Identifying the sources of the pulse artefact in EEG recordings made inside an MR scanner

EEG recordings made during concurrent fMRI are confounded by the pulse artefact (PA), which although smaller than the gradient artefact is often more problematic because of its variability over multiple cardiac cycles. A better understanding of the PA is needed in order to generate improved methods for reducing its effect in EEG–fMRI experiments. Here we performed a study aimed at identifying the relative contributions of three putative sources of the PA (cardiac-pulse-driven head rotation, the Hall effect due to pulsatile blood flow and pulse-driven expansion of the scalp) to its amplitude and variability. EEG recordings were made from 6 subjects lying in a 3 T scanner. Accelerometers were fixed on the forehead and temple to monitor head motion. A bite-bar and vacuum cushion were used to restrain the head, thus greatly attenuating the contribution of cardiac-driven head rotation to the PA, while an insulating layer placed between the head and the EEG electrodes was used to eliminate the Hall voltage contribution. Using the root mean square (RMS) amplitude of the PA averaged over leads and time as a measure of the PA amplitude, we found that head restraint and insulating layer reduced the PA by 61% and 42%, respectively, when compared with the PA induced with the subject relaxed, indicating that cardiac-pulse-driven head rotation is the dominant source of the PA. With both the insulating layer and head restraint in place, the PA was reduced in RMS amplitude by 78% compared with the relaxed condition, the remaining PA contribution resulting from scalp expansion or residual head motion. The variance of the PA across cardiac cycles was more strongly reduced by the insulating layer than the head restraint, indicating that the flow-induced Hall voltage makes a larger contribution than pulse-driven head rotation to the variability of the PA.

[1]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Engel,et al.  Single-trial EEG–fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Functional imaging of sleep vertex sharp transients , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Studying spontaneous EEG activity with fMRI , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[5]  T F Budinger,et al.  Cardiovascular alterations in Macaca monkeys exposed to stationary magnetic fields: experimental observations and theoretical analysis. , 1983, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  A. Villringer,et al.  Simultaneous EEG–fMRI , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  W. Orrison,et al.  Functional Brain Imaging , 1995 .

[8]  Afraim Salek-Haddadi,et al.  Simultaneous EEG-Correlated Ictal fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Winston X. Yan,et al.  Physical modeling of pulse artefact sources in simultaneous EEG/fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  Recording of electrical brain activity in a magnetic resonance environment: Distorting effects of the static magnetic field , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Christian Kaufmann,et al.  Altered Processing of Acoustic Stimuli during Sleep: Reduced Auditory Activation and Visual Deactivation Detected by a Combined fMRI/EEG Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Understanding gradient artefacts in simultaneous EEG/fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Debener,et al.  Properties of the ballistocardiogram artefact as revealed by EEG recordings at 1.5, 3 and 7 T static magnetic field strength. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  Karen J. Mullinger,et al.  Reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS): A novel method of minimizing EEG artefacts during simultaneous fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological recording , 1995 .

[18]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Simultaneous EEG source localisation and artifact rejection during concurrent fMRI by means of spatial filtering , 2008, NeuroImage.

[19]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneously with 3-T fMRI: Removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  Graeme D. Jackson,et al.  Measurement and reduction of motion and ballistocardiogram artefacts from simultaneous EEG and fMRI recordings , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Complete artifact removal for EEG recorded during continuous fMRI using independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Peter G. Morris,et al.  fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: Characterising BOLD signal changes , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Masato Yumoto,et al.  Reduction of ballistocardiogram with a vacuum head-fixating system during simultaneous fMRI and multi-channel monopolar EEG recording , 2002 .

[25]  A. Boxtel,et al.  Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. , 2001 .

[26]  M. Roth,et al.  Single‐trial analysis of oddball event‐related potentials in simultaneous EEG‐fMRI , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Manuel Abbafati,et al.  An independent component analysis-based approach on ballistocardiogram artifact removing. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Motion and Ballistocardiogram Artifact Removal for Interleaved Recording of EEG and EPs during MRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Realignment parameter-informed artefact correction for simultaneous EEG–fMRI recordings , 2009, NeuroImage.