Seismic Behavior of the Cube of Zoroaster Tower Using the Discrete Element Method

ABSTRACT There are several ancient stone masonry structures of great archeological significance in earthquake-prone areas around the world. Kaʻba-ye Zartošt (Cube of Zoroaster) is a 14.0 m square in shape tower, which was built using white limestone blocks and dry joints. The tower dates back to the Achaemenid empire era and is located in the earthquake-prone area of Nagsh-e Rustam in Fars, Iran. Although, after approximately 2,500 years the tower is still standing, it is now in a severely deteriorated condition and may be vulnerable against future large in magnitude earthquakes. This paper presents the application of a previously developed three-dimensional numerical model based on the discrete element method of analysis to investigate the seismic behavior of the Cube of Zoroaster tower. The tower was represented by a series of distinct blocks separated by zero-thickness interfaces. The developed model allows finite displacements and rotations of distinct blocks while new contacts between the blocks are automatically recognized and updated as the calculation progresses. A series of non-linear dynamic analysis have been performed. To this end, the behavior of the tower to different ground shaking motions is discussed and the possible failure modes for each case are explored.

[1]  P. Polycarpou,et al.  Simulation of the response of ancient columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations , 2008 .

[2]  F. Omori,et al.  Seismic Experiments on the Fracturing and Overturning of Columns , 1900 .

[3]  José V. Lemos,et al.  Numerical study of the seismic behaviour of a part of the Parthenon Pronaos , 2003 .

[4]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Dry Joint Stone Masonry Walls Subjected to In-Plane Combined Loading , 2005 .

[5]  José V. Lemos,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Blocky Masonry Structures , 2000 .

[6]  Michalis Fragiadakis,et al.  Seismic reliability assessment of classical columns subjected to near-fault ground motions: SEISMIC RELIABILITY OF CLASSICAL COLUMNS TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS , 2013 .

[7]  Amin Mohebkhah,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Historic Masonry Structures , 2015 .

[8]  Amin Mohebkhah,et al.  Three dimensional modelling of ancient colonnade structural systems subjected to harmonic and seismic loading , 2016 .

[9]  P. Komodromos,et al.  Planar investigation of the seismic response of ancient columns and colonnades with epistyles using a custom-made software , 2009 .

[10]  A. Munjiza.  The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method: Munjiza/Discrete Element Method , 2004 .

[11]  Sarhosis,et al.  On the stability of colonnade structural systems under static and dynamic loading conditions , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  P. Cundall.  A computer model for simulating progressive, large-scale movements in blocky rock systems , 1971 .

[13]  Michalis Fragiadakis,et al.  Seismic Reliability Assessment of Classical Columns Subjected to Near Source Ground Motions , 2013 .

[14]  Veronika Shendova,et al.  Shaking Table Testing of Models of Historic Buildings and Monuments – IZIIS’ Experience , 2012 .

[15]  I. Anastasopoulos,et al.  Experimental investigation of the seismic response of classical temple columns , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  O. W. Muscarella,et al.  Persepolis III: The Royal Tombs and Other Monuments , 1970 .

[17]  J. Lemos,et al.  Numerical prediction of the earthquake response of classical columns using the distinct element method , 2002 .

[18]  Željana Nikolić,et al.  A combined finite-discrete numerical model for analysis of masonry structures , 2015 .

[19]  Elizabeth Vintzileou,et al.  Testing Historic Masonry Elements and/or Building Models , 2014 .

[20]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Non-linear static behaviour of ancient free-standing stone columns , 2017 .

[21]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations , 2000 .

[22]  Vasilis Sarhosis,et al.  Discrete element modelling of the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of dry-joint masonry wall constructions , 2017 .

[23]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Seismic Behaviour of the Walls of the Parthenon A Numerical Study , 2011 .

[24]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Seismic response of stone masonry spires: Computational and experimental modeling , 2012 .

[25]  Željana Nikolić,et al.  Overview of the methods for the modelling of historical masonry structures , 2013 .

[26]  Željana Nikolić,et al.  A combined finite-discrete element analysis of dry stone masonry structures , 2013 .

[27]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Experimental investigation of the earthquake response of a model of a marble classical column , 2002 .

[28]  Carlos Sousa Oliveira,et al.  Discrete element modeling of a scaled masonry structure and its validation , 2016 .

[29]  A. Munjiza,et al.  Numerical analysis of 3D dry-stone masonry structures by combined finite-discrete element method , 2017 .

[30]  Panagiotis G. Asteris,et al.  Seismic vulnerability of ancient colonnade: Two story colonnade of the forum in Pompeii , 2015 .

[31]  Francesco Fabbrocino,et al.  Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of the seismic vulnerability of masonry towers , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.