Stoop or Squat: A Biomechanical and Metabolic Evaluation

Abstract For the past 40 years it has been widely advocated that all lifting be carried out with a “squat lifting posture” (bend at the knees, back erect). The presumed basis for this has been to reduce the compressive force on the low back. Detailed biomechanical evaluations show that the more common “stooped lifting posture” (bend at the waist) may in fact be superior to the recommended squat method on this basis, even when the load can be placed close to the body. The compressive force on the lumbosacral disc is estimated to be equal or slightly lower for loads greater than 5 kg when the load is lifted using the stooped lift posture. This should not be viewed as sufficient evidence to reject conven- tional wisdom. The compressive force with the stooped-lift posture may in turn lead to a non-uniform distribution of pressure over the disc, thus enabling a smaller compressive force to produce rupture. Thus, there is no clear biomechanical rationale for deciding between the two postures. Using metabolic en...

[1]  B. Bresler,et al.  Role of the Trunk in Stability of the Spine , 1961 .

[2]  F. H. Bonjer.  ACTUAL ENERGY EXPENDITURE IN RELATION TO THE PHYSICAL WORKING CAPACITY , 1962 .

[3]  Dempster Wt,et al.  CONVERSION SCALES FOR ESTIMATING HUMERAL AND FEMORAL LENGTHS AND THE LENGTHS OF FUNCTIONAL SEGMENTS IN THE LIMBS OF AMERICAN CAUCASOID MALES. , 1964 .

[4]  G. Lehmakn,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS AS A BASIS OF WORK ORGANIZATION IN INDUSTRY , 1958 .

[5]  Gordon Ee.  Natural history of the intervertebral disc. , 1961 .

[6]  J R Brown,et al.  Lifting as an industrial hazard. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[7]  O. Perey,et al.  Fracture of the vertebral end-plate in the lumbar spine; an experimental biochemical investigation. , 1957, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[8]  Park KyungS.,et al.  A Biomechanical Evaluation of Two Methods of Manual Load Lifting , 1974 .

[9]  E R Tichauer,et al.  Ergonomics: the state of the art. , 1967, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumber discs , 1970 .

[11]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  A Biomechanical Model for Analysis of Symmetric Sagittal Plane Lifting , 1970 .

[12]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  PROBLEM OF MANUAL MATERIALS HANDLING. , 1975 .

[13]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION OF HUMAN STRENGTH. , 1974 .

[14]  Rowe Ml.  Low back pain in industry. A position paper. , 1969 .

[15]  A. E. Chapman,et al.  The strength of the flexor and extensor muscles of the trunk. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A computerized biomechanical model-development of and use in studying gross body actions. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R CONTINI,et al.  Determination of Body Segment Parameters1 , 1963, Human factors.

[18]  P. Åstrand,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology , 1970 .

[19]  J. Ringer.  Low Back Pain in Industry , 1976, Occupational health nursing.

[20]  D. F. Jones.  Back strains: the state of the art , 1971 .

[21]  Royal,et al.  MOVEMENTS OF THE THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE WHEN LIFTING: A CHRONO-CYCLOPHOTOGRAPHIC STUDY. , 1965, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  Er Tichauer,et al.  A pilot study of the biomechanics of lifting in simulated industrial work situations , 1971 .

[23]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Prediction of metabolic rates for manual materials handling jobs. , 1978, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[24]  S. Snook,et al.  Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to female workers. , 1974, Occupational health nursing.

[25]  William Foote Whyte,et al.  Men at work , 1974 .

[26]  H. R. Lissner,et al.  Biomechanical studies on the lumbar spine and pelvis. , 1959, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.