Correlation between angiographic stenosis and physiologic venous sinus outflow obstruction in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Introduction The relationship between degree of angiographic venous sinus stenosis and the trans-stenosis pressure gradient magnitude in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is poorly understood. The present study aimed to assess the utility of angiography, venography, and non-invasive imaging (MRV or CTV) for the diagnosis and characterization of clinically significant VSS. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed to identify patients with medically refractory IIH who were evaluated by angiography and venous manometry for the presence of VSS with associated clinically significant pressure gradient. Angiographic stenosis was measured by two independent raters using novel methodology. Results Thirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria for the study. In total, 70% of patients had clinically significant pressure gradients and were selected for stenting. The optimal percentage stenosis for detection of a significant pressure gradient was 34% stenosis on venous phase arteriography (sensitivity 0.81 and specificity 0.91) and 31% stenosis on venography (0.92 and 0.73). For every 10% increase in stenosis, an approximate increase in pressure gradient of 3.5 mmHg is seen. MRV/CTV had a calculated sensitivity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 22%. Conclusion The degree of stenosis predictive of a clinically significant pressure gradient (30–35%) in the venous sinuses is considerably lower than the arterial stenosis at which pathologic hemodynamic alterations occur. While highly predictive of a venous pressure gradient when a stenosis is identified, non-invasive imaging does not appear to be a suitable diagnostic evaluation for the purpose of ruling out clinically significant cerebral VSS.

[1]  P. Subramanian,et al.  Venous sinus stenting is a valuable treatment for fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Patsalides,et al.  Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Results of a Prospective Trial , 2017, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[3]  C. Durst,et al.  Venous sinus stenting for reduction of intracranial pressure in IIH: a prospective pilot study. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  James E. Johnson,et al.  Anatomical Variations of the Transverse‐Sigmoid Sinus Junction: Implications for Endovascular Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension , 2016, Anatomical record.

[5]  A. Dogan,et al.  Dural venous sinus angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension , 2011, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[6]  Beau B. Bruce,et al.  Clinical course of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with transverse sinus stenosis , 2013, Neurology.

[7]  Ching-Jen Chen,et al.  Transient resolution of venous sinus stenosis after high-volume lumbar puncture in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  B. Schaller,et al.  Physiology of cerebral venous blood flow: from experimental data in animals to normal function in humans , 2004, Brain Research Reviews.

[9]  C Y Wang,et al.  Flow through Collapsible Tubes at High Reynolds Numbers , 1981, Circulation research.

[10]  D. Nicolle,et al.  Unilateral Transverse Sinus Stenting of Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  M. Kalani,et al.  Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not associated with cortical venous occlusion , 2015, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[12]  K. Fargen,et al.  Venous waveform morphological changes associated with treatment of symptomatic venous sinus stenosis , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[13]  S. Raju,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound scan evaluation of the obstructed vein. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  G. M. Halmágyi,et al.  Transverse Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Review of 52 Patients and of Model Predictions , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  H. Rekate,et al.  Intracranial venous sinus stenting for benign intracranial hypertension: clinical indications, technique, and preliminary results. , 2011, World neurosurgery.

[16]  P. Subramanian,et al.  Visual and Neurological Outcomes Following Endovascular Stenting for Pseudotumor Cerebri Associated With Transverse Sinus Stenosis , 2013, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[17]  I. Crassard,et al.  Stenting of the Lateral Sinus in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension According to the Type of Stenosis , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[18]  A. Ducruet,et al.  Long-term patency of venous sinus stents for idiopathic intracranial hypertension , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[19]  J D Pickard,et al.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: 12 cases treated by venous sinus stenting , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  C. R. Goodwin,et al.  Risk factors for failed transverse sinus stenting in pseudotumor cerebri patients , 2014, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[21]  P. Pappas,et al.  Criteria for defining significant central vein stenosis with duplex ultrasound. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  S. Raju,et al.  Venous outflow obstruction: An underestimated contributor to chronic venous disease. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  A. Lumsden,et al.  Iliac vein stenting for chronic venous insufficiency. , 2007, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[24]  H. Onder,et al.  Reversible transverse sinus collapse in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension , 2015, BMJ Case Reports.

[25]  O. Ganslandt,et al.  Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results in 51 patients , 2017, Neuroradiology.