Measuring the obsolescence of office property through a user based appraisal of building quality

Buildings are constructed in circumstances of high uncertainty concerning their medium to long term lives. However, the act of construction is a commitment to physical permanency and spatial fixity. This, together with the fact that most buildings are durable, means that they have to function in changing political, economic, social and technological conditions. The result is that every building undergoes a process of obsolescence as it exhibits a diminishing capability to meet evolving user expectations through time. In recent decades, the process of building obsolescence has been particularly problematic for office property, as building life spans have become increasingly ephemeral (Gann, 2000). Technological advances and changing occupier needs have resulted in many office buildings being demolished after only 20 years life (Khalid, 1993). Furthermore, due to rapid innovation and development, future office buildings are likely to enjoy even shorter useful life spans. Such a trend is considered to represent a widespread inefficiency in the use of physical resources, the costs of which are borne by property owners, occupiers and non-users. The trend has implications for the way in which office buildings are designed and managed. Previous studies into office property obsolescence have focused almost entirely upon the financial impact for the property owner (Baum, 1991; Khalid, 1993). However, the limitations of this traditional approach have become increasingly apparent (Pinder and Wilkinson, 2000). The research discussed in this paper suggests that building obsolescence in office property can be examined from the perspective of the building occupant. In so doing, the research explores the gap that develops between the expected and perceived utility of office property, the results of which will form the basis of a model for highlighting approaching problems of building obsolescence in public sector operational property. Such a model will be of practical worth in assisting facilities managers and designers to minimise the risk of building obsolescence. Both theoretical and methodological issues pertaining to the research undergo critical discussion in this paper, and the underlying aims and objectives are examined. The paper considers the first round of empirical research currently nearing completion, and before concluding, maps out the continuing programme of research.

[1]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn , 1994 .

[2]  Andrew C. Lemer,et al.  INFRASTRUCTURE OBSOLESCENCE AND DESIGN SERVICE LIFE , 1996 .

[3]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better , 1995 .

[4]  P. Osborne,et al.  The working environment: Catalyst or constraint? , 1999 .

[5]  Francis Salway,et al.  Depreciation of commercial property , 1986 .

[6]  T. Dixon,et al.  A critical review of methodologies for measuring rental depreciation applied to UK commercial real estate , 1999 .

[7]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Improving the measurement of service quality , 1993 .

[8]  Andrew Baum Quality and Property Performance , 1994 .

[9]  Mike Hoxley,et al.  Measuring UK construction professional service quality: the what, how, when and who , 2000 .

[10]  Barrie Chanter,et al.  Building Maintenance Management , 1996 .

[11]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  The effects of organisational workplace dynamics and building infrastructure flexibility on environmental and technical quality in offices , 1999 .

[12]  David Gann,et al.  Building Innovation: Complex Constructs in a Changing World , 2000 .

[13]  Andrew Baum,et al.  Property Investment Depreciation and Obsolescence , 1991 .

[14]  James Douglas,et al.  Building performance and its relevance to facilities management , 1996 .

[15]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension , 1992 .

[16]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions , 1993 .

[17]  J. J. Chilton,et al.  The effects of integrated workplace strategies on commercial office space , 1997 .

[18]  Anne Aikivuori Periods and demand for private sector housing refurbishment , 1996 .

[19]  Bruce Walker,et al.  Obsolescence in housing. Theory and applications , 1976 .

[20]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality , 1994 .

[21]  J. Bryson Obsolescence and the Process of Creative Reconstruction , 1997 .

[22]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[23]  George Baird Building evaluation techniques , 1995 .

[24]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[25]  John Raftery Principles of Building Economics: An Introduction , 1991 .