Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility.

Sentences spoken "clearly" (and slowly) are significantly more intelligible than those spoken "conversationally" for hearing-impaired listeners in a variety of backgrounds [Picheny, Durlach, and Braida, J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 96-103 (1985); Uchanski et al., J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 494-509 (1996); Payton, Uchanski, and Braida, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1581-1592 (1994)]. However, it is unknown whether slower speaking rates are necessary for highly intelligible speech or whether an alternative form of clear speech exists at faster (i.e., normal) rates. To investigate this question, talkers with significant public speaking experience were asked to produce clear and conversational speech at slow, normal, and quick rates. A method for eliciting clear speech was introduced that ensured the clearest possible speech was obtained at each of these speaking rates. To probe for other highly intelligible speaking modes, talkers also recorded sentences in two other speaking modes: soft and loud. Intelligibility tests indicated that clear speech was the only speaking mode that provided a consistent intelligibility advantage over conversational speech. Moreover, the advantage of clear speech was extended to faster speaking rates than previously reported. These results suggest that clear speech has some inherent acoustic properties that contribute to its high intelligibility without altering rate. Identifying these acoustic properties could lead to improved signal-processing schemes for hearing aids.

[1]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Durational cues to word boundaries in clear speech , 1990, Speech Commun..

[2]  Ralph A. Johnson,et al.  Statistical analysis in chemistry and the chemical industry , 1955 .

[3]  O. J. Dunn,et al.  Applied statistics: analysis of variance and regression , 1975 .

[4]  N. Umeda,et al.  Letter: Effect of speaking mode on temporal factors in speech: vowel duration. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Frieda Goldman Eisler Psycholinguistics : experiments in spontaneous speech , 1968 .

[6]  T H Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected speech signals: preliminary results. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. Schroeder Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[8]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. , 1997, Science.

[9]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Francine R. Chen,et al.  Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech at the segmental level , 1980 .

[11]  Virginia A. Clark,et al.  Applied Statistics: Analysis of Variance and Regression. , 1975 .

[12]  Raid Amin,et al.  Applied Statistics: Analysis of Variance and Regression , 2004, Technometrics.

[13]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Word boundary cues in clear speech: A supplementary report , 1991, Speech Commun..

[15]  L. Crump Statistical Analysis in Chemistry and the Chemical Industry. , 1955 .

[16]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  May Uchanski Rosalie Spectral and temporal contributions to speech clarity for hearing impaired listeners , 1988 .

[18]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing , 1979 .

[21]  T. Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected‐speech signals: Current results , 1988 .

[22]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics , 1996, Speech Commun..

[23]  David Malah,et al.  Time-domain algorithms for harmonic bandwidth reduction and time scaling of speech signals , 1979 .

[24]  Influences of Variations in Speech Intensity and Other Factors upon the Speech Spectrum , 1955 .

[25]  Sung C. Choi,et al.  Introductory applied statistics in science , 1978 .

[26]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  Jae S. Lim,et al.  Signal estimation from modified short-time Fourier transform , 1983, ICASSP.