Performance assessment of Large Eddy Simulation (LES) for modeling dispersion in an urban street canyon with tree planting

Abstract The potential of a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model to reliably predict near-field pollutant dispersion is assessed. To that extent, detailed time-resolved numerical simulations of coupled flow and dispersion are conducted for a street canyon with tree planting. Different crown porosities are considered. The model performance is assessed in several steps, ranging from a qualitative comparison to measured concentrations, over statistical data analysis by means of scatter plots and box plots, up to the calculation of objective validation metrics. The extensive validation effort highlights and quantifies notable features and shortcomings of the model, which would otherwise remain unnoticed. The model performance is found to be spatially non-uniform. Closer agreement with measurement data is achieved near the canyon ends than for the central part of the canyon, and typical model acceptance criteria are satisfied more easily for the leeward than for the windward canyon wall. This demonstrates the need for rigorous model evaluation. Only quality-assured models can be used with confidence to support assessment, planning and implementation of pollutant mitigation strategies.

[1]  K. Pericleous,et al.  Modelling air quality in street canyons : a review , 2003 .

[2]  Gavin Tabor,et al.  Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review , 2010 .

[3]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Hazardous gas model evaluation with field observations , 1993 .

[4]  A S Tomlin,et al.  Introduction to the DAPPLE Air Pollution Project. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  MODEL EVALUATION GUIDANCE AND PROTOCOL DOCUMENT , 2007 .

[6]  Márton Balczó,et al.  Numerical modeling of flow and pollutant dispersion in street canyons with tree planting , 2009 .

[7]  R. Britter,et al.  FLOW AND DISPERSION IN URBAN AREAS , 2003 .

[8]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  Study of line source characteristics for 2-D physical modelling of pollutant dispersion in street canyons , 1996 .

[9]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation , 2012, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics.

[10]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Intercomparison of Numerical Urban Dispersion Models – Part II: Street Canyon in Hannover, Germany , 2001 .

[11]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[12]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT TO SUPPORT THE MODEL EVALUATION GUIDANCE AND PROTOCOL , 2007 .

[13]  Andy Chan,et al.  Numerical simulation of dispersion in urban street canyons with avenue-like tree plantings: Comparis , 2011 .

[14]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Confidence limits for air quality model evaluations, as estimated by bootstrap and jackknife resampling methods , 1989 .

[15]  D. Lilly,et al.  A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid‐scale closure method , 1992 .

[16]  Riccardo Buccolieri,et al.  Dispersion study in a street canyon with tree planting by means of wind tunnel and numerical investigations – Evaluation of CFD data with experimental data , 2008 .

[17]  Douglas G. Fox,et al.  Uncertainty in Air Quality Modeling , 1984 .

[18]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Technical Descriptions and User's Guide for the BOOT Statistical Model Evaluation Software Package, Version 2.0 , 2005 .

[19]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Effect of flow unsteadiness on the mean wind flow pattern in an idealized urban environment , 2012 .

[20]  Bodo Ruck,et al.  On the Impact of Trees on Dispersion Processes of Traffic Emissions in Street Canyons , 2009 .

[21]  Jörg Franke,et al.  The COST 732 Best Practice Guideline for CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment: a summary , 2011 .

[22]  Bodo Ruck,et al.  Die Simulation atmosphärischer Grenzschichten in Windkanälen , 2005 .

[23]  S. Hanna,et al.  Air quality model performance evaluation , 2004 .

[24]  Kit Ming Lam,et al.  Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons , 2006 .

[25]  J. P. V. Doormaal,et al.  ENHANCEMENTS OF THE SIMPLE METHOD FOR PREDICTING INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOWS , 1984 .

[26]  M. Khare,et al.  Modelling of vehicular exhausts – a review , 2001 .

[27]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[28]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[29]  Riccardo Buccolieri,et al.  Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon: Comparison between RANS and LES , 2011 .

[30]  Christof Gromke,et al.  A vegetation modeling concept for Building and Environmental Aerodynamics wind tunnel tests and its application in pollutant dispersion studies. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[31]  Márton Balczó,et al.  Simulation of flow in an idealised city using various CFD codes , 2011 .

[32]  R. Peyret Handbook of Computational Fluid Mechanics , 2000 .