Early learners' discrimination of second-language vowels.

It is uncertain from previous research to what extent the perceptual system retains plasticity after attunement to the native language (L1) sound system. This study evaluated second-language (L2) vowel discrimination by individuals who began learning the L2 as children ("early learners"). Experiment 1 identified procedures that lowered discrimination scores for foreign vowel contrasts in an AXB test (with three physically different stimuli per trial, where "X" was drawn from the same vowel category as "A" or "B"). Experiment 2 examined the AXB discrimination of English vowels by native Spanish early learners and monolingual speakers of Spanish and English (20 per group) at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1000 and 0 ms. The Spanish monolinguals obtained near-chance scores for three difficult vowel contrasts, presumably because they did not perceive the vowels as distinct phonemes and because the experimental design hindered low-level encoding strategies. Like the English monolinguals, the early learners obtained high scores, indicating they had shown considerable perceptual learning. However, statistically significant differences between early learners and English monolinguals for two of three difficult contrasts at the 0-ms ISI suggested that their underlying perceptual systems were not identical. Implications for claims regarding perceptual plasticity following L1 attunement are discussed.

[1]  N. Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  The Influence of Initial Exposure on Lexical Representation: Comparing Early and Simultaneous Bilinguals. , 2005 .

[2]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[3]  A J van Hessen,et al.  Modeling phoneme perception. II: A model of stop consonant discrimination. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .

[5]  R. Fox,et al.  Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  N. Cowan,et al.  The use of auditory and phonetic memory in vowel discrimination. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Resolution for speech sounds: basic sensitivity and context memory on vowel and consonant continua , 1988 .

[9]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Linguistic experience and the "perceptual magnet effect." , 1995 .

[11]  L Polka,et al.  Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[13]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.

[14]  O. Bohn,et al.  A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Michael H. Long Maturational Constraints on Language Development , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A robust method to study stress "deafness". , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  F. Grosjean Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person , 1989, Brain and Language.

[19]  J. Harnsberger,et al.  On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Albert Costa,et al.  First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals , 2000 .

[21]  D. Massaro Preperceptual auditory images. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  J. Flege Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception , 2003 .

[23]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  PERCEIVING VOWELS IN A SECOND LANGUAGE , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  J. Flege Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[25]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. Scovel,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CRITICAL PERIOD RESEARCH , 2000, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[27]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Assimilation of non‐native vowel contrasts to the American English vowel system. , 1996 .

[28]  James L. McClelland Failures to Learn and their Remediation: A Hebbian Account , 1999 .

[29]  P. Kuhl A new view of language acquisition. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  W. Elliott Maturational Constraints on Language Development , 2000 .

[32]  A. Lotto,et al.  Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[34]  C. Pallier,et al.  The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries , 2001, Psychological science.

[35]  C. Pallier,et al.  The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[36]  C. Pallier,et al.  A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception , 1997, Cognition.