Efficacy of Unsupervised Self-Collected Mid-Turbinate FLOQSwabs for the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Context: The Global Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has resulted in explosive patterns of transmission in most countries. Nasopharyngeal swabs were the specimen’s collection tools recommended for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and for monitoring infection outbreaks in communities. Our objective was to report the quality and efficacy of unsupervised self-collected mid turbinate “dry FLOQSwabs” (MT FLOQSwabs) (56380CS01, Copan). There were 111 specimens collected for the study: 36 by health care personnel, from themselves, to verify the quality and efficacy of mid-turbinate swabs; 75 to compare and assess the diagnostic performance, among health care personnel, of nasopharyngeal swabs and self-collected mid-turbinate FLOQSwabs. A collection of 51 specimens was enrolled to define the efficacy of the Testami program (validation). Our analyses demonstrate that self-collected mid-turbinate dry swabs ensure an accuracy of 97.3%, as compared to the standard nasopharyngeal swabs collected by health care workers. Furthermore, the mid-turbinate FLOQSwabs can be stored without medium for six days at room temperature without affecting the molecular diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Self-collection of diagnostic specimens at home could offer an avenue to increase testing availability for SARS-CoV-2 infection without asking people to travel to a clinic or a laboratory, thus reducing people’s exposure to infection. Our findings demonstrate that unsupervised self-collection swabs, transported dry, are sensitive, practical and easy-to-use tools and should be considered for diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance.

[1]  Shazaad Ahmad,et al.  The utility of beta-2-microglobulin testing as a human cellular control in COVID-19 testing , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[2]  A. M. Leontovich,et al.  The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature Microbiology.

[3]  G. Gao,et al.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  F. Giardina,et al.  Cellular DNA quantification in respiratory samples for the normalization of viral load: a real need? , 2018, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[5]  N. Zhong,et al.  Comparison among nasopharyngeal swab, nasal wash, and oropharyngeal swab for respiratory virus detection in adults with acute pharyngitis , 2013, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[6]  Thomas F. Smith,et al.  Effectiveness of Patient-Collected Swabs for Influenza Testing , 2012, Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

[7]  T. Mazzulli,et al.  Self-Collected Mid-Turbinate Swabs for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Adults with Acute Respiratory Illnesses , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  H. Faden Comparison of Midturbinate Flocked-Swab Specimens with Nasopharyngeal Aspirates for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children by the Direct Fluorescent Antibody Technique , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  S. Carruthers,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Flocked Nasal Midturbinate Swab for Self-Collection in Respiratory Virus Infection Diagnostic Testing , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  S. Esposito,et al.  Collection by trained pediatricians or parents of mid-turbinate nasal flocked swabs for the detection of influenza viruses in childhood , 2010, Virology Journal.

[11]  S. Corden,et al.  Dry cotton or flocked respiratory swabs as a simple collection technique for the molecular detection of respiratory viruses using real-time NASBA. , 2008, Journal of virological methods.