Total Fuel-Cycle Emissions for Marine Vessels : A Well-to-Hull Analysis with Case Study 13 th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering , LCE 2006

Regional and global air pollution emissions from marine transportation is a growing concern. In discerning the sources of such pollution, researchers have become interested in tracking where along the total fuel cycle these emissions occur. In addition, new efforts to introduce alternative fuels in marine vessels have raised new questions about the energy use and environmental impacts of such fuels. To address these issues, this paper presents the Total Energy & Emissions Analysis for Marine Systems (TEAMS) model. TEAMS can be used to analyze total fuel-cycle emissions and energy use from marine vessels. TEAMS captures “well-to-hull” emissions—that is, emissions along the entire fuel pathway, including extraction, processing, distribution, and use in vessels. TEAMS conducts analyses for six fuel pathways: (1) petroleum to residual oil; (2) petroleum to conventional diesel; (3) petroleum to low-sulfur diesel; (4) natural gas to compressed natural gas; (5) natural gas to Fischer-Tropsch diesel; and, (6) soybeans to biodiesel. TEAMS calculates total fuel-cycle emissions of three greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) and five criteria pollutants (volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters of 10 micrometers or less, and sulfur oxides). TEAMS also calculates total energy consumption, fossil fuel consumption, and petroleum consumption associated with each of its six fuel cycles. TEAMS can be used to study emissions from a variety of user-defined vessels. This paper provides modeling results for a passenger ferry case study using alternative fuels.

[1]  Michael Wang,et al.  Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems — A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions , 2005 .

[2]  M. Q. Wang,et al.  GREET 1.0 -- Transportation fuel cycles model: Methodology and use , 1996 .

[3]  Lo Yin Chan,et al.  The effect of commuting microenvironment on commuter exposures to vehicular emission in Hong Kong , 1999 .

[4]  Michael Wang,et al.  Fuel Ethanol Produced from Midwest U.S. Corn: Help or Hindrance to the Vision of Kyoto? , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Optimal Fleetwide Emissions Reductions for Passenger Ferries: An Application of a Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Model for the New York–New Jersey Harbor , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  James J. Winebrake,et al.  Toxic Emissions from Mobile Sources: A Total Fuel-Cycle Analysis for Conventional and Alternative Fuel Vehicles , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  H. S. Huang,et al.  A full fuel-cycle analysis of energy and emissions impacts of transportation fuels produced from natural gas , 2000 .

[8]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Emissions from Ships , 1997, Science.

[9]  James J. Corbett,et al.  COMPARING AIR POLLUTION FROM FERRY AND LANDSIDE COMMUTING , 2003 .

[10]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Controlling Air Pollution from Passenger Ferries: Cost-Effectiveness of Seven Technological Options , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  M. Q. Wang,et al.  GREET 1.5 - transportation fuel-cycle model - Vol. 2 : appendices of data and results. , 1999 .

[12]  A K Gupta,et al.  Emissions of Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants in a Port and Harbour Region in India , 2002, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[13]  James J. Corbett,et al.  MITIGATING AIR POLLUTION IMPACTS OF PASSENGER FERRIES , 2002 .

[14]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Emissions from Waterborne Commerce Vessels in United States Continental and Inland Waterways , 2000 .