Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests.

Forest structure and species composition in many western U.S. coniferous forests have been altered through fire exclusion, past and ongoing harvesting practices, and livestock grazing over the 20th century. The effects of these activities have been most pronounced in seasonally dry, low and mid-elevation coniferous forests that once experienced frequent, low to moderate intensity, fire regimes. In this paper, we report the effects of Fire and Fire Surrogate (FFS) forest stand treatments on fuel load profiles, potential fire behavior, and fire severity under three weather scenarios from six western U.S. FFS sites. This replicated, multisite experiment provides a framework for drawing broad generalizations about the effectiveness of prescribed fire and mechanical treatments on surface fuel loads, forest structure, and potential fire severity. Mechanical treatments without fire resulted in combined 1-, 10-, and 100-hour surface fuel loads that were significantly greater than controls at three of five FFS sites. Canopy cover was significantly lower than controls at three of five FFS sites with mechanical-only treatments and at all five FFS sites with the mechanical plus burning treatment; fire-only treatments reduced canopy cover at only one site. For the combined treatment of mechanical plus fire, all five FFS sites with this treatment had a substantially lower likelihood of passive crown fire as indicated by the very high torching indices. FFS sites that experienced significant increases in 1-, 10-, and 100-hour combined surface fuel loads utilized harvest systems that left all activity fuels within experimental units. When mechanical treatments were followed by prescribed burning or pile burning, they were the most effective treatment for reducing crown fire potential and predicted tree mortality because of low surface fuel loads and increased vertical and horizontal canopy separation. Results indicate that mechanical plus fire, fire-only, and mechanical-only treatments using whole-tree harvest systems were all effective at reducing potential fire severity under severe fire weather conditions. Retaining the largest trees within stands also increased fire resistance.

[1]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California's forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands , 2007 .

[2]  A. Youngblood,et al.  Changes in stand structure and composition after restoration treatments in low elevation dry forests of northeastern Oregon , 2006 .

[3]  D. Peterson,et al.  Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA , 2005 .

[4]  A. Taylor.  Fire regimes and forest changes in mid and upper montane forests of the southern Cascades, Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, U.S.A. , 2000 .

[5]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  Effectiveness of thinning and prescribed fire in reducing wildfire severity , 2004 .

[6]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  The influence of fuels treatment and landscape arrangement on simulated fire behavior, Southern Cascade range, California , 2008 .

[7]  Sierra Nevada Ecosystem,et al.  Assessments and scientific basis for management options , 1996 .

[8]  James K. Brown.  Handbook for inventorying downed woody material , 1974 .

[9]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity , 2004 .

[10]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments , 2005 .

[11]  James K. Agee,et al.  Thinning and Prescribed Fire Effects on Fuels and Potential Fire Behavior in an Eastern Cascades Forest, Washington, USA , 2006 .

[12]  Michael J. Gundale,et al.  Restoration treatments in a Montana ponderosa pine forest : Effects on soil physical, chemical and biological properties , 2005 .

[13]  W. Thies,et al.  Season of prescribed burn in ponderosa pine forests in eastern Oregon: impact on pine mortality , 2005 .

[14]  E. Pastor,et al.  Mathematical models and calculation systems for the study of wildland fire behaviour , 2003 .

[15]  J. Keeley,et al.  Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements , 2005 .

[16]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 1998 .

[17]  Paulo M. Fernandes,et al.  A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction , 2003 .

[18]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. , 1996 .

[19]  Russell T. Graham,et al.  Hayman Fire Case Study , 2003 .

[20]  A. C. Dibble,et al.  Does the Lack of Reference Ecosystems Limit Our Science? A Case Study in Nonnnative Invasive Plants as Forest Fuels , 2005, Journal of Forestry.

[21]  Joe H. Scott.  Comparison of crown fire modeling systems used in three fire management applications , 2006 .

[22]  C. Skinner.  Reintroducing fire into the Blacks Mountain Research Natural Area: effects on fire hazard , 2005 .

[23]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA , 2008 .

[24]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate , 2008 .

[25]  C. Brooks.  Climatic Change , 1913, Nature.

[26]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. , 2000 .

[27]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire , 2005 .

[28]  S. Stephens,et al.  Fire and fire surrogate treatment effects on leaf litter arthropods in a western Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest , 2006 .

[29]  T. Spies,et al.  Conserving Old‐Growth Forest Diversity in Disturbance‐Prone Landscapes , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[30]  D. Odion.  Fire in California's Ecosystems , 2007 .

[31]  Charles E. Keegan,et al.  Reducing Crown Fire Hazard in Fire-Adapted Forests of New Mexico , 2003 .

[32]  Klaus H. Barber,et al.  Stewardship and fireshed assessment: a process for designing a landscape fuel treatment strategy. , 2007 .

[33]  J. Agee.  The Fallacy of Passive Management Managing for Firesafe Forest Reserves , 2002 .

[34]  C. Skinner,et al.  Probability of tree survival after wildfire in an interior pine forest of northern California: Effects of thinning and prescribed fire , 2007 .

[35]  J. Agee,et al.  Annual and decadal climate forcing of historical fire regimes in the interior Pacific Northwest, USA , 2002 .

[36]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Natural variability in forests of the Grand Canyon, USA , 2002 .

[37]  J. W. Wagtendonk,et al.  An Overview of Fire in the Sierra Nevada , 1996 .

[38]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Climatic Change, Wildfire, and Conservation , 2004 .

[39]  E. Knapp,et al.  Fuel reduction and coarse woody debris dynamics with early season and late season prescribed fire in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest , 2005 .

[40]  J. Agee,et al.  Seasonal fire effects on mixed-conifer forest structure and ponderosa pine resin properties , 2006 .

[41]  C. E. Keegan,et al.  Overcoming America's Wood Deficit: An Overlooked Option , 2001 .

[42]  Philip N. Omi,et al.  Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests , 2002 .

[43]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  The economics of alternative fuel reduction treatments in western United States dry forests: Financial and policy implications from the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study , 2008 .

[44]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[45]  S. Stephens,et al.  Mechanized fuel treatment effects on soil compaction in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer stands , 2008 .

[46]  C. Fiedler,et al.  Understory response to fuel reduction treatments in the blue mountains of northeastern Oregon , 2004 .

[47]  Clinton S. Wright,et al.  Changes in fuelbed characteristics and resulting fire potentials after fuel reduction treatments in dry forests of the Blue Mountains, northeastern Oregon , 2008 .

[48]  April Rasala Lehman,et al.  A Guide to Statistical and Data Analysis Using JMP and JMP IN Software , 1999 .

[49]  Donald McKenzie,et al.  Forest Structure and Fire Hazard in Dry Forests of the Western United States , 2005 .

[50]  J. W. van Wagtendonk,et al.  Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers , 1998 .

[51]  S. Stephens,et al.  Managing natural wildfires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas , 2007 .

[52]  Christopher A. Wood,et al.  Wildfire Policy and Public Lands: Integrating Scientific Understanding with Social Concerns across Landscapes , 2004 .

[53]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Assessing Crown Fire Potential by Linking Models of Surface and Crown Fire Behavior , 2003 .

[54]  D. Sheil,et al.  Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures , 1999 .

[55]  S. Stephens,et al.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[56]  David J. Parsons,et al.  Impact of fire suppression on a mixed-conifer forest , 1979 .

[57]  Jw Van Wagdendonk,et al.  Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada conifers , 1996 .

[58]  Barbara A. Strom.  Pre-fire treatment effects and post-fire forest dynamics on the Rodeo-Chediski burn area, Arizona , 2005 .

[59]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Fuel treatment effects on snags and coarse woody debris in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest , 2005 .

[60]  S. Stephens,et al.  The National Fire and Fire Surrogate study: ecological consequences of fuel reduction methods in seasonally dry forests. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[61]  Dan Taylor,et al.  FIRE HISTORY OF A SEQUOIA-MIXED CONIFER FOREST' , 1979 .

[62]  Mimicking Nature's Fire: Restoring Fire-Prone Forests In The West , 2005 .

[63]  S. Arno.  Forest Fire History in the Northern Rockies , 1980, Journal of Forestry.

[64]  M. Finney.  Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[65]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras , 2005 .

[66]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments , 2001 .

[67]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  The National Fire and Fire Surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[68]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Interactions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area , 2009, Ecosystems.

[69]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires , 2005 .

[70]  Van Wagner.  The Line Intersect Method in Forest Fuel Sampling , 1968 .

[71]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest , 2005 .

[72]  S. Stephens,et al.  FEDERAL FOREST‐FIRE POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES , 2005 .

[73]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Silvicultural and reserve impacts on potential fire behavior and forest conservation: Twenty-five years of experience from Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests , 2005 .

[74]  S. Stephens,et al.  Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: Possible reference sites for management , 2005 .

[75]  D. Urban,et al.  MODELING THE EFFECTS OF FIRE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ON SIERRA NEVADA MIXED‐CONIFER FORESTS , 2000 .