Improving Ultrasound Detection of Uterine Adenomyosis Through Computational Texture Analysis

Abstract The purpose of our study was to determine if a textural analysis metric can be implemented to improve diagnosis of adenomyosis by ultrasound. We retrospectively identified 38 patients with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis that also had a pelvic ultrasound within 6 months. We also identified 50 normal pelvic ultrasound examinations confirmed by a normal pelvic MRI within 6 months as a control group. A region of interest (ROI) was subsequently placed on the study population ultrasound image corresponding to the area of adenomyosis on MRI. An ROI was placed in the area of the junctional zone in the normal controls. The abnormal and normal ROIs were then compared against trained normal and abnormal distributions to determine the success rate, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of our computer metric. The ultrasound reports performed before MRI were also reviewed to determine the radiologist correct/incorrect interpretation rate for comparison with our textural analysis metric. Using a training population of 50 normal ultrasound examinations (confirmed with a normal MRI) and 38 abnormal ultrasound examinations (MRI confirmed adenomyosis), we had an overall 75% (66/88 accurately diagnosed) success rate with a sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 70%, 79%, 73%, and 76%, respectively (P < .0001). The sensitivity and false-negative rate of the initial ultrasound interpretation were 26% (10/38) and 74% (28/38), respectively.

[1]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Cervical Texture by Ultrasound and Correlation with Gestational Age , 2016, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[2]  K. Togashi,et al.  Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[3]  H. Hricak,et al.  Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[4]  R. Zeman,et al.  Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound texture analysis of fetal lungs to predict neonatal respiratory morbidity , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. , 1996, Radiology.

[7]  Cai Chang,et al.  Classifying Uterine Myoma and Adenomyosis Based on Ultrasound Image Fractal and Texture Features , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[8]  R. Azziz Adenomyosis: current perspectives. , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[9]  R. Kurman,et al.  Benign Diseases of the Endometrium , 1987 .

[10]  Joseph Konrad,et al.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasound images for computer-aided diagnosis , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[11]  Yung-Chang Chen,et al.  Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  Jerome Delotte,et al.  MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  E. Darai,et al.  Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. , 2001, Human reproduction.