Is the cuneiform nucleus a critical component of the mesencephalic locomotor region? An examination of the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the cuneiform nucleus on spontaneous and nucleus accumbens induced locomotion

The cuneiform nucleus and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus have both been suggested as possible sites for the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR), an area from which controlled stepping on a treadmill can be elicited following electrical or chemical stimulation in a decerebrate animal. It has been shown that excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus impair neither spontaneous locomotion nor locomotion induced by stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. Excitotoxic lesions of the cuneiform nucleus have not previously been investigated. Rats received either bilateral ibotenate or sham lesions of the cuneiform nucleus combined with bilateral implantation of guide cannulae aimed at the nucleus accumbens. On recovery from surgery spontaneous locomotion was tested, followed by accumbens-stimulated locomotion. For nucleus accumbens stimulation, each rat received bilateral microinjection of each of three doses of d-amphetamine (10.0, 20.0 and 30.0 micrograms) and a vehicle only injection. Locomotor activity was recorded following the injection. In comparison to the sham-lesioned group, the ibotenate-lesioned group showed no differences in either spontaneous or amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. These results suggest that, like the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus, the cuneiform nucleus is not involved in the direct mediation of spontaneous or accumbens-induced locomotion, and thus is very unlikely to be the anatomical substrate of the MLR. The role of the cuneiform nucleus in other types of behavioural control is discussed.

[1]  M. Behbehani,et al.  Afferent projections to the nucleus cuneiformis in the rat , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  E. Garcia-Rill.  The pedunculopontine nucleus , 1991, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  D. Armstrong.  The supraspinal control of mammalian locomotion. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  L. Jordan,et al.  Autoradiographic demonstration of the projections from the mesencephalic locomotor region , 1984, Brain Research.

[5]  W. Nauta,et al.  Efferent connections of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in the rat , 1979, Brain Research.

[6]  R. Depoortère,et al.  Aversion induced by electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region in the intact and freely moving rat , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[8]  H. Fibiger,et al.  NADPH-diaphorase: A selective histochemical marker for the cholinergic neurons of the pontine reticular formation , 1983, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  P. Wall,et al.  Electrophysiological mapping of brainstem projections of spinal cord lamina I cells in the rat , 1985, Brain Research.

[10]  N. Swerdlow,et al.  Lesions of the dorsomedial nucleus of the thalamus, medial prefrontal cortex and pedunculopontine nucleus: effects on locomotor activity mediated by nucleus accumbens-ventral pallidal circuitry , 1987, Brain Research.

[11]  P. Stein.  Motor systems, with specific reference to the control of locomotion. , 1978, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  A. Bechara,et al.  Lesions of the tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus: Effects on the locomotor activity induced by morphine and amphetamine , 1992, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  E. Garcia-Rill,et al.  Projections of the mesencephalic locomotor region in the rat , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[14]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Association of the mesencephalic locomotor region with locomotor activity induced by injections of amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens , 1985, Brain Research.

[15]  M. Olmstead,et al.  Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus block drug-induced reinforcement but not amphetamine-induced locomotion , 1994, Brain Research.

[16]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Stimulation sites in periaqueductal gray, nucleus raphe magnus and adjacent regions effective in suppressing oral-facial reflexes , 1982, Brain Research.

[17]  P. Winn,et al.  An investigation into the role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in the mediation of locomotion and orofacial stereotypy induced by d-amphetamine and apomorphine in the rat , 1994, Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Behbehani,et al.  Nucleus cuneiformis and pain modulation: anatomy and behavioral pharmacology , 1988, Brain Research.

[19]  J. D. Coulter,et al.  Spinal projections from the midbrain in monkey , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[21]  J. Besson,et al.  Afferents and efferents of the rat cuneiformis nucleus: an anatomical study with reference to pain transmission , 1989, Brain Research.

[22]  G. Leichnetz,et al.  Supramedullary afferents of the nucleus raphe magnus in the rat: A study using the transcannula HRP gel and autoradiographic techniques , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  P. Winn,et al.  Outflow from the nucleus accumbens to the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: A dissociation between locomotor activity and the acquisition of responding for conditioned reinforcement stimulated by d-amphetamine , 1994, Neuroscience.

[24]  H. Kimura,et al.  Histochemical mapping of nitric oxide synthase in the rat brain , 1992, Neuroscience.

[25]  P Redgrave,et al.  Organisation of efferent projections from superior colliculus to brainstem in rat: evidence for functional output channels. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[26]  L. W. Swanson,et al.  Evidence for a projection from the lateral preoptic area and substantia innominata to the ‘mesencephalic locomotor region’ in the rat , 1984, Brain Research.

[27]  E. Garcia-Rill,et al.  Pallidal projections to the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) in the cat. , 1981, The American journal of anatomy.

[28]  Shik Ml,et al.  Control of walking and running by means of electric stimulation of the midbrain , 1966 .

[29]  D. S. Zahm,et al.  Specificity in the efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat: Comparison of the rostral pole projection patterns with those of the core and shell , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  P. Winn,et al.  Barbiturate anaesthesia reduces the neurotoxic effects of quinolinate but not ibotenate in the rat pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  P Redgrave,et al.  Movements resembling orientation or avoidance elicited by electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus in rats , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Garcia-Rill,et al.  Chemical activation of the mesecephalic locomotor region , 1985, Brain Research.

[33]  J. Iles,et al.  The mesencephalic centre controlling locomotion in the rat , 1989, Neuroscience.

[34]  H. Fields,et al.  Evidence that an excitatory connection between the periaqueductal gray and nucleus raphe magnus mediates stimulation produced analgesia , 1979, Brain Research.

[35]  E. Garcia-Rill,et al.  Connections of the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) II. Afferents and efferents , 1983, Brain Research Bulletin.

[36]  A. Beitz.  The sites of origin brain stem neurotensin and serotonin projections to the rodent nucleus raphe magnus , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Mogenson,et al.  Electrophysiological responses of neurones in the nucleus accumbens to hippocampal stimulation and the attenuation of the excitatory responses by the mesolimbic dopaminergic system , 1984, Brain Research.

[38]  Peter Redgrave,et al.  Further evidence for segregated output channels from superior colliculus in rat: ipsilateral tecto-pontine and tecto-cuneiform projections have different cells of origin , 1987, Brain Research.