COMPUGIRLS’ Standpoint

This article investigates the motivations of African American and Latino girls (N = 41) who navigate urban Southwest school districts during the day, but voluntarily attend a 2-year, culturally responsive multimedia program after school and into the summer. Understanding that girls from economically disadvantaged settings are indeed motivated to become technological innovators but often do not have access to the necessary resources to follow their interest, our program—entitled COMPUGIRLS—assumes a culturally responsive computing approach. This research examines particular features of the program (e.g., asset building, reflections, and connectedness) that attracted and retained the Latina (74%) and African American (19%) adolescent (ages 13-18) participants as well as to what extent the culturally relevant aspects of the curriculum assist with program retention and/or affect the students’ vision of themselves as a future technologist. An evaluative approach gathered 2 years of data from the participants. Field notes from observations and interviews were transcribed and reviewed to extract themes and areas of convergence. As a standpoint theory project, the authors center the girls’ voices as the primary data sources. Two primary themes emerged from the data to explain girls’ sustained motivation. The first was the challenge of learning and mastering the technology. For many, this also included disproving the stereotypes of their abilities by age, gender, and race. The second theme was being able to manipulate technology and learning experiences as a means of self-expression and research, particularly if the results could be used to inform their community and peers. The authors posit that much of the program impact was because of the culturally responsive practices (asset building, reflection, and connectedness) embedded within the curriculum. Implications for urban educators and program developers are considered.

[1]  J. Nurmi,et al.  Age differences in adolescent future-oriented goals, concerns, and related temporal extension in different sociocultural contexts , 1994 .

[2]  Morgaen L. Donaldson,et al.  Teach for América , 2012 .

[3]  K. Osterman Students' Need for Belonging in the School Community , 2000 .

[4]  J. Connell,et al.  Hanging in There: Behavioral, Psychological, and Contextual Factors Affecting Whether African American Adolescents Stay in High School , 1995 .

[5]  Culture, race and spirit: a reflective model for the study of African‐Americans , 2006 .

[6]  Cynthia B. Dillard The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership , 2000 .

[7]  Lorelle L. Espinosa,et al.  Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2011 .

[8]  D. Smith,et al.  The everyday world as problematic , 1987 .

[9]  Django Paris Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy , 2012 .

[10]  D. Gillborn,et al.  Critical Perspectives on Race and Schooling , 2009 .

[11]  Dianna L. Stone,et al.  Relations Among Ethnicity, Gender, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intention to Pursue a Career in Information Technology , 2008 .

[12]  K. Scott Lessons learned: research within an urban, African American district , 2012 .

[13]  S. Harding Standpoint Theories: Productively Controversial , 2009, Hypatia.

[14]  Denice Ward Hood,et al.  CompuGirls: designing a culturally relevant technology program , 2009 .

[15]  C. Harnois Race, Gender, and the Black Women’s Standpoint , 2010 .

[16]  N. Augustine Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[17]  Frim Ampaw,et al.  Gender matters: An examination of differential effects of the college experience on degree attainment in STEM , 2011 .

[18]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest , 2010, Sex roles.

[19]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  New Directions in Multicultural Education Complexities , Boundaries , and Critical Race Theory , 2010 .

[20]  Chungmei Lee,et al.  Why Segregation Matters: Poverty and Educational Inequality , 2005 .

[21]  M. Joy Research Methods in Education (6th Edition) , 2007 .

[22]  R. Estrella,et al.  Stuck in the Shallow End Education , Race , and Computing , 2008 .

[23]  K. Crenshaw Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color , 1991 .

[24]  Christian Sandvig Wireless Play and Unexpected Innovation , 2012 .

[25]  Katariina Salmela-Aro,et al.  Social strategies and loneliness: A prospective study , 1997 .

[26]  Tamara Lucas,et al.  Diversifying the Teacher Workforce: A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[27]  J. Husman,et al.  Title: Motivation and Culturally Responsive Technology for COMPUGIRLS , 2011 .

[28]  Patricia Hill Collins,et al.  Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought , 1986 .

[29]  Debra Viadero Researchers Mull STEM Gender Gap. , 2009 .

[30]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Social Cognitive Predictors of Academic Interests and Goals in Engineering: Utility for Women and Students at Historically Black Universities. , 2005 .

[31]  J. Banks The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education. , 2011 .

[32]  Carol D. Lee Culture, Literacy, & Learning: Taking Bloom in the Midst of the Whirlwind , 2007 .

[33]  Gloria J. Ladson-Billings,et al.  Critical race theory perspectives on the social studies : the profession, policies, and curriculum , 2003 .

[34]  Joanna Goode,et al.  If You Build Teachers, Will Students Come? The Role of Teachers in Broadening Computer Science Learning for Urban Youth , 2007 .

[35]  Bertram C. Bruce Crossing the digital divide: Race, writing, and technology in the classroom, by Barbara Monroe [book review] , 2005 .

[36]  Frederick L. Smyth,et al.  Ethnic and Gender Differences in Science Graduation at Selective Colleges with Implications for Admission Policy and College Choice , 2004 .