles H. Heying,et al.  Olympic Dreams , 2001 .

[20]  John Portz.  Black Social Capital: The Politics of School Reform in Baltimore, 1986–1998 . By Orr Marion. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999. 242p. $35.00 cloth, $17.95 paper. , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Margaret Terry Orr,et al.  Black Social Capital: The Politics of School Reform in Baltimore, 1986-1998. Studies in Government and Public Policy. , 1999 .

[22]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Theory and Urban Politics , 1998 .

[23]  B. Rundquist.  Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. By Bryan D. Jones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. $15.95 , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[24]  G. Stoker.  Regime theory and urban politics , 1995 .

[25]  Cheryl D. Young.  An Assessment of Articles Published by Women in 15 Top Political Science Journals , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[26]  S. Stigler,et al.  The Journals of Economics , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Samore Cnyon,et al.  City limits , 1994, The Lancet.

[28]  Mark Schneider.  Renewing Cities . By Ross J. Gittell. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992. 232p. $39.50. , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[29]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[30]  Mark Schneider,et al.  The Antigrowth Entrepreneur: Challenging the "Equilibrium" of the Growth Machine , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[31]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[32]  Mark Schneider,et al.  The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia. , 1990 .

[33]  J. Feagin,et al.  Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. , 1990 .

[34]  H. Molotch,et al.  Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place , 1987 .

[35]  B. Jones,et al.  The Sustaining Hand: Community Leadership and Corporate Power , 1986 .

[36]  Stephen L. Elkin.  TWENTIETH CENTURy URBAN REGIMES , 1985 .

[37]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[38]  Clarence N. Stone.  Systemic Power in Community Decision Making: A Restatement of Stratification Theory , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[39]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[40]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[41]  James O’Connor,et al.  The fiscal crisis of the state , 1973 .

[42]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[43]  William H. Flanigan,et al.  The Theory of Political Coalitions. , 1965 .

[44]  R. Dahl,et al.  Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. , 1962 .

[45]  The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest , 1961 .

[46]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[47]  E. E. Schattschneider.  The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America , 1960 .

[48]  G. Stigler.  The Tenable Range of Functions of Local Government , 1957 .

[49]  George Rosen,et al.  Community Power Structure. A Study of Decision Makers , 1954 .

[50]  C. W. Chilman.  : Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers , 1953 .

[51]  Howard Coonley,et al.  Making democracy work , 1941, Electrical Engineering.