Assessment of the best available wastewater management techniques for a textile mill: cost and benefit analysis.

In the present study, several water recovery and end-of-pipe wastewater treatment alternatives were evaluated towards the evaluation of Best Available Techniques (BATs) for the management of wastewaters from a denim textile mill in accordance with the European Union's Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive. For this purpose, an assessment that translates the key environmental aspects into a quantitative measure of environmental performance and also financial analysis was performed for each of the alternatives. The alternatives considered for water recovery from dyeing wastewaters were nanofiltration (NF) with coagulation and/or microfiltration (MF) pre-treatment, ozonation or peroxone and Fenton oxidation. On the other hand, for the end-of-pipe treatment of the mill's mixed wastewater, ozonation, Fenton oxidation, membrane bioreactor (MBR) and activated sludge (AS) process followed by membrane filtration technologies were evaluated. The results have indicated that membrane filtration process with the least environmental impacts is the BAT for water recovery. On the other side, MBR technology has appeared as the BAT for the end-of-pipe treatment of the mill's mixed wastewater. A technical and financial comparison of these two BAT alternatives revealed that water recovery via membrane filtration from dyeing wastewaters is selected as the BAT for the water and wastewater management in the mill.

[1]  R Dijkmans,et al.  Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level , 2000 .

[2]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Application of nanofiltration for removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: rejection properties and economic evaluation , 2001 .

[3]  Thane Brown,et al.  Engineering Economics and Economic Design for Process Engineers , 2006 .

[4]  Azni Idris,et al.  TREATMENT OF TEXTILE WASTEWATER BY ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES - A REVIEW , 2004 .

[5]  A. Ghrabi,et al.  Landfill leachate treatment with ozone and ozone/hydrogen peroxide systems. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  M. A. Boncz,et al.  Selective oxidation of organic compounds in waste water by ozone-based oxidation processes , 2002 .

[7]  Rein Munter,et al.  ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES – CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS , 2001, Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Chemistry.

[8]  M. Mehrvar,et al.  Integration of Advanced Oxidation Technologies and Biological Processes: Recent Developments, Trends, and Advances , 2004, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[9]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[10]  J. Órfão,et al.  Ozonation of textile effluents and dye solutions under continuous operation: Influence of operating parameters. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  Gianluca Ciardelli,et al.  Experimental campaigns on textile wastewater for reuse by means of different membrane processes , 2002 .

[12]  Jun-xin Liu,et al.  Dyeing and printing wastewater treatment using a membrane bioreactor with a gravity drain , 2006 .

[13]  Jyrki Tenhunen,et al.  Cost and environmental impact of nanofiltration in treating chemically pre-treated surface water , 2006 .

[14]  A. Matteucci,et al.  Membrane Technologies Applied to Textile Wastewater Treatment , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Johannes Fresner Starting continuous improvement with a cleaner production assessment in an Austrian textile mill , 1998 .

[16]  G. Gésan-Guiziou,et al.  Cleaning-in-place coupled with membrane regeneration for re-using caustic soda solutions , 2007 .

[17]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Feasibility Analysis of In-Plant Control for Water Minimization and Wastewater Reuse in a Wool Finishing Textile Mill , 2004, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[18]  V. Hontou,et al.  BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry , 2008 .

[19]  Iván Muñoz,et al.  Environmental assessment of different photo-Fenton approaches for commercial reactive dye removal. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  George Mavrotas,et al.  An integrated approach for the selection of Best Available Techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization , 2007 .

[21]  G. Insel,et al.  Effect of textile auxiliaries on the biodegradation of dyehouse effluent in activated sludge. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[22]  Andrea Giordano,et al.  Nanofiltration of low-contaminated textile rinsing effluents for on-site treatment and reuse , 2005 .

[23]  Seval Kutlu Akal Solmaz,et al.  Regeneration of industrial district wastewater using a combination of Fenton process and ion exchange : A case study , 2007 .

[24]  P. Cañizares,et al.  Costs of the electrochemical oxidation of wastewaters: a comparison with ozonation and Fenton oxidation processes. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  M. Jekel,et al.  Ozonation and Advanced Oxidation of Wastewater: Effect of O3 Dose, pH, DOM and HO•-Scavengers on Ozone Decomposition and HO• Generation , 2006 .

[26]  Sixto Malato,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a coupled solar photocatalytic-biological process for wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[27]  Van Veldhuisen Technical and economic aspects of measures to reduce water pollution from the textile finishing industry , 1994 .

[28]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Treatment and Reuse of Wastewater from the Textile Wet-Processing Industry : Review of Emerging Technologies , 1998 .

[29]  D Orhon,et al.  In-plant control applications and their effect on treatability of a textile mill wastewater. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  A. Gorenflo,et al.  Nanofiltration of a German groundwater of high hardness and NOM content: performance and costs , 2003 .

[31]  Azza Hafez,et al.  Wastewater treatment and water reuse of food processing industries. Part II: Techno-economic study of a membrane separation technique , 2007 .

[32]  Aileen N.L. Ng,et al.  A mini-review of modeling studies on membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment for municipal wastewaters , 2007 .

[33]  A. Badiru,et al.  Computational Economic Analysis for Engineering and Industry , 2007 .

[34]  Sheng H. Lin,et al.  A Continuous Fenton's Process for Treatment of Textile Wastewater , 1995 .