A Framework for Understanding Institutional Governance Systems and Climate Change: The Case of Australia

In this paper it is proposed that different institutional governance systems bring different climate change outcomes for nations. Furthermore, it is argued that these institutional governance systems impact on the ability of public policies, industries and corporations to adopt and transform their activities to meet issues associated with climate change. We propose that there is a relationship between different governance systems and climate change outcomes in terms of the institutional framework, policies developed, capabilities developed to innovate and speed of adaptation. The case of the Australian approach to climate change is used to highlight the responses that occur in political and institutional environments characterised by a plurality of actors and the difficulties associated with developing a coherent national response.

[1]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[2]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY? , 1997 .

[3]  A. Hoffman.  Climate Change Strategy: The Business Logic behind Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reductions , 2004 .

[4]  W. Form,et al.  Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. , 1996 .

[5]  Andrew Griffiths,et al.  Institutional Governance Systems And Variations In National Competitive Advantage: An Integrative Framework , 2005 .

[6]  A. Griffiths.  Institutional Capacity and National Competitive Advantage: the Rise and Stagnation of the Australian Meat Industry , 1998 .

[7]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism , 1985 .

[8]  M. Best,et al.  The New Competitive Advantage: The Renewal of American Industry , 2001 .

[9]  Tad Murty,et al.  The Global Warming Debate: A Review of the State of Science , 2005 .

[10]  L. G. Thomas,et al.  Competing capitalisms : Capital investment in American, German, and Japanese firms , 1999 .

[11]  T. Skocpol.  Bringing the State Back In: Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research , 1985 .

[12]  R. Raddatz.  Agriculture and Tornadoes on the Canadian Prairies: potential impact of increasing atmospheric CO2 on Summer Severe Weather , 2003 .

[13]  M. Hancock,et al.  Managing Modern Capitalism: Industrial Renewal and Workplace Democracy in the United States and Western Europe , 1991 .

[14]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[15]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[16]  Kent E. Calder,et al.  Strategic Capitalism: Private Business and Public Purpose in Japanese Industrial Finance. , 1994, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[17]  Petra Christmann,et al.  The relative influence of country conditions, industry structure, and business strategy on multinational corporation subsidiary performance , 1999 .

[18]  A. Amsden,et al.  Review of: The Rise of "The Rest": Challenges to the West from Late Industrializing Economies , 2001 .

[19]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[20]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[21]  A. Kolk,et al.  Business Responses to Climate Change: Identifying Emergent Strategies , 2005 .

[22]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[23]  Linda Weiss,et al.  The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era , 1998 .

[24]  Alfred D. Chandler.  Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1962 .

[25]  D. Schwartz.  Climate Change and Culture History in the Grand Canyon Region , 1957, American Antiquity.

[26]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[27]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[28]  J. Mathews.  The origins and dynamics of Taiwan's R&D consortia , 2002 .

[29]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism , 1985 .

[30]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Developing Difference: Social Organization and the Rise of the Auto Industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain, and Argentina , 1999 .

[31]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[32]  William Hare.  Australia and Kyoto: In or Out ? , 2001 .

[33]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .