Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples

We measure the other-regarding behavior in samples from three related populations in the upper Midwest of the United States: college students, non-student adults from the community surrounding the college, and adult trainee truckers in a residential training program. The use of typical experimental economics recruitment procedures made the first two groups substantially self-selected. Because the context reduced the opportunity cost of participating dramatically, 91 % of the adult trainees solicited participated, leaving little scope for self-selection in this sample. We find no differences in the elicited other-regarding preferences between the self-selected adults and the adult trainees, suggesting that selection is unlikely to bias inferences about the prevalence of other-regarding preferences among non-student adult subjects. Our data also reject the more specific hypothesis that approval-seeking subjects are the ones most likely to select into experiments. Finally, we observe a large difference between self-selected college students and self-selected adults: the students appear considerably less pro-social.

[1]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  On Representative Social Capital , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Michael Kosfeld,et al.  Conditional Cooperation and Costly Monitoring Explain Success in Forest Commons Management , 2010, Science.

[3]  Daniel John Zizzo,et al.  Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments , 2008 .

[4]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Using Behavioral Economic Field Experiments at a Firm , 2008 .

[5]  Christopher J Patrick,et al.  Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. , 2002, Psychological assessment.

[6]  Jan Stoop,et al.  From the Lab to the Field: Cooperation among Fishermen , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Benedikt Herrmann,et al.  Measuring conditional cooperation: a replication study in Russia , 2009 .

[8]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments , 2000 .

[9]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .

[10]  A. Soest,et al.  Experts in experiments , 2012, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.

[11]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment , 2001 .

[12]  Armin Falk,et al.  Do Lab Experiments Misrepresent Social Preferences? The Case of Self-Selected Student Samples , 2013 .

[13]  Michèle Belot,et al.  Who should be called to the lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games , 2010 .

[14]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Comparing Students to Workers: The Effects of Social Framing on Behavior in Distribution Games , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  Colin Camerer,et al.  When Does "Economic Man" Dominate Social Behavior? , 2006, Science.

[16]  Wolfgang J. Luhan,et al.  Cedex Discussion Paper Series , 2022 .

[17]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Risk Attitudes, Randomization to Treatment, and Self-Selection into Experiments , 2005 .

[18]  Werner Güth,et al.  Bargaining Outside the Lab a Newspaper Experiment of a Three-Person Ultimatum Game , 2005 .

[19]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Ralph Hertwig,et al.  Grandparental investment: past, present, and future. , 2010, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[21]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  J. Guzmán.  Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[23]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Are people conditionally cooperative , 2000 .

[24]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Do Social Preferences Increase Productivity? Field Experimental Evidence from Fishermen in Toyama Bay , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[26]  Christian Thöni,et al.  Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence , 2004 .

[27]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  On Representative Trust , 2003 .

[28]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. , 2005 .

[29]  A. Soest,et al.  Experts in experiments , 2012 .

[30]  An Introduction to Bucket Auctions ( for Charity ) ∗ , 2010 .

[31]  Lorenz Goette,et al.  Performance Pay and the Erosion of Worker Cooperation: Field Experimental Evidence , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  Fredrik W. Andersson,et al.  The Analysis of Firms and Employees: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches: Front matter, acknowledgments, table of contents , 2008 .

[33]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[34]  Using Artefactual Field Experiments to Learn about the Incentives for Sustainable Forest Use in Developing Economies , 2011 .

[35]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1976 .

[36]  Stephen V. Burks,et al.  Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment , 2009 .

[37]  John A. List,et al.  Young, Selfish and Male: Field Evidence of Social Preferences , 2004 .

[38]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Hidden Costs and Returns of Incentives - Trust and Trustworthiness Among CEOS , 2004 .

[39]  Erik Wengström,et al.  Selection and Mode Effects in Risk Preference Elicitation Experiments , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[40]  E. Fehr,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[41]  J. Morgan,et al.  Who's Naughty? Who's Nice? Social Preferences in Online Industries , 2011 .

[42]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment , 2008 .

[43]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[44]  Peter Hans Matthews,et al.  Why Punish? Social reciprocity and the enforcement of prosocial norms , 2004 .

[45]  Michael I. Norton.  THE HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL. , 1908, Science.

[46]  ปิยดา สมบัติวัฒนา.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2013 .

[47]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Charity Auctions: A Field Experimental Investigation , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[48]  Groups, Commons and Regulations: Experiments with Villagers and Students in Colombia , 2005 .

[49]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Is There Selection Bias in Laboratory Experiments? , 2010 .

[50]  Psychology, rationality and economic behaviour : challenging standard assumptions , 2005 .

[51]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Artifact in behavioral research , 1969 .

[52]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments , 2009 .

[53]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Conditional cooperation on three continents , 2008 .

[54]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[55]  S. Gächter,et al.  Who Makes a Good Leader? Cooperativeness, Optimism, and Leading‐By‐Example , 2012 .

[56]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[57]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .