Effect of dimensions and volume of the prostate on cancer detection rate of 12 core prostate biopsy

PurposeTo evaluate if volume or any of the three dimensions of prostate influences cancer detection rate by 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy.Materials and methodsWe have searched our database for patients who underwent 12 core TRUS guided prostate biopsy with PSA values between 4.0 and 9.9 ng/ml, benign digital exam and no suspicious lesions at TRUS. The measurements of three dimensions and volume of the prostate of 99 patients were correlated with cancer detection rates of biopsy.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between patients with prostate cancer or with benign histopathologic result for mean age, PSA and % PSA. Patients without cancer had a significantly higher mean prostate volume (58.88 cc) than patients with cancer (48.85 cc) (P = 0.038). A volume of 48.5 cc was determined as a cut-off value above which cancer detection rate decreases. Of the three dimensions, only the difference for the craniocaudal dimension between benign and malignant groups was marginally significant (P = 0.052).ConclusionsWith 12 core biopsy, cancer detection rate is lower in patients with prostates larger than 48.5 cc. Further studies comparing biopsy results with prostatectomy specimens can clarify whether these results necessitates higher number of cores for such patients.

[1]  J. Oesterling,et al.  A model for the number of cores per prostate biopsy based on patient age and prostate gland volume. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[2]  D. Johnston,et al.  A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[3]  K. Shinohara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[4]  John T. Wei,et al.  The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. , 1995, Urology.

[5]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[6]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[7]  C. Bangma,et al.  Repeat screening for prostate cancer after 1-year followup in 984 biopsied men: clinical and pathological features of detected cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Brawer,et al.  How to use prostate‐specific antigen in the early detection orscreening for prostatic carcinoma , 1995, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  T. Stamey,et al.  Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. , 1995, Urology.

[10]  M. Brawer,et al.  The effect of prostate volume on the yield of needle biopsy. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[11]  M M Elhilali,et al.  Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. , 1997, Urology.

[12]  Mesut Remzi,et al.  Repeat prostate biopsy: who, how and when?. a review. , 2002, European urology.

[13]  K. Shinohara,et al.  The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. , 2000, The Journal of urology.