Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves

Abstract The environmental Kuznets curve assumes an inverted U-shaped relation between environmental damage and per capita income. Recently it has been argued in the literature that in addition to income levels, the inequality in the distribution of power and income is (positively) related to environmental degradation. We provide an additional argument, based on simple aggregation, for including a measure of income dispersion in empirical analyses. When the relationship between environmental damage and household income is concave (e.g. resembles an environmental Kuznets curve), then income inequality is negatively related to total environmental damage. Results from an empirical analysis of cross-national variation indicate that the aggregation effect can run counter to and outweigh the political economy effect for some environmental indicators.

[1]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Peasant Household Behaviour with Missing Markets: Some Paradoxes Explained , 1991 .

[2]  Klaus Deininger,et al.  A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality , 1996 .

[3]  M. Cropper,et al.  The Interaction of Population Growth and Environmental Quality , 1994 .

[4]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in the Netherlands , 1995 .

[5]  D. Stern.  Progress on the environmental Kuznets curve? , 1998, Environment and Development Economics.

[6]  N. Shafik,et al.  Economic Growth and Environmental Quality Time-Series and Cross-Country Evidence , 1992 .

[7]  J. Boyce,et al.  Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve , 1998 .

[8]  T. Selden,et al.  Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? , 1994 .

[9]  J. Stoorvogel,et al.  Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in sub-Saharan Africa: 1983-2000. , 1990 .

[10]  J. A. Doeleman,et al.  Beyond Rio: the environmental crisis and sustainable livelihoods in the Third World. , 1995 .

[11]  T. Panayotou.  Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development , 1993 .

[12]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development , 1996 .

[13]  Peter Pauly,et al.  The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve , 1998 .

[14]  Rati Ram.  The role of real income level and income distribution in fulfillment of basic needs , 1985 .

[15]  H. Zou,et al.  A Data Set on Income Distribution , 1999 .

[16]  I. Singh.  Agricultural household models : extensions, applications, and policy , 1987 .

[17]  James Andreoni,et al.  The Simple Analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2001 .

[18]  J. Boyce.  Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation , 1994 .

[19]  H. Folmer,et al.  Income distribution and the fulfillment of basic needs: theory and empirical evidence. , 1994 .

[20]  E. Magnani.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution , 2000 .

[21]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[22]  Lyle Scruggs,et al.  Political and economic inequality and the environment , 1998 .

[23]  Dwayne Benjamin,et al.  Household Composition, Labor Markets, and Labor Demand: Testing for Separation in Agricultural Household Models , 1992 .

[24]  N. Brokaw,et al.  Household determinants of deforestation by amerindians in honduras , 1997 .

[25]  Matthew E. Kahn.  A household level environmental Kuznets curve , 1998 .