Team decision problems with classical and quantum signals

We study team decision problems where communication is not possible, but coordination among team members can be realized via signals in a shared environment. We consider a variety of decision problems that differ in what team members know about one another's actions and knowledge. For each type of decision problem, we investigate how different assumptions on the available signals affect team performance. Specifically, we consider the cases of perfectly correlated, i.i.d., and exchangeable classical signals, as well as the case of quantum signals. We find that, whereas in perfect-recall trees (Kuhn 1950 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 36, 570–576; Kuhn 1953 In Contributions to the theory of games, vol. II (eds H Kuhn, A Tucker), pp. 193–216) no type of signal improves performance, in imperfect-recall trees quantum signals may bring an improvement. Isbell (Isbell 1957 In Contributions to the theory of games, vol. III (eds M Drescher, A Tucker, P Wolfe), pp. 79–96) proved that, in non-Kuhn trees, classical i.i.d. signals may improve performance. We show that further improvement may be possible by use of classical exchangeable or quantum signals. We include an example of the effect of quantum signals in the context of high-frequency trading.

[1]  R. Cleve,et al.  Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies , 2004 .

[2]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[3]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum nonlocality as an axiom , 1994 .

[4]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  The relationship between quantum and classical correlation in games , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall , 1996, TARK.

[7]  Ehud Lehrer,et al.  Signaling and Mediation in Games with Common Interests , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[8]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[9]  J. Norris Appendix: probability and measure , 1997 .

[10]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.

[11]  Jane Qiu,et al.  Quantum communications leap out of the lab , 2014, Nature.

[12]  V. Scarani,et al.  The security of practical quantum key distribution , 2008, 0802.4155.

[13]  J. R. Isbell 3. FINITARY GAMES , 1958 .

[14]  Vladislav Kargin,et al.  On coordination games with quantum correlations , 2008, Int. J. Game Theory.

[15]  Ted Temzelides Modeling the act of measurement in the social sciences , 2010 .

[16]  Simon C. Benjamin,et al.  Multiplayer quantum games , 2001 .

[17]  O. Arenz Extensive Games , 2012 .

[18]  Z. Merali Physics. Quantum mechanics braces for the ultimate test. , 2011, Science.

[19]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality , 2011, 1102.0264.

[20]  John Calsamiglia,et al.  Quantum entanglement, indistinguishability, and the absent-minded driver's problem , 2005 .

[21]  W. Rindler,et al.  Introduction to special relativity , 1982 .

[22]  H. W. Kuhn,et al.  11. Extensive Games and the Problem of Information , 1953 .

[23]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process , 1980 .

[24]  Shmuel Zamir,et al.  Type Indeterminacy: A Model for the KT(Kahneman-Tversky)-Man , 2006, physics/0604166.

[25]  A D Wissner-Gross,et al.  Relativistic statistical arbitrage. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  R. Radner,et al.  Economic theory of teams , 1972 .

[27]  Thomas Philippon,et al.  Competing on Speed , 2011 .

[28]  A. Fine Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities , 1982 .

[29]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  A Note on Kuhn's Theorem ∗ , 2007 .

[30]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[31]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Correlated Equilibria of Classical Strategic Games with Quantum Signals , 2003, ArXiv.

[32]  D. Meyer Quantum strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9804010.

[33]  Sergiu Hart,et al.  Games in extensive and strategic forms , 1992 .

[34]  Noah Linden,et al.  Connection between Bell nonlocality and Bayesian game theory , 2012, Nature Communications.

[35]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Quantum games , 2000 .

[36]  L. Hardy,et al.  Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[37]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Quantum mysteries refined , 1994 .

[38]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness , 1996 .

[39]  D. Deutsch,et al.  Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[40]  J. Schreiber Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[41]  Robert Wilson Computing Equilibria of Two-Person Games from the Extensive Form , 1972 .

[42]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Projective expected utility: a subjective formulation , 2008, TARK '09.

[43]  Stefan Weigert,et al.  Quantum correlation games , 2003 .

[44]  J. S. BELLt Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .

[45]  Steven Weinstein,et al.  Is the Brain a Quantum Computer? , 2006, Cogn. Sci..