Compilation of tables of surface deposition velocities for O3, NO2 and SO2 to a range of indoor surfaces

Abstract Surface deposition velocities of O 3 , NO 2 and SO 2 were measured in chamber experiments at relative air humidity ranging from 0% to 90% and obtained from literature screening, for a range of material surfaces typically found indoors. The data were compiled in tables comprising 24 material classes and five values of relative air humidity for each gas. Interpolation between data points and extrapolation based on measurements on similar materials were used to fill in the tables where values from measurement were lacking. The tabulated values should be useful in estimating indoor concentrations of these gases when outdoor concentrations are known and there are no indoor sources.

[1]  Frank X. Mueller,et al.  Decomposition rates of ozone in living areas , 1973 .

[2]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Laboratory study of SO2 dry deposition on limestone and marble: Effects of humidity and surface variables , 1995 .

[3]  R. A. Cox,et al.  Effect of relative humidity on the disappearance of ozone and sulphur dioxide in contained systems , 1972 .

[4]  G. Springer,et al.  Particle and smoke emission from a light duty diesel engine , 1977 .

[5]  Terje Grøntoft,et al.  Dry deposition of ozone on building materials. Chamber measurements and modelling of the time-dependent deposition , 2002 .

[6]  H. Seip,et al.  The humidity dependence of ozone deposition onto a variety of building surfaces , 2004 .

[7]  G. F. Ward,et al.  Rates and mechanisms of NO2 removal from indoor air by residential materials , 1989 .

[8]  M. Wilson Indoor air pollution , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  Ian Colbeck,et al.  Resistance of various building materials to ozone deposition , 1990 .

[10]  D. Spedding Kinetic Study of the Uptake of Sulphur Dioxide by Aluminium , 1972 .

[11]  Peder Wolkoff,et al.  Determination of ozone removal rates by selected building products using the FLEC emission cell. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  R. H. Sabersky,et al.  Concentrations, decay rates, and removal of ozone and their relation to establishing clean indoor air , 1973 .

[13]  C J Weschler,et al.  Ozone in indoor environments: concentration and chemistry. , 2000, Indoor air.

[14]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Critique of the Use of Deposition Velocity in Modeling Indoor Air Quality , 1993 .

[15]  C. Fischer,et al.  The primary reaction in the decomposition of ozone in acidic aqueous solutions , 1991 .

[16]  De-Ling Liu,et al.  Modeling pollutant penetration across building envelopes , 2001 .

[17]  Garry Thomson,et al.  The museum environment , 1979 .

[18]  Peter Brimblecombe,et al.  The composition of museum atmospheres , 1990 .

[19]  F. Lipfert Dry deposition velocity as an indicator for SO2 damage to materials , 1989 .

[20]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[21]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  Guidelines on Pollution Control in Museum Buildings , 2000 .

[22]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Removal of reactive gases at indoor surfaces: Combining mass transport and surface kinetics , 1993 .

[23]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Modeling ozone deposition onto indoor residential surfaces. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.