Benchmarks Curricular Planning and Assessment Framework: Utilizing Standards Without Introducing Standardization

The national early learning community faces the challenge of using early learning standards and assessments to improve learning environments while preserving educators’ freedom to plan early childhood curriculum that accord with a child-centered focus and developmentally appropriate practices. Drawing on recent developments in approaches to undergraduate assessment, this article introduces an approach to curricular planning and assessment that uses state benchmarks as an umbrella structure to support curricular planning, assessment, and feedback among them. The benchmarks have a hierarchical structure that allows educators to think about benchmarks as embedded within educational goals, spanning different age-ranges, and involving activity across multiple domains of child development. The framework prompts educators to identify benchmarks for particular activities and to assess the age-appropriateness of activities and the degree to which they incorporate multiple domains of development. There are two primary curricular measures: (1) the match measure between educator predictions and observed activity, which provides timely feedback about the accuracy of educator predictions for different age-groups and across developmental domains, and (2) an open-ended measure, which provides information about the ways the children surprised educators by using the activity in an unpredicted manner. Both of these measures inform the development of classroom activities and curriculum. This article reports on the pilot implementation of this approach within an early learning program.

[1]  Donna DiPrima Bickel,et al.  Trusting Teachers’ Judgments: A Validity Study of a Curriculum-Embedded Performance Assessment in Kindergarten to Grade 3 , 2001 .

[2]  S. Christenson,et al.  Commentary: The Centrality of the Learning Context for Students' Academic Enabler Skills , 2002 .

[3]  U. Bronfenbrenner Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. , 1977 .

[4]  C. Snow,et al.  Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How , 2008 .

[5]  Jennifer Grisham-Brown,et al.  Preparing Head Start Personnel to Use a Curriculum-Based Assessment , 2008 .

[6]  L. Shepard The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture , 2000 .

[7]  Richard M. Clifford,et al.  Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Revised Edition , 1998 .

[8]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Chapter 4:Professional Development as a Policy Pathway , 2003 .

[9]  Science at the Center: An Emergent, Standards-Based, Child-Centered Framework for Early Learners , 2009 .

[10]  Catherine Scott-Little,et al.  Conceptualization of readiness and the content of early learning standards: The intersection of policy and research? , 2006 .

[11]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Play = Learning: How Play Motivates and Enhances Children's Cognitive and Social-Emotional Growth , 2006 .

[12]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Using Authentic Assessment to Evidence Children’s Progress Toward Early Learning Standards , 2006 .

[13]  P. Rodari Learning science in informal environments: people, places and pursuits. A review by the US National Science Council , 2009 .

[14]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Social Policy Report Giving Child and Youth Development Knowledge Away a Publication of the Society for Research in Child Development Article Begins on Page 3 Using Scientific Knowledge to Inform Preschool Assessment: Making the Case for " Empirical Validity " , 2022 .

[15]  Andrew J. Mashburn,et al.  Effects of Web-Mediated Professional Development Resources on Teacher-Child Interactions in Pre-Kindergarten Classrooms. , 2008, Early childhood research quarterly.

[16]  R. Pianta,et al.  High-Risk Children In Schools: Constructing Sustaining Relationships , 1996 .

[17]  Mariana Souto-Manning,et al.  The Role of Action Research in Fostering Culturally-Responsive Practices in a Preschool Classroom , 2009 .

[18]  L. Mcdonnell Repositioning Politics in Education’s Circle of Knowledge , 2009 .

[19]  Sharon Lynn Kagan,et al.  Early Learning Standards: Changing the Parlance and Practice of Early Childhood Education? , 2004 .

[20]  G. Hein Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , 2009 .

[21]  B. Hamre,et al.  Classroom assessment scoring system. , 2008 .

[22]  D. Dodge,et al.  Connecting Content, Teaching, and Learning: The Creative Curriculum for Preschool. Revised Edition. , 2002 .

[23]  Pam Sammons,et al.  Capturing Quality in Early Childhood through Environmental Rating Scales , 2006 .

[24]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  The articulatory basis of babbling. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  Marcia E. Kraft-Sayre,et al.  Ongoing, Web-Mediated Professional Development Focused on Teacher–Child Interactions: Early Childhood Educators' Usage Rates and Self-Reported Satisfaction , 2009, Early education and development.

[26]  L. Sherrod,et al.  Society for Research in Child Development , 2010 .

[27]  Jerome L. Singer,et al.  Imagination and Play in the Electronic Age , 2005 .

[28]  N. Freeman,et al.  An Authentic Approach to Assessing Pre-Kindergarten Programes: Redefining Readiness , 2008 .

[29]  L. Schulz,et al.  Word, thought, and deed: the role of object categories in children's inductive inferences and exploratory play. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[30]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .