Quantitative selection of variation reduction plans

Quality has been a rallying call in design and manufacturing for the last two decades. One way to improve quality is through variation reduction (VR). VR teams use tools such as Design of Experiments (DoE) and robust design to improve product performance and quality by reducing variation introduced by manufacturing processes. Because VR teams are typically resource constrained, they must carefully select where to focus their efforts. Planning for VR is complex because reduction efforts are executed on individual features and processes but benefits are accrued when the overall product quality improves. The problem is further complicated by the existence of multiple performance criteria and hundreds of processes and dimensions that effect each performance requirement. Consequently, VR teams typically use qualitative assessments to prioritize and schedule their efforts. This paper provides a mathematical model capable of optimally allocating VR resources for a complex product. The VR model has three parts: a model of variation propagation, a model of variation costs, and a model of variation reduction costs. These models are used to directly calculate the optimal resource allocation plan and schedule for a product with multiple product quality requirements. An example from the aerospace industry is used to demonstrate the theory.

[1]  Mark Ayiety Ardayfio Methods for capturing design intent using key characteristics , 1998 .

[2]  S. S. Chakravorty,et al.  Using the theory of constraints to guide the implementation of quality improvement projects in manufacturing operations , 1995 .

[3]  Anna C. Thornton,et al.  A Mathematical Framework for the Key Characteristic Process , 1999 .

[4]  W. Deming Out of the crisis : quality, productivity and competitive position , 1986 .

[5]  A. Slocum,et al.  Precision Machine Design , 1992 .

[6]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments , 1998 .

[7]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream , 1992 .

[8]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[9]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[10]  Allen C. Ward,et al.  Conceptual robustness in simultaneous engineering: An extension of Taguchi's parameter design , 1994 .

[11]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  QUANTIFYING DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING ROBUSTNESS THROUGH STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES , 1996 .

[12]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Swept Envelopes of Cutting Tools in Integrated Machine and Workpiece Error Budgeting , 1997 .

[13]  Bradley S. Homann,et al.  Precision machine design assistant: A constraint-based tool for the design and evaluation of precision machine tool concepts , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[14]  Charles H. Fine Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems , 1986 .

[15]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[16]  Anna C. Thornton Variation Risk Management Using Modeling and Simulation , 1999 .