Balancing knowledge exploration and exploitation within and across technological and geographical domains

This paper deals with the knowledge exploration-exploitation framework by investigating the performance implications of balancing these two activities within and across domains. Specifically, we focus on firms’ strategies for new knowledge searching and acquisition, and analyse how the development of valuable innovations is positively influenced by firms’ capability to find a trade-off between knowledge exploration and exploitation within and across technological and geographical domains. The empirical analysis of 5,575 patented biotechnology inventions provides strong support for the proposed theoretical arguments, by revealing that balancing exploration and exploitation is always beneficial. Furthermore, findings demonstrate that balancing across domains produces greater advantages than balancing within domains, since this allows organizational impediments and cognitive constraints in resource allocation to be overcome.

[1]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[3]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[4]  B. Looy,et al.  Organizing for Continuous Innovation: On the Sustainability of Ambidextrous Organizations , 2005 .

[5]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[6]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[8]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Michel Quéré,et al.  KNOWLEDGE DYNAMICS: BIOTECHNOLOGY’S INCURSION INTO THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[12]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[13]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[15]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[18]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[19]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[20]  M. Gittelman,et al.  A Note on the Value of Patents as Indicators of Innovation: Implications for Management Research , 2008 .

[21]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[22]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge Flows and Geography in Biotechnology , 2002 .

[23]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[25]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism , 2009 .

[26]  Manuel G. Serapio,et al.  Globalization of industrial R&D: an examination of foreign direct investments in R&D in the United States , 1999 .

[27]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  The impact of old technologies on innovation: the case of the US biotechnology industry , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions , 2000 .

[29]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[30]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms , 1997 .

[31]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: the story of Hewlett‐Packard's thermal ink‐jet , 2002 .

[33]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[34]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[35]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  The nanotech vs . the biotech revolution : sources of productivity in incumbent firm research , 2007 .

[36]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[37]  S. Breschi,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis , 2000 .

[38]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[39]  S. Newell,et al.  Trade-offs between knowledge exploitation and exploration activities , 2005 .

[40]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[41]  C. Gouriéroux,et al.  PSEUDO MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS: THEORY , 1984 .

[42]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[43]  Ashish Arora,et al.  A Breath of Fresh Air? Firm Type, Scale, Scope, and Selection Effects in Drug Development , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Gino Cattani,et al.  Preadaptation, Firm Heterogeneity, and Technological Performance: A Study on the Evolution of Fiber Optics, 1970–1995 , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Fabrizio Perretti,et al.  Mixing genres and matching people: a study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood , 2007 .

[46]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[47]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[48]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[49]  Charles Baden-Fuller,et al.  Lessons from the Celltech Case: Balancing Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Renewal , 1999 .

[50]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[51]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firm , 2002 .

[52]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[53]  Jasjit Singh Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[54]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[55]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  When are assets complementary? star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[56]  Evan Rawley,et al.  Diversification, Coordination Costs and Organizational Rigidity: Evidence from Microdata , 2010 .

[57]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  In Search of Alliance-Level Relational Capabilities: Balancing Innovation Value Creation and Appropriability in R&D Alliances , 2011 .

[58]  S. Bartholomew National Systems of Biotechnology Innovation: Complex Interdependence in the Global System , 1997 .

[59]  Christine M. Beckman The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[60]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[61]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[62]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[63]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[64]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[65]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology , 2006 .

[66]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[67]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[68]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[69]  G. M. Duijsters,et al.  Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks, structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered , 2008 .

[70]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[71]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .

[72]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[73]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Balance Within and Across Domains: The Performance Implications of Exploration and Exploitation in Alliances , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[74]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations , 2009 .

[75]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[76]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[77]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[78]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .