Integration of laboratory testing and constitutive modeling of soils

Abstract A soil constitutive model that correctly captures soil behavior under general loading modes is requisite to solving complex boundary value geotechnical engineering problems. Available laboratory tests provide information on material behavior within a very limited range of stress–strain paths and do not cover the full range of loading paths experienced in a boundary value problem. Soil behavior information developed from most laboratory tests are often limited and insufficient to validate constitutive model performance under general loading conditions. This paper explores a new approach for linking soil laboratory testing and constitutive model development through the use of a novel computational framework: self-learning simulations (SelfSim). SelfSim is an inverse analysis approach that extracts underlying material constitutive behavior from boundary measurements of load and displacement. SelfSim is applied to two simulated laboratory tests, a triaxial compression shear test with no-slip frictional ends (loading base and cap), and a triaxial torsional shear test with no-slip frictional ends. The frictional ends result in non-uniform states of stress and strain throughout the tested specimen. SelfSim successfully extracts the diverse stress–strain response experienced throughout the specimens. A neural network-based constitutive model is developed using extracted soil behavior from both laboratory tests and used successfully in the forward prediction of the load-settlement behavior of a simulated strip footing. The results demonstrate that SelfSim establishes a direct link between laboratory testing and soil constitutive modeling to extract soil behavior under complex loading modes and to readily develop corresponding constitutive models.

[1]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Integration of the modified Cam-Clay model in non-linear finite element analysis , 1992 .

[2]  Seiichi Miura,et al.  DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF ANISOTROPIC DENSE SAND UNDER PRINCIPAL STRESS AXES ROTATION , 1986 .

[3]  G Mesri,et al.  THE UNIQUENESS OF THE END-OF-PRIMARY (EOP) VOID RATIO-EFFECTIVE STRESS RELATIONSHIP. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, SAN FRANCISCO, 12-16 AUGUST 1985 , 1985 .

[4]  Kenneth L. Lee.  END RESTRAINT EFFECTS ON UNDERAINED STATIC TRIAXIAL STRENGTH OF SAND , 1978 .

[5]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Formulation of MIT-E3 constitutive model for overconsolidated clays , 1994 .

[6]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  On the description of anisotropic workhardening , 1967 .

[7]  K. Roscoe,et al.  ON THE GENERALIZED STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOUR OF WET CLAY , 1968 .

[8]  G. N. Pande,et al.  Identification of elastic constants for orthotropic materials from a structural test , 2003 .

[9]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data , 2003 .

[10]  James M. Duncan,et al.  The Significance of Cap and Base Restraint , 1968 .

[11]  J. H. Atkinson,et al.  Effect of recent stress history on the stiffness of overconsolidated soil , 1990 .

[12]  Chandrakant S. Desai,et al.  FLUID CUSHION TRULY TRIAXIAL OR MULTIAXIAL TESTING DEVICE , 1979 .

[13]  Camilo Marulanda,et al.  Integration of Numerical Modeling and Field Observations of Deep Excavations , 2005 .

[14]  P. W. Rowe,et al.  Importance of Free Ends in Triaxial Testing , 1964 .

[15]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Knowledge-Based Modeling of Material Behavior with Neural Networks , 1992 .

[16]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Constitutive modeling of geomaterials from non-uniform material tests , 1998 .

[17]  G. N. Pande,et al.  On self-learning finite element codes based on monitored response of structures , 2000 .

[18]  D. Wood.  Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics , 1991 .

[19]  A. Schofield,et al.  Critical State Soil Mechanics , 1968 .

[20]  J H Garrett,et al.  KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODELLING OF MATERIAL BEHAVIOUR WITH NEURAL NETWORKS , 1991 .

[21]  Egor P. Popov,et al.  A model of nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loading , 1975 .

[22]  J. R. F. Arthur,et al.  Induced anisotropy in a sand , 1977 .

[23]  Vinod K. Garga,et al.  Quasi-steady state: a real behaviour? , 1997 .

[24]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Stress deformation and strength characteristics , 1977 .

[25]  D. C. Drucker,et al.  Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design , 1952 .

[26]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Generalized strain probing of constitutive models , 2004 .

[27]  Poul V. Lade,et al.  Elasto-plastic behavior of K0-consolidated clay in torsion shear tests. , 1989 .

[28]  R. D. Krieg.  A Practical Two Surface Plasticity Theory , 1975 .

[29]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Numerical implementation of a neural network based material model in finite element analysis , 2004 .

[30]  A. Casagrande,et al.  Investigation of Stress-Deformation and Strength Characteristics of Compacted Clays. , 1960 .

[31]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Formulation of a unified constitutive model for clays and sands , 1999 .

[32]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models , 1998 .

[33]  Jerry A. Yamamuro,et al.  Physics and mechanics of soil liquefaction , 1999 .

[34]  Jean H. Prevost,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF MONOTONIC AND CYCLIC UNDRAINED CLAY BEHAVIOUR , 1977 .

[35]  Robert J. Marks,et al.  Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[36]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Novel Approach to Integration of Numerical Modeling and Field Observations for Deep Excavations , 2006 .

[37]  Khaled Sobhan,et al.  Incremental Stress-Strain Behavior of Granular Soil , 1995 .