DYNAMIC TASK SHARING STRATEGY FOR ADAPTIVE HUMAN-ROBOT COLLABORATIVE WORKCELL

Industry 4.0 prompts the re-organization of production systems with flexible collaborative workcells. Half way between the manual and the full automated cell, the new cell is configured by having humans and robots working together and collaborating to the execution of complex working tasks. Considering the production process subdivided in work tasks, it is apparent that some tasks could be performed more proficiently by humans or robots alone, others collaboratively. Analogy can be found with the job assignment problem in conventional production, for which a wide range of strategies and procedures has been researched. In Human-Robot Collaboration the procedures should be redefined having new objectives and following different rules. This is the intent of the study: to classify which tasks should be executed by men, robots or by both collaboratively. The classification method makes use of a training set of pre-classified tasks. Then task assignment combined with job scheduling is introduced to avoid resource overload.

[1]  Christian Brecher,et al.  SOAR-based sequence control for a flexible assembly cell , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation.

[2]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Industrial applications with cooperating robots for the flexible assembly , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[3]  D Leifer Whose job is it anyway? , 1996, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[4]  Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti,et al.  Safe Human-Robot Cooperation in an Industrial Environment , 2013 .

[5]  Giulia Bruno,et al.  Applicability of Human-Robot Collaboration to Small Batch Production , 2016, PRO-VE.

[6]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The KUKA-DLR Lightweight Robot arm - a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing , 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK.

[7]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Brett Browning,et al.  A survey of robot learning from demonstration , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Ivan Lundberg,et al.  Safety of collaborative industrial robots: Certification possibilities for a collaborative assembly robot concept , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM).

[10]  Saeed Yahyanejad,et al.  YuMi, Come and Play with Me! A Collaborative Robot for Piecing Together a Tangram Puzzle , 2016, ICR.

[11]  Dario Antonelli,et al.  FREE: Flexible and Safe Interactive Human-Robot Environment for Small Batch Exacting Applications , 2014, Technology Transfer Experiments from the ECHORD Project.

[12]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach , 2010 .

[13]  Feng Duan,et al.  Extending task analysis in HTA to model man-machine collaboration in cell production , 2009, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[14]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[15]  M. Hagele,et al.  rob@work: Robot assistant in industrial environments , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[16]  Ewart de Visser,et al.  Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[17]  Giulia Bruno,et al.  Ontology-Based Framework to Design a Collaborative Human-Robotic Workcell , 2017, PRO-VE.

[18]  Dario Antonelli,et al.  Qualification of a Collaborative Human-robot Welding Cell☆ , 2016 .

[19]  Christopher J. Harper,et al.  Towards the Development of International Safety Standards for Human Robot Interaction , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[20]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .