Can Virtual Humans Be More Engaging Than Real Ones?

Emotional bonds don't arise from a simple exchange of facial displays, but often emerge through the dynamic give and take of face-to-face interactions. This article explores the phenomenon of rapport, a feeling of connectedness that seems to arise from rapid and contingent positive feedback between partners and is often associated with socio-emotional processes. Rapport has been argued to lead to communicative efficiency, better learning outcomes, improved acceptance of medical advice and successful negotiations. We provide experimental evidence that a simple virtual character that provides positive listening feedback can induce stronger rapport-like effects than face-to-face communication between human partners. Specifically, this interaction can be more engaging to storytellers than speaking to a human audience, as measured by the length and content of their stories.

[1]  V. Yngve On getting a word in edgewise , 1970 .

[2]  J. W. Cogger Are you a skilled interviewer? , 1982, The Personnel journal.

[3]  Cogger Jw Are you a skilled interviewer , 1982 .

[4]  Philip Tsui,et al.  Failure of rapport: why psychotherapeutic engagement fails in the treatment of Asian clients. , 1985, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[5]  D. Fuchs Examiner Familiarity Effects on Test Performance , 1987 .

[6]  R. Frank Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions , 1990 .

[7]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates , 1990 .

[8]  J. Cappella On Defining Conversational Coordination and Rapport , 1990 .

[9]  P. Ekman An argument for basic emotions , 1992 .

[10]  D. McNeill Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1992 .

[11]  K. Scherer Interpersonal expectations: Comment: Interpersonal expectations, social influence, and emotion transfer , 1993 .

[12]  P. Blanck Interpersonal expectations: Author index , 1993 .

[13]  A. Fogel Developing through relationships origins of communication, self, and culture , 1993 .

[14]  R. Frank,et al.  The evolution of one-shot cooperation: An experiment , 1993 .

[15]  M. Studdert-Kennedy Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. , 1994 .

[16]  W. S. Reilly,et al.  Believable Social and Emotional Agents. , 1996 .

[17]  K. Grammer,et al.  The Courtship Dance: Patterns of Nonverbal Synchronization in Opposite-Sex Encounters , 1998 .

[18]  K. Chang,et al.  Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea , 1999, CHI '99.

[19]  Matthew Brand,et al.  Voice puppetry , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[20]  D. Keltner,et al.  Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis , 1999 .

[21]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope Vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[23]  J. Bavelas,et al.  Listeners as co-narrators. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. Morris,et al.  Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. , 2000 .

[25]  Nigel G. Ward,et al.  Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese , 2000 .

[26]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[27]  M. Alibali,et al.  Effects of Visibility between Speaker and Listener on Gesture Production: Some Gestures Are Meant to Be Seen , 2001 .

[28]  B. Parkinson Putting appraisal in context , 2001 .

[29]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. , 2001 .

[30]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Recognition of Affective Communicative Intent in Robot-Directed Speech , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[31]  S. Marsella,et al.  Interactive Pedagogical Drama for Health Interventions , 2003 .

[32]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Effects of Embodied Interface Agents and Their Gestural Activity , 2003, IVA.

[33]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion. , 2003 .

[34]  R.W. Schafer,et al.  From frequency to quefrency: a history of the cepstrum , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[35]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion , 2004, Cognitive Systems Research.

[36]  G. K. Jonsson,et al.  Initial Interpersonal Attraction between Mixed-Sex Dyad and Movement Synchrony , 2005 .

[37]  Aude Billard,et al.  Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[38]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Hierarchical Motion Controllers for Real-Time Autonomous Virtual Humans , 2005, IVA.

[39]  L. Anolli The hidden structure of interaction : from neurons to culture patterns , 2005 .

[40]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Contextual recognition of head gestures , 2005, ICMI '05.

[41]  Susan Persky,et al.  The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[42]  J. Allwood,et al.  A study of gestural feedback expressions , 2006 .

[43]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Towards a Common Framework for Multimodal Generation: The Behavior Markup Language , 2006, IVA.

[44]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Virtual Rapport , 2006, IVA.