A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: Conceptual development, empirical validation and application

Abstract Building Information Modelling (BIM) is an innovation that is transforming practices within the Architectural, Engineering, Construction and Operation (AECO) sectors. Many studies have investigated the process of BIM adoption and diffusion and in particular, the drivers affecting adoption at different levels, ranging from individual and team through organisations and supply chains to whole market level. However, in-depth investigations of the stages of the BIM adoption process and the drivers, factors and determinants affecting such stages are still lacking. A comprehensive classification and integration of adoption drivers and factors is absent as these are disjointedly identified across disparate studies. There is also limited attention to the key terms and concepts (i.e. readiness, implementation, diffusion, adoption) in this area of study. This aim in this paper is twofold: (1) to develop and validate a Unified BIM Adoption Taxonomy (UBAT); and (2) to identify the taxonomy's constructs (i.e. three driver clusters and their 17 factors) that have influence on the first three stages of the BIM adoption process namely, awareness, interest, and decision stages, and compare their effects on each of the stages. The research uses: a systematic literature review and knowledge synthesisation to develop the taxonomy; a confirmatory factor analysis for its validation; and an ordinal logistic regression to test the effect of the UBAT's constructs on the BIM adoption process within the UK Architectural sector using a sample of 177 organisations. The paper is primarily intended to enhance the reader's understanding of the BIM adoption process and the constructs that influence its stages. The taxonomy and its sets of drivers and determinants can be used to perform various analyses of the BIM adoption process, delivering evidence and insights for decision makers within organisations and across whole market when formulating BIM diffusion strategies.

[1]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[2]  Ruben Vrijhoef,et al.  The interdependences of BIM and supply chain partnering: empirical explorations , 2016 .

[3]  M. Abubakar,et al.  Contractors Perception of the Factors Affecting Building Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption in the Nigerian Construction Industry , 2014 .

[4]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Needs and technology adoption: observation from BIM experience , 2015 .

[5]  S. Murray,et al.  Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process , 2007 .

[6]  D. Walker,et al.  Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: a micro analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Ming-Chih Tsai,et al.  A study of the institutional forces influencing the adoption intention of RFID by suppliers , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Hyojoo Son,et al.  What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects' behavioral intentions , 2015 .

[9]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  On alternative strategies for doing research in the management and social sciences , 1988 .

[10]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Producing a systematic review. , 2009 .

[11]  Heng Li,et al.  Impacts of Isomorphic Pressures on BIM Adoption in Construction Projects , 2014 .

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[13]  Antonio Grilo,et al.  Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015 , 2017 .

[14]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  Taxonomy for change causes and effects in construction projects , 2009 .

[15]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[16]  Andrew M. Farrell,et al.  Insufficient Discriminant Validity: A Comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty and Shiu (2009) , 2008 .

[17]  Heng Li,et al.  Linking the Motivations and Practices of Design Organizations to Implement Building Information Modeling in Construction Projects: Empirical Study in China , 2016 .

[18]  Barry Gledson,et al.  Investigating the diffusion of 4D BIM Innovation , 2015 .

[19]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Macro-BIM adoption: Conceptual structures , 2015 .

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building Information Modeling: Analyzing Noteworthy Publications of Eight Countries Using a Knowledge Content Taxonomy , 2015 .

[23]  Chris Harty,et al.  Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach , 2005 .

[24]  Steven D. Sheetz,et al.  The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Hsin-Chieh Wu,et al.  Determinants of RFID adoption intention: Evidence from Taiwanese retail chains , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Barbara H. Kwasnik,et al.  The Role of Classification in Knowledge Representation and Discovery , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[27]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  A Critical Realist Guide to Developing Theory with Systematic Literature Reviews , 2012 .

[30]  Meng-Han Tsai,et al.  Developing critical success factors for the assessment of BIM technology adoption: Part II. Analysis and results , 2014 .

[31]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  BIM Education and Recruiting: Survey-Based Comparative Analysis of Issues, Perceptions, and Collaboration Opportunities , 2014 .

[32]  Heng Li,et al.  Practices and effectiveness of building information modelling in construction projects in China , 2015 .

[33]  Naleef Fareed,et al.  The influence of institutional pressures on hospital electronic health record presence. , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[34]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Adoption of BIM by architectural firms in India: technology–organization–environment perspective , 2016 .

[35]  Krzysztof Zima,et al.  Prospects for the use of BIM in Poland and the Czech Republic – preliminary research results , 2015 .

[36]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[37]  Ely Laureano Paiva,et al.  Organizational knowledge and the manufacturing strategy process: A resource‐based view analysis , 2008 .

[38]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[39]  Ibrahim Yitmen,et al.  The challenge of change for innovation in construction: A North Cyprus perspective , 2007 .

[40]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A tertiary study , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[41]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  A user-centered taxonomy for specifying mixed reality systems for aec industry , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[42]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[43]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[44]  Majharul Talukder,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of technological innovation by individual employees: An Australian study , 2012 .

[45]  Nicholas Chileshe,et al.  Adopting global virtual engineering teams in AEC projects : a qualitative meta-analysis of innovation diffusion studies , 2015 .

[46]  E. Waarts,et al.  The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations , 2002 .

[47]  Gaguk Margono,et al.  Multidimensional Reliability of Instrument for Measuring Students' Attitudes Toward Statistics by Using Semantic Differential Scale , 2015 .

[48]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Literature Reviews and the Review Process: An Editor-in-Chief's Perspective , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  D. Zuppa Raja R.A. Issa,et al.  ALIGNING INTERESTS KEY TO DEVELOPING TRUST IN DEPLOYING COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN CONSTRUCTION , 2008 .

[50]  Catherine E. Connelly,et al.  Understanding Nonmalicious Security Violations in the Workplace: A Composite Behavior Model , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Byungtae Lee,et al.  Empirical analysis of risk-taking behavior in IT platform migration decisions , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Jason Potts,et al.  Micro-meso-macro , 2004 .

[53]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[54]  Kerry London,et al.  Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry , 2010 .

[55]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization , 2017 .

[56]  Sangyoon Chin,et al.  Assessment of BIM acceptance degree of Korean AEC participants , 2016 .

[57]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[58]  William R. King,et al.  Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Mumtaz Abdul Hameed,et al.  ADOPTION PROCESS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) INNOVATIONS IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2012 .

[60]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism , 1999 .

[61]  Mohamad Kassem,et al.  A Conceptual Model for Investigating BIM Adoption by Organisations , 2017 .

[62]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Human Factors Analysis Classification System Relating to Human Error Awareness Taxonomy in Construction Safety , 2009 .

[64]  K. Wei,et al.  The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet‐enabled supply chain management systems , 2010 .

[65]  Aj Marshall-Ponting,et al.  Building Information Modelling: a case study approach to identify readiness criteria for process requirement. , 2014 .

[66]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[67]  Meghdad Attarzadeh,et al.  Identifying key factors for building information modelling adoption in Singapore , 2015 .

[68]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[69]  Abdul Hadi Nawawi,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM): A New Paradigm for Quality of Life Within Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry , 2013 .

[70]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Methods for Integrative Reviews , 1980 .

[71]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: A bibliometric-qualitative literature review , 2017 .

[72]  Jeffery A. LePine,et al.  Editors' comments: Developing Novel Theoretical Insight from Reviews of Existing Theory and Research , 2010 .

[73]  Justus J. Randolph.  A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. , 2009 .

[74]  Senthilkumar Venkatachalam,et al.  Reflection on BIM Development Practices at the Pre-maturity , 2015 .

[75]  Ahmed Younis Alsabawy,et al.  Measuring E-Learning Systems Success , 2014 .

[76]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building Information Modelling Maturity Matrix , 2010 .

[77]  Lizhong Peng,et al.  Applying institutional theory to the adoption of electronic health records in the U.S , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[78]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: a China study , 2015 .

[79]  Willy Sher,et al.  Measuring BIM performance: Five metrics , 2012 .

[80]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[81]  Jeffrey Soar,et al.  E-learning service delivery quality: a determinant of user satisfaction , 2013 .

[82]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[83]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change , 1998 .

[84]  Christopher Nigel Preece,et al.  Adoption of Building Information Modelling technology (BIM): Perspectives from Malaysian engineering consulting services firms , 2015 .

[85]  Shoude Li,et al.  Users-orientated evaluation of building information model in the Chinese construction industry , 2014 .

[86]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[87]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations , 2001 .

[88]  Jennifer A. Byrne.  Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews , 2016, Research Integrity and Peer Review.

[89]  David Greenwood,et al.  The adoption of 4D BIM in the UK construction industry: an innovation diffusion approach , 2017 .

[90]  Vishal Singh,et al.  Integrated construction supply chain design and delivery solutions , 2013 .

[91]  S. Counsell,et al.  A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations , 2012 .

[92]  Z. Irani,et al.  Analysing supply chain integration through a systematic literature review: a normative perspective , 2014 .

[93]  Lawrence Seed,et al.  The dynamics of BIM adoption : a mixed methods study of BIM as an innovation within the United Kingdom construction industry , 2015 .

[94]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  A stage-based diffusion of IT innovation and the BSC performance impact: A moderator of technology–organization–environment , 2014 .

[95]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Macro BIM adoption: Comparative market analysis , 2017 .