The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning

Although research has suggested that group composition plays an important role in collaborative learning, the role of motivation in group composition has rarely been taken into account. This study investigates the effects of group composition of self-efficacy (e.g. low, high, and mixed self-efficacy) on group motivation (i.e. collective efficacy), collaborative learning behavior, and performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. The results indicate that high self-efficacy groups have higher collective efficacy beliefs than low self-efficacy groups. Furthermore, high self-efficacy groups use more high-level cognitive skills during group discussion than low self-efficacy groups, despite no significant difference in usage of lowlevel cognitive skills among the three groups. This study also demonstrates that collective efficacy has positive effects on discussion behaviors and group performance. Students with higher collective efficacy not only use more high-level cognitive skills in group discussion, but also demonstrate better academic performance. Our research further indicates that students' use of high-level cognitive skills in group discussion has positive effects on group performance. Finally, implications and suggestions for future research are also provided.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Comparison of Three Theoretically Derived Variables in Predicting Career and Academic Behavior: Self-Efficacy, Interest Congruence, and Consequence Thinking. , 1987 .

[3]  R. Goddard,et al.  Collective efficacy : A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement , 2001 .

[4]  R. Land,et al.  Assigning Students in Group Work Projects. Can We Do Better than Random? , 2000 .

[5]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[7]  J. Graydon,et al.  The impact of collective efficacy beliefs on effort and persistence in a group task. , 1999, Journal of sports sciences.

[8]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[9]  Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Mathematical Problem-Solving of Gifted Students , 1996, Contemporary educational psychology.

[10]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Collective efficacy and group performance. , 1992 .

[11]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success , 2002 .

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone , 1999 .

[13]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Design of a networked portfolio system , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[15]  M. M. Chemers,et al.  Collective Efficacy: A Multilevel Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[17]  A. Bandura.  Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[18]  M. Burgin,et al.  Technology in education , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[19]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics , 1998 .

[20]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[22]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  A process‐outcome analysis of learning in group and individual settings , 1980 .

[23]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[24]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Failures in self-regulation: Energy depletion or selective disengagement? , 1996 .

[25]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  The Design and Activation of Self-Regulating Work Groups , 1987 .

[26]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. , 2002 .

[27]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[29]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[30]  L. Fuchs,et al.  High-Achieving Students’ Interactions and Performance on Complex Mathematical Tasks as a Function of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Pairings , 1998 .

[31]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[32]  Yu-chen Hsu.  Evaluation Theory in Problem-Based Learning Approach. , 1999 .

[33]  Amy E. Randel,et al.  Understanding Group Efficacy , 2000 .

[34]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effects of Leader Role, Team-Set Goal Difficulty, Efficacy, and Tactics on Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[35]  M. Bong,et al.  Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction , 2000 .

[36]  Lawrence J. Leonard.  From Indignation to Indifference: Teacher Concerns About Externally Imposed Classroom Interruptions , 2001 .

[37]  Dennis C. Brown.  Cognitive and affective minds: A necessary marriage in criminal justice education , 2001 .

[38]  Erika D Peterson,et al.  Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups , 2000 .

[39]  J. Gillon,et al.  Group dynamics , 1996 .

[40]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Social interdependence: interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[41]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Cooperative CBI: The Effects of Heterogeneous versus Homogeneous Grouping on the Learning of Progressively Complex Concepts , 1988 .

[42]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[43]  Pheobe Palmieri,et al.  Technology in Education...Do We Need It , 1997 .

[44]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs and General Mental Ability in Mathematical Problem-Solving , 1995 .

[45]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Role of Self-Efficacy and General Mental Ability in Mathematical Problem-Solving: A Path Analysis. , 1995 .

[46]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Technology in education (introduction) , 1993, CACM.

[47]  C. Pearson.  Participative Goal Setting as a Strategy for Improving Performance and Job Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Evaluation with Railway Track Maintenance Gangs , 1987 .

[48]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[49]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[50]  B. Little,et al.  The Relationship between Collective Efficacy and Performance in Manufacturing Work Teams , 1997 .

[51]  Terence C. Ahern,et al.  Improving the Instructional Congruency of a Computer-Mediated Small-Group Discussion , 2000 .

[52]  M. Azmitia.  Peer Interaction and Problem Solving: When Are Two Heads Better Than One?. , 1988 .

[53]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning and Social Interdependence Theory , 2002 .

[54]  Simon Hooper,et al.  The Effects of Aptitude Composition on Achievement during Small Group Learning , 1989 .

[55]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Problem Solving: Implications of Using Different Forms of Assessment , 1997 .