Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.

Triple-rule-out (TRO) computed tomographic (CT) angiography can provide a cost-effective evaluation of the coronary arteries, aorta, pulmonary arteries, and adjacent intrathoracic structures for the patient with acute chest pain. TRO CT is most appropriate for the patient who is judged to be at low to intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and whose symptoms may also be attributed to acute pathologic conditions of the aorta or pulmonary arteries. Although a regular cardiac rhythm remains an important factor in coronary CT image quality, newer CT scanners with 64 or more detector rows afford rapid electrocardiographically (ECG) gated imaging to provide high-quality TRO CT studies in patients with a heart rate of up to 80 beats per minute. Injection of iodinated contrast material (< or = 100 mL) is tailored to provide simultaneous high levels of arterial enhancement in the coronary arteries and aorta (> 300 HU) and in the pulmonary arteries (> 200 HU). To limit radiation exposure, the TRO CT examination does not include the entire chest but is constrained to incorporate the aortic arch down through the heart. Scanning parameters, including prospective ECG tube current modulation and prospective ECG gating with the "step-and-shoot" technique, are tailored to reduce radiation exposure (optimally, 5-9 mSv). When performed with appropriate attention to timing and technique, TRO CT provides coronary image quality equal to that of dedicated coronary CT angiography and pulmonary arterial images that are free of motion artifact related to cardiac pulsation. In an appropriately selected emergency department patient population, TRO CT can safely eliminate the need for further diagnostic testing in over 75% of patients.

[1]  G D Rubin,et al.  Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[2]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[3]  William W O'Neill,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  K. Bis,et al.  Enhancement Performance of a 64-Slice Triple Rule-Out Protocol vs 16-Slice and 10-Slice Multidetector CT-Angiography Protocols for Evaluation of Aortic and Pulmonary Vasculature , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac nuclear and radiography procedures , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  Rémy Morello,et al.  Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography--meta-analysis. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  J. Brink,et al.  Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  E. Paulson,et al.  Emergency department imaging: current practice. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[9]  H. Hecht,et al.  How much calcium is too much calcium for coronary computerized tomographic angiography? , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[10]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Contrast Bolus Optimization for Cardiac 16-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison of Contrast Medium Formulations Containing 300 and 400 Milligrams of Iodine Per Milliliter , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[11]  M. Clouse,et al.  ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and tri-phasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain , 2008, European Radiology.

[12]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Italian multicenter, prospective study to evaluate the negative predictive value of 16- and 64-slice MDCT imaging in patients scheduled for coronary angiography (NIMISCAD-Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease) , 2009, European Radiology.

[13]  M. Clouse,et al.  ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and tri-phasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain , 2007, European Radiology.

[14]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  Emergency physicians' fear of malpractice in evaluating patients with possible acute cardiac ischemia. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  M. Reiser,et al.  Optimization of cardiac MSCT contrast injection protocols: dependency of the main bolus contrast density on test bolus parameters and patients' body weight. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[16]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Masao Kiguchi,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[18]  G. Raff,et al.  Use of multislice CT for the evaluation of emergency room patients with chest pain: The so‐called “Triple rule‐out” , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[19]  A. Yoo,et al.  Transient Interruption of Contrast on CT Pulmonary Angiography: Proof of Mechanism , 2007, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[20]  W. Gibler,et al.  The role of cardiac risk factor burden in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department setting. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[21]  W. Baxt,et al.  Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  L. Hillis,et al.  Cardiovascular complications of cocaine use. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  I. Sand Litigation against the emergency physician. Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction , 1990 .

[24]  R. Khare,et al.  Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[25]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. , 2005, Radiology.

[26]  M. Synnestvedt,et al.  Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[27]  J. Murray,et al.  Diagnosis of pulmonary emboli and image quality at CT pulmonary angiography: influence of imaging direction with multidetector CT. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[28]  W. Gibler,et al.  Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[29]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Ne Pacific Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose , 2008 .

[32]  2007 Chronic Angina Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina , 2007 .

[33]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Meta-analysis of 40- and 64-MDCT angiography for assessing coronary artery stenosis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  B. Lewis,et al.  Usefulness of 64-Slice Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosing Acute Coronary Syndromes and Predicting Clinical Outcome in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain of Uncertain Origin , 2007, Circulation.

[35]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, American heart journal.

[36]  B. Koo,et al.  Effects of Nitroglycerin on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Electrocardiogram-gated Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[37]  M. Schull,et al.  The risk of missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction associated with emergency department volume. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[38]  P. Fenster,et al.  Suppression of ventricular ectopy with intravenous metoprolol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 1984, Critical care medicine.

[39]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  C. Wittram How I do it: CT pulmonary angiography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  G. Raff,et al.  Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement at biphasic single-injection 64-section CT angiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[42]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[43]  Brian O'Neil,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[44]  R Ruthazer,et al.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  P. Fenster,et al.  Suppression of Atrial Ectopy with Intravenous Metoprolol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients , 1983, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[46]  E. Halpern,et al.  Evaluation of a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol: use of 64-Section CT in low-to-moderate risk emergency department patients suspected of having acute coronary syndrome. , 2008, Radiology.

[47]  Shaoxiong Zhang,et al.  Comparison of image quality and arterial enhancement with a dedicated coronary CTA protocol versus a triple rule-out coronary CTA protocol. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[48]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[49]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[50]  Michael J Doyle,et al.  Malpractice claims against emergency physicians in Massachusetts: 1975-1993. , 1996, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[51]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Is There a Relation between Non-Calcifying Coronary Plaques and Acute Coronary Syndromes? A Retrospective Study Using Multislice Computed Tomography , 2007, Cardiology.

[52]  J. Singer,et al.  Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[53]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[54]  L. Washington,et al.  CT for thromboembolic disease. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[55]  S. Werns,et al.  Emergency Cardiac CT for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Coronary, Pulmonary, and Aortic Image Quality , 2009 .

[56]  S. Hailpern,et al.  Beta-blockers are associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction after cocaine use. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[57]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[58]  H. Selker,et al.  Acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: diagnostic characteristics, tests, and challenges. , 2005, Cardiology clinics.

[59]  E. Halpern,et al.  Radiation dose in a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[60]  J. Remy,et al.  Spiral CT angiography of the pulmonary circulation. , 1999, Radiology.

[61]  R. Khare,et al.  Diagnostic uncertainty and costs associated with current emergency department evaluation of low risk chest pain. , 2008, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[62]  Tianxi Cai,et al.  Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[63]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[64]  B. Hamm,et al.  Multislice CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Sublingual Nitroglycerine on the Diameter of Coronary Arteries , 2006, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.