Strategies for scatter correction in dual source CT.

PURPOSE Dual source CT (DSCT) systems utilize two measurement systems (A) and (B) offset by about 90 degrees. A special challenge in DSCT is cross-scattered radiation, i.e., scattered radiation from x-ray tube (B) detected in detector (A) and vice versa. Cross-scattered radiation can produce artifacts and degrade the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images. Correction algorithms are mandatory to mitigate the negative effects of cross-scattered radiation. The purpose of this work is to describe and evaluate different methods for cross-scatter correction in DSCT. METHODS The authors present two techniques for cross-scatter correction in DSCT. The first technique (1) is model-based. Assuming that cross-scatter is predominantly surface scatter, adequate knowledge about the surface of the scattering object is sufficient to describe the magnitude and distribution of cross-scatter. The relevant surface information is derived from an analysis of the raw-data sinogram during the CT-scan. The correction is performed by a table look-up into previously measured and stored cross-scatter distributions for a variety of objects with different surface characteristics. The second technique (2) is measurement-based. Dedicated sensors outside the penumbra of the fan beam in the z direction on both detectors (A) and (B) are used for an online measurement of both cross-scattered and forward scattered radiation during the CT-scan. In addition to the two scatter-correction techniques, the authors describe a low-pass filter method for the scatter-correction term with the goal to improve the CNR of the corrected images. This filter can be applied to both model-based (1) and measurement-based (2) scatter correction. Both scatter-correction techniques (1) and (2) are quantitatively assessed and the performance of the low-pass filter method is evaluated using DSCT data of phantoms (water cylinders and anthropomorphic phantoms) and DSCT patient scan data. RESULTS Both scatter-correction techniques restore image contrasts and reduce cross-scatter induced artifacts in DSCT images. The measurement-based technique results in higher CNR than the model-based technique if the proposed low-pass filtering of the scatter-correction term is applied. Low-pass filtering improves the CNR of cross-scatter-correction approaches beyond the limits published in the literature [Engel et al., "X-ray scattering in single- and dual-source CT," Med. Phys. 35(1), 318-332 (2008)]. CONCLUSIONS Both model-based and measurement-based scatter correction can mitigate the negative effects of cross-scatter in DSCT. The application of low-pass filtering to the scatter-correction term improves the CNR whenever the ratio of scattered radiation to total signal is high, as in larger patients.

[1]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control , 2006, European Radiology.

[2]  K. Klingenbeck-Regn,et al.  Efficient object scatter correction algorithm for third and fourth generation CT scanners , 1999, European Radiology.

[3]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[4]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation , 2008, Urological Research.

[5]  Mulugeta Gebregziabher,et al.  Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience , 2008, European Radiology.

[6]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a dual source CT scanner. , 2003, Medical physics.

[7]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Measurement of temporal resolution in dual source CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[8]  S. Richard,et al.  A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[9]  Bernhard Bischoff,et al.  Feasibility of dual-source cardiac CT angiography with high-pitch scan protocols. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[10]  R Proksa,et al.  The frequency split method for helical cone-beam reconstruction. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  Werner Bautz,et al.  Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Scatter Correction Method for X-Ray CT Using Primary Modulation: Theory and Preliminary Results , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[14]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Hiroyuki Kudo,et al.  Exact and approximate algorithms for helical cone-beam CT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience , 2006, European Radiology.

[18]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Technical principles of dual source CT. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[19]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[20]  W. Kalender,et al.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[21]  C. Herrmann,et al.  X-ray scattering in single- and dual-source CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[22]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: Image reconstruction and assessment of image quality. , 2009, Medical physics.