Multimedia Technology in the Financial Services Sector: Customer Satisfaction with Alternatives to Face-to-Face Interaction in Mortgage Sales

Participants N=71 took part in mortgage interviews with a human agent interacting with a computer using four different communication modes: a standard video ink, a video link with video-data, the telephone and face-to-face. Video-plus-data came significantly higher in the rankings than phone. It is argued that video-plus-data was found to be more useful than phone, as it provided the participants with more feedback on their mortgage negotiation. Usability and preference were highest for face-to-face. Usability of video was significantly higher than video-plus-data. Comments made by the participants suggest that this may have been due to the split-attention effect and it is argued that this could be diminished by usability improvements. There were no significant differences in usability between the two video services and the telephone. Reasons for this are explored. Differences between genders were also discovered with the phone being judged to be less usable by male participants. If face-to-face mortgage interviews are to be supplemented by other communication channels then users would find video-plus-data the most acceptable, but there is much room for further improvements in usability.

[1]  Lynne Coventry,et al.  The effects of visual proxemic information in video mediated communication , 1998, SGCH.

[2]  J. Short.  Effects of Medium of Communication on Experimental Negotiation , 1974 .

[3]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  Interactive human communication , 1975 .

[4]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Co-ordinating activity: an analysis of interaction in computer-supported co-operative work , 1991, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[5]  Jan Maarten Schraagen,et al.  On the passage of time: Temporal differences in video-mediated and face-to-face interaction , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  One is not enough: multiple views in a media space , 1993, INTERCHI.

[7]  Z. Smoreda,et al.  Gender-specific use of the domestic telephone , 2000 .

[8]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Studies in Interactive Communication: I. The Effects of Four Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Cooperative Problem-Solving , 1972 .

[9]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  The Role of the Face in Communication: Implications for Videophone Design , 1996, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Joseph B. Sidowski,et al.  Measurements of computer satisfaction, literacy, and aptitudes: A review , 1990, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Human communication in customer-agent-computer interaction: Face-to-face versus over telephone , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[13]  Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon,et al.  Impact of Video-Mediated Communication on Simulated Service Encounters , 1996, Interact. Comput..

[14]  Mervyn A. Jack,et al.  A usability comparison of three alternative message formats for an SMS banking service , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Like, Share, Recommend: Smartphones as a Self-Broadcast and Self-Promotion Medium of College Students , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[16]  Fergus McInnes,et al.  The mediating effects of brand music and waiting time updates on customers' satisfaction with a telephone service when put on‐hold , 2009 .

[17]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings , 1988, CSCW '88.

[18]  A. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Dialogue and Performance in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task , 1994 .

[19]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Using Different Communication Media in Requirements Negotiation , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[21]  Thomas D. Fletcher,et al.  The Effects of Communication Modality on Performance and Self-Ratings of Teamwork Components , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  D. Rutter,et al.  Visual communication and the content and style of conversation. , 1981, The British journal of social psychology.

[23]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[24]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Things to Talk About When Talking About Things , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  The Effects of 10 Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Co-Operative Problem-Solving , 1974, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Mehdi Khosrowpour.  Cases on the Human Side of Information Technology , 2006 .

[27]  Vesa Puhakka,et al.  The Many Sides of Human Resource Information Systems , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[28]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[29]  Mervyn A. Jack,et al.  Usable security: User preferences for authentication methods in eBanking and the effects of experience , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[30]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations , 1992, CHI.

[31]  Mervyn A. Jack,et al.  Functionality and usability in design for eStatements in eBanking services , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[32]  Ben Anderson,et al.  Interacting with the telephone , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[34]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Communication patterns during synchronous Web-based military training in problem solving , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[36]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Video-as-data: Technical and social aspects of a collaborative multimedia application , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[37]  Téléphone, communication et sociabilité: des pratiques résidentielles différenciées , 1993 .

[38]  Masood Masoodian,et al.  Video Support for Shared Work-Space Interaction: An Empirical Study , 1995, Interact. Comput..

[39]  Mark Apperley,et al.  User Perceptions of Human-to-Human Communication Modes in CSCW Environments , 2007 .

[40]  Steve Draper,et al.  Questionnaires as a software evaluation tool , 1983, CHI '83.

[41]  A. Moyal.  The gendered use of the telephone: an Australian case study , 1992 .

[42]  John C. Tang,et al.  What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study , 2005, Multimedia Systems.

[43]  D. Tannen.  You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[44]  Yeung,et al.  Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise: Split-Attention and Redundancy Effects in Reading with Explanatory Notes , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[45]  Andrea Basso,et al.  Interpersonal trust and common ground in electronically mediated communication , 2000, CSCW '00.

[46]  Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon,et al.  Comparison of Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Interaction , 1996, Interact. Comput..

[47]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Experiences in the use of a media space , 1991, CHI.

[48]  John C. Tang,et al.  Why do users like video? , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[49]  James N. Anderson,et al.  On the role of metaphor and language in design of third party payments in eBanking: Usability and quality , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[50]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  Video data and video links in mediated communication: what do users value? , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Shared Workspaces: How Do They Work and When Are They Useful? , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[52]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Human computer interaction : concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications , 2009 .

[53]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[54]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Telephone operators as knowledge workers: consultants who meet customer needs , 1995, CHI '95.

[55]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Remote assistance: a view of the work and a view of the face? , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.