Scale and Condition Economies in Asset Preservation Cost Functions: Case Study Involving Flexible Pavement Treatments

Estimates of planning-level treatment costs are vital inputs for preservation project budgeting, prioritization, and programming in highway asset management. However, with the paucity of analytical research on highway asset preservation costing, agencies have resorted to the use of average costs. However, average cost values fail to adequately accommodate the influence of cost factors such as project size and asset condition at the time of the preservation treatment. In addressing this issue, this paper explores the efficacy of different mathematical specifications, including the Cobb-Douglas form and a variety of other nonlinear forms, for developing treatment cost functions. The paper shows how flexible formulations could be used to specify the response variable in order to avoid unduly restricting the models and to yield cost estimates that are more reliable compared to average costs. The paper shows how to investigate the direction and strengths of scale economies and condition economies in highway asset preservation costs using mathematical forms that allow for determining the partial derivatives of treatment cost with respect to asset dimensions and pretreatment condition. The paper demonstrates its concepts by using data on flexible pavement preservation treatments at a midwestern state highway agency.

[1]  Enno Koehn,et al.  Cost of Delays in Construction , 1978 .

[2]  Chester G. Wilmot,et al.  Estimating future highway construction costs , 2003 .

[3]  Tarek Hegazy,et al.  NEURAL NETWORK MODEL FOR PARAMETRIC COST ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS , 1998 .

[4]  Dar-Hao Chen,et al.  Effectiveness of Preventative Maintenance Treatments Using Fourteen SPS-3 Sites in Texas , 2003 .

[5]  Jamshid Sodikov COST ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH , 2005 .

[6]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Regularization neural network for construction cost estimation , 1998 .

[7]  Adam Ross,et al.  COST ESTIMATING AND FORECASTING FOR HIGHWAY WORK IN KENTUCKY , 1996 .

[8]  Sprague,et al.  Study of the Cost-Effectiveness of Various Flexible Pavement Maintenance Treatments , 2006 .

[9]  Sung Hoon An,et al.  Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning , 2004 .

[10]  John Collura,et al.  SERVICE LIVES AND COSTS OF LOCAL HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION TREATMENTS , 1993 .

[11]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[12]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY PAVEMENT DETERIORATION FROM IN-SERVICE PAVEMENT DATA , 1990 .

[13]  Ralph Haas,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness-Based Priority Programming of Standardized Pavement Maintenance , 1997 .

[14]  Samuel Labi,et al.  The Effectiveness of Maintenance and Its Impact on Capital Expenditures , 2003 .

[15]  Wayne J. Davis,et al.  Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management , 1987 .

[16]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming , 2007 .

[17]  Patrick S. McCarthy,et al.  Transportation Economics: Theory and Practice : A Case Study Approach , 2001 .

[18]  Ronald McCaffer,et al.  FACTORS OF NON-EXCUSABLE DELAYS THAT INFLUENCE CONTRACTORS' PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[19]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Estimating Cost Discrepancies in Highway Contracts: Multistep Econometric Approach , 2008 .

[20]  Annie R. Pearce,et al.  Range Estimating for Risk Management Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[21]  Carlos E. Correa,et al.  REHABILITATION STRATEGIES FOR HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS , 2001 .

[22]  Charles T. Jahren,et al.  Predictors of Cost‐Overrun Rates , 1990 .

[23]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Transportation decision making , 2007 .

[24]  Dennis A Morian,et al.  Pennsylvania SPS-6 Performance at 10 Years: Evaluation of Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies , 2003 .

[25]  Ralph Haas,et al.  Determining Return on Long-Life Pavement Investments: , 2006 .