Modeling Connectivity of the Whole: A Graph Theoretic Application in Conservation Planning Prioritization

This work aims to guide conservation prioritization by identifying areas of conservation critical to achieving an interconnected Arizonan landscape. A landscape connectivity assessment conducted with this goal in mind resulted in the identification of Important Connectivity Zones (ICZs) throughout the state. The assessment used graph theoretic and shortest-path betweenness centrality spatial modeling methods to evaluate structural connectivity with landscape integrity data as a permeability surrogate. The analysis yielded a landscape lattice comprised of 382,740 hexagonal nodes, each 100 hectares in size. Selection of nodes that exhibited the greatest cumulative facilitation of ecological flows throughout the entire landscape lattice resulted in the delineation of ICZs. The ICZ network constitutes a series of ‘wildways’ comprised of highly natural zones contributing the most to the connectivity of the entire landscape. The ICZs identified here may serve as a potential blueprint for guiding statewide connectivity efforts as well as informing future conservation action, land management, and planning efforts. Additionally, as ICZs include a metric quantifying their relative importance, this analysis provides a framework upon which local and fine-scale linkage designs can be evaluated within the context of the entire landscape. Such an evaluation may prove useful in identifying locations where fine-scale linkage designs are needed, ranking their relative contribution to connectivity of the whole, and prioritizing their implementation throughout the state.

[1]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[2]  Paul Beier,et al.  The Role of Landscape Connectivity in Planning and Implementing Conservation and Restoration Priorities. Issues in Ecology , 2012 .

[3]  Mark E. J. Newman A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[4]  Robert F. Baldwin,et al.  Landscape network congruency at the ecoregion scale: can we expect corridor ‘umbrellas’? , 2016 .

[5]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  Use of Linkage Mapping and Centrality Analysis Across Habitat Gradients to Conserve Connectivity of Gray Wolf Populations in Western North America , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Optimizing dispersal corridors for the Cape Proteaceae using network flow. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Edward A. Cook,et al.  Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks , 2002 .

[9]  N. Koutsias,et al.  Species-based versus habitat-based evaluation for conservation status assessment of habitat types in the East Aegean islands (Greece) , 2011 .

[10]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  A Resistant‐Kernel Model of Connectivity for Amphibians that Breed in Vernal Pools , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  Steven E. Hanser,et al.  The human footprint in the west: a large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[13]  Jorge Orestes Cerdeira,et al.  Linking like with like: optimising connectivity between environmentally-similar habitats , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  R. Baldwin,et al.  Conservation Planning for Amphibian Species with Complex Habitat Requirements: A Case Study Using Movements and Habitat Selection of the Wood Frog Rana Sylvatica , 2006 .

[15]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  LOW-QUALITY HABITAT CORRIDORS AS MOVEMENT CONDUITS FOR TWO BUTTERFLY SPECIES , 2005 .

[16]  Robert F. Baldwin,et al.  Landscape-scale Conservation Planning , 2010 .

[17]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Impacts of corridors on populations and communities , 2006 .

[18]  Ryan M. Perkl,et al.  Measuring landscape integrity (LI): development of a hybrid methodology for planning applications , 2017 .

[19]  Stephen C. Trombulak,et al.  Modeling Ecoregional Connectivity , 2010 .

[20]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Peter B. Mather,et al.  Corridors and connectivity: when use and function do not equate , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  W. Murdoch ISSUES IN ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[23]  Robert F. Baldwin,et al.  Rescaling the Human Footprint: A tool for conservation planning at an ecoregional scale , 2008 .

[24]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography , 2014 .

[25]  D. Harrison Dispersal Characteristics of Juvenile Coyotes in Maine , 1992 .

[26]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[27]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[28]  Gillian Woolmer,et al.  The Human Footprint as a Conservation Planning Tool , 2010 .

[29]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .

[30]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks , 2006 .

[31]  D. Theobald,et al.  Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States , 2012 .

[32]  F. Nii-Amoo Dodoo,et al.  Gender, Power, and Reproduction: Rural‐Urban Differences in the Relationship Between Fertility Goals and Contraceptive Use in Kenya , 2009 .

[33]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[34]  E. Sanderson,et al.  The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild , 2002 .