Electronic Mail as a Pedagogical Delivery System: An Analysis of the Learning of Argumentation

The article reports a study in which 31 volunteered Finnish undergraduate students practiced argumentation by electronic mail (e-mail). Generally argumentation refers to grounding of stated claims. The study seeks to clarify the feasibility of e-mail study environment for practicing argumentation and compares a tutor-led seminar mode and self-directed student discussion mode, using e-mail as the study tool in both modes. The data consisted of the students' 441 e-mail messages. The content analysis of the data focused on the level and development of argumentation and counterargumentation in the messages. The results indicated that the messages' level of argumentation improved during the experiment and was higher in those messages that included counterargumentation targeted against others' standpoints. In addition, the students engaged in the student-led mode of e-mail study presented more and higher-level counterargumentation compared to the students engaged in the tutor-led mode. The results suggested that e-mail is a feasible study tool in practicing academic argumentation and that, given that this is an important aim in higher education, students' self-direction and debating should be encouraged.

[1]  D. Kember,et al.  Does higher education promote independent learning? , 1990 .

[2]  James McCullough,et al.  Computer conferencing as a support mechanism for teacher-researchers in rural high schools , 1992 .

[3]  John J. Kennedy,et al.  Applying Log-Linear Models in Educational Research , 1988 .

[4]  Robert H. Ennis,et al.  Evaluating Critical Thinking , 1989 .

[5]  Robin Mason,et al.  Evaluation Methodologies for Computer Conferencing Applications , 1992 .

[6]  J. H. McMillan,et al.  Enhancing college students' critical thinking: A review of studies , 1987 .

[7]  Caroline Golder,et al.  Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends , 1994 .

[8]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Argumentation Course by Electronic Mail. , 1997 .

[9]  Erling B. Andersen,et al.  Discrete Statistical Models with Social Science Applications. , 1980 .

[10]  Rosalie Wells.  The use of computer-mediated communication in distance education: progress, problems and trends , 1993, Teleteaching.

[11]  William J. Seaton,et al.  Computer‐Mediated Communication and student self‐directed learning , 1993 .

[12]  S. Toulmin,et al.  An introduction to reasoning , 1979 .

[13]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  What If--: Toward Excellence in Reasoning , 1991 .

[14]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Teaching Argumentation Skills in an Electronic Mail Environment , 1997 .

[15]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills , 1995 .

[16]  Robin Mason.  Designing collaborative work for online courses , 1993, Teleteaching.

[17]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Assessing argumentation skills among finnish university students , 1994 .

[18]  J. Arfield,et al.  Flexible learning in higher education , 1996 .

[19]  P. Goodyear,et al.  Flexible learning in higher education: the use of computer-mediated communications , 1994 .

[20]  Trudy W. Banta,et al.  Toward a Plan for Using National Assessment To Ensure Continuous Improvement of Higher Education. Draft. , 1991 .

[21]  Nancy E. Hansen,et al.  Teaching Graduate Psychology Seminars Using Electronic Mail: Creative Distance Education , 1996 .

[22]  James A. Levin,et al.  Real and non‐real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse∗ , 1983 .

[23]  Mary C. McComb.  Benefits of computer‐mediated communication in college courses , 1994 .

[24]  Dennis K. Smeltzer,et al.  Computer-mediated communication: an analysis of the relationship of message structure and message intent , 1992 .

[25]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The analysis of cross-classified categorical data , 1980 .

[26]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation. , 1991 .

[27]  Elizabeth J. Burge,et al.  Learning in a computer conferenced contexts: The learner''s perspective , 2008 .

[28]  Scott A. Kuehn.  Computer‐mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda , 1994 .

[29]  J. Foertsch.  The impact of electronic networks on scholarly communication: Avenues for research , 1995 .

[30]  Terence C. Ahern,et al.  The Effects of Teacher Discourse in Computer-Mediated Discussion , 1992 .

[31]  Kent R. Colbert.  The Effects of CEDA and NDT Debate Training on Critical Thinking Ability. , 1987 .

[32]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  Quantitative data analysis for social scientists , 1990 .

[33]  D. Perkins.  Knowledge As Design , 1986 .

[34]  Sharon L. Pugh.  Using Case Studies and Collaborative Computer-Assisted Communication to Support Conceptual Learning in a Teacher-Education Course on Critical Reading. , 1993 .

[35]  Miika Marttunen.  Commenting on Written Arguments as a Part of Argumentation Skills — comparison between students engaged in traditional vs on‐line study , 1992 .

[36]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[37]  Thomas Atwater.  Critical Thinking in Basic U.S. Government Classes. , 1991 .

[38]  Paul J. Baker,et al.  Teaching students to think critically , 1988 .

[39]  Anthony Kaye,et al.  Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing , 1992, NATO ASI Series.

[40]  Ernest T. Pascarella.  The Development of Critical Thinking: Does College Make a Difference? ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. , 1987 .

[41]  J. W. McCormick,et al.  Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail , 1992 .