Abstract : The US Army Engineer (USACE) District, Pittsburgh (LRP) is preparing the Upper Ohio Navigation Study, Pennsylvania Feasibility Study and Integrated Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This study will examine alternatives for replacing aging navigation locks on the three uppermost navigation facilities on the Ohio River: Emsworth, Dashields, and Montgomery (EDM) Locks and Dams. Specifically, LRP has recommended replacing the 56-ft-wide auxiliary (riverside) lock at each facility with a new 110-ft-wide main chamber. This action will require encroachment into the dam, eliminating one gate each at Emsworth and Montgomery gated dams, and a section of the Dashields fixed crest dam. The plan at Dashields includes a new gate for additional flow capacity. LRP was directed by the USACE Great Lakes and Ohio River Division (LRD), through the Ohio River Mainstem System Study, to consider fish passage strategies as part of this study. LRP staff, with assistance from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologists and engineers, determined that separate fish passage facilities for these dams were infeasible. However, it was also determined that fish passage could possibly be improved by modifying design features of the replacement navigation facilities themselves. LRP staff has recommended further consideration of fish passage in the Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) phase, which will occur after completion of the Feasibility Study and Integrated EIS. The intent, consistent with the Corps Environmental Operating Principles and good environmental design, is to consider navigation design features that may limit upriver movement of nonnative species, but facilitate movement of both commercial traffic and native fishes. Modernizing outdated navigation locks will present an opportunity to evaluate design or operational features at the EDM facilities during PED phase, supporting LRP s commitment to evaluate fish passage.
[1]
Carl D. Shapiro,et al.
Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior technical guide
,
2009
.
[2]
Brian L. Johnson,et al.
Improving fish passage through navigation dams on the Upper Mississippi River System
,
2004
.
[3]
J. Nestler,et al.
Evaluation of an Integrated Fish-Protection System
,
1995
.
[4]
Gene R. Ploskey,et al.
Responses of Blueback Herring to High-Frequency Sound and Implications for Reducing Entrainment at Hydropower Dams
,
1992
.
[5]
I. Stuart,et al.
Do fish locks have potential in tropical rivers?
,
2007
.
[6]
Mary L. Moser,et al.
Improving Passage Efficiency of Adult American Shad at Low-Elevation Dams with Navigation Locks
,
2000
.
[7]
Brent C. Knights,et al.
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Factors Affecting Passage of Paddlefish through Dams in the Upper Mississippi River
,
2004
.
[8]
Daniel P. Loucks,et al.
Forecasting 3-D fish movement behavior using a Eulerian-Lagrangian-agent method (ELAM)
,
2006
.
[9]
Gene R. Ploskey,et al.
Development of an Operational, Full-Scale Fish Protection System at a Major Pumped-Storage Hydropower Dam
,
1995
.
[10]
L. Baumgartner,et al.
Lock gates improve passage of small-bodied fish and crustaceans in a low gradient vertical-slot fishway
,
2008
.
[11]
W. Bridges,et al.
Movement and population size of American shad near a low-head lock and dam
,
2004
.
[12]
Carl J. Walters,et al.
Large‐Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing
,
1990
.
[13]
Erich Emery,et al.
Detection of Temporal Trends in Ohio River Fish Assemblages Based on Lockchamber Surveys (1957-2001)
,
2004
.