Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations

[1] It is well known that regional climate simulations are sensitive to the size and position of the domain chosen for calculations. Here we study the physical mechanisms of this sensitivity. We conducted simulations with the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) for June 2000 over North America at 50 km horizontal resolution using a 7500 km × 5400 km grid and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis as boundary conditions. The position of the domain was displaced in several directions, always maintaining the U.S. in the interior, out of the buffer zone along the lateral boundaries. Circulation biases developed a large scale structure, organized by the Rocky Mountains, resulting from a systematic shifting of the synoptic wave trains that crossed the domain. The distortion of the large-scale circulation was produced by interaction of the modeled flow with the lateral boundaries of the nested domain and varied when the position of the grid was altered. This changed the large-scale environment among the different simulations and translated into diverse conditions for the development of the mesoscale processes that produce most of precipitation for the Great Plains in the summer season. As a consequence, precipitation results varied, sometimes greatly, among the experiments with the different grid positions. To eliminate the dependence of results on the position of the domain, we used spectral nudging of waves longer than 2500 km above the boundary layer. Moisture was not nudged at any level. This constrained the synoptic scales to follow reanalysis while allowing the model to develop the small-scale dynamics responsible for the rainfall. Nudging of the large scales successfully eliminated the variation of precipitation results when the grid was moved. We suggest that this technique is necessary for all downscaling studies with regional models with domain sizes of a few thousand kilometers and larger embedded in global models.

[1]  Richard G. Jones,et al.  Simulation of climate change over europe using a nested regional‐climate model. I: Assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries , 1995 .

[2]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[3]  Ronald M. Errico,et al.  Spectra Computed from a Limited Area Grid , 1985 .

[4]  Richard H. Johnson.  The Role of Convective-Scale Precipitation Downdrafts in Cumulus and Synoptic-Scale Interactions , 1976 .

[5]  F. Giorgi.  Simulation of Regional Climate Using a Limited Area Model Nested in a General Circulation Model , 1990 .

[6]  A. Robock,et al.  Regional Climate Simulations over North America: Interaction of Local Processes with Improved Large-Scale Flow , 2005 .

[7]  R. Treadon,et al.  A Tutorial on Lateral Boundary Conditions as a Basic and Potentially Serious Limitation to Regional Numerical Weather Prediction , 1997 .

[8]  John S. Kain,et al.  Convective parameterization for mesoscale models : The Kain-Fritsch Scheme , 1993 .

[9]  A. Robock,et al.  Spectral Nudging to Improve Climate Downscaling over North America Using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System ( RAMS ) , 2003 .

[10]  Modulation of the Great Plains low‐level jet and moisture transports by orography and large‐scale circulations , 2003 .

[11]  S. P. DeSordi,et al.  Global variable resolution simulations of Mississippi River basin rains of summer 1993 , 1999 .

[12]  R. Pielke,et al.  A Climate Version of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System , 2000 .

[13]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[14]  John D. Horel,et al.  Sensitivity of a Spectrally Filtered and Nudged Limited-Area Model to Outer Model Options , 1996 .

[15]  H. Davies,et al.  A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. [numerical weather forecasting , 1976 .

[16]  A. Staniforth,et al.  Regional modeling: A theoretical discussion , 1997 .

[17]  K. Emanuel,et al.  The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models , 1993 .

[18]  J. Kain,et al.  A One-Dimensional Entraining/Detraining Plume Model and Its Application in Convective Parameterization , 1990 .

[19]  Richard C. J. Somerville,et al.  On the use of a coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations , 1975 .

[20]  Ronald M. Errico,et al.  The Influence of Artificial and Physical Factors upon Predictability Estimates Using a Complex Limited-Area Model , 1990 .

[21]  R. Arritt,et al.  Effects of quasi‐stationary large‐scale anomalies on some mesoscale features associated with the 1993 flood: A regional model simulation , 2000 .

[22]  Renato Ramos da Silva,et al.  Project to Intercompare Regional Climate Simulations (PIRCS): Description and initial results , 1999 .

[23]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Coupled Atmosphere–Biophysics–Hydrology Models for Environmental Modeling , 2000 .

[24]  G. Mellor,et al.  A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers. , 1974 .

[25]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A regional climate model for the western United States , 1989 .

[26]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Development of a Regional Climate Model for U.S. Midwest Applications. Part I: Sensitivity to Buffer Zone Treatment , 2001 .

[27]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  A Uniform- and Variable-Resolution Stretched-Grid GCM Dynamical Core with Realistic Orography , 2000 .

[28]  Klaus Dethloff,et al.  On the sensitivity of a regional Arctic climate model to initial and boundary conditions , 2000 .

[29]  Ramond Eeli Aa Ndrenelaprise,et al.  Forecasting Skill Limits of Nested, Limited-Area Models: A Perfect-Model Approach , 2002 .

[30]  W. J. Steenburgh,et al.  Short-Term Forecast Validation of Six Models , 1999 .

[31]  J. Harrington,et al.  The effects of radiative and microphysical processes on simulated warm and transition season arctic stratus , 1997 .

[32]  R. Bernstein,et al.  Sea surface temperature estimation using the NOAA 6 satellite advanced very high resolution radiometer , 1982 .

[33]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Introduction to special section : Regional climate modeling revisited , 1999 .

[34]  W. Cotton,et al.  RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions , 2003 .

[35]  F. Giorgi,et al.  The Effects of Domain Choice on Summer Precipitation Simulation and Sensitivity in a Regional Climate Model , 1998 .

[36]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for Climate , 2002 .

[37]  H. Storch,et al.  A Spectral Nudging Technique for Dynamical Downscaling Purposes , 2000 .