Approach for evaluating the safety of a satellite-based train localisation system through the extended integrity concept

The integrity concept, safety quality criterion for satellite-based localisation systems used in aeronautics, is described in terms of levels (protection and alert levels), time (Time To Alarm) and probability (integrity risk). In land transport applications, the requirements in terms of integrity differ from aeronautics in their definition and values. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) in railways suffer from additional weaknesses i.e. multipath and masking phenomena, which can degrade the localisation integrity. This situation cannot be tolerated in safety-related applications like train control and signalling. To mitigate these weaknesses, GNSS is usually combined with other localisation systems like inertial sensors. However, existing integrity monitoring processes are designed for GNSS integrity evaluation, i.e. to estimate the risk allocated to the position given by the GNSS receivers only. Our research work aims, first, to extend the integrity concept to such systems, and, secondly, to demonstrate how to evaluate, with this concept, the safety of a localisation system as expected in railways. The safety of GNSS-Based Localisation System is formalised and quantitatively evaluated.

[1]  Hong Wang,et al.  A novel method for SIL verification based on system degradation using reliability block diagram , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  R. P. Crow Federal Radionavigation Plan-pie in the sky for civil aviation? , 1998, IEEE 1998 Position Location and Navigation Symposium (Cat. No.98CH36153).

[3]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Research on integrity monitoring for integrated GNSS/SINS system , 2010, The 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[4]  Javier Ibanez Guzman,et al.  Vehicle localization integrity based on trajectory monitoring , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Alessandro Neri,et al.  Augmentation and Integrity Monitoring Network and EGNOS performance comparison for train positioning , 2014, 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[6]  Eckehard Schnieder,et al.  Performance Evaluation of GNSS for Train Localization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Julie Beugin,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of dependability and safety properties of satellite technologies for railway localization , 2012 .

[8]  A. Neri,et al.  Recent progress in application of GNSS and advanced communications for railway signaling , 2013, 2013 23rd International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA).

[9]  Daniele Borio,et al.  Stand-Alone and Hybrid Positioning Using Asynchronous Pseudolites , 2014, Sensors.

[10]  Olivier Le-Marchand Approche autonome pour la localisation et la surveillance de l'intégrité d'un véhicule automobile en environnement complexe. (Autonomous approach for localization and integrity monitoring of a ground vehicle in complex environment) , 2010 .

[11]  P. Groves Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Second Edition , 2013 .

[12]  Washington Y. Ochieng,et al.  Failure Modes and Models for Integrated GPS/INS Systems , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[13]  Shaojun Feng,et al.  User Level Integrity Monitoring and Quality Control for High Accuracy Positioning Using GPS/INS Measurements , 2008 .

[14]  Oliver J. Woodman,et al.  An introduction to inertial navigation , 2007 .

[15]  Marek Jonas Integrity enhancement of the GNSS position solution for the railway applications , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium - PLANS 2014.