Do exercise‐induced increases in muscle size contribute to strength in resistance‐trained individuals?

Previous work in non‐resistance‐trained individuals has found that an increase in muscle size has no additive effect on changes in strength. However, it is thought that muscle growth is of increased importance for resistance‐trained individuals.

[1]  T. Abe,et al.  Assessing differential responders and mean changes in muscle size, strength, and the cross-over effect to two distinct resistance training protocols. , 2020, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[2]  T. Abe,et al.  The Basics of Training for Muscle Size and Strength: A Brief Review on the Theory. , 2020, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  T. Abe,et al.  The contraction history of the muscle and strength change: lessons learned from unilateral training models , 2020, Physiological measurement.

[4]  T. Abe,et al.  Blood flow restriction does not augment low force contractions taken to or near task failure , 2019, European journal of sport science.

[5]  T. Abe,et al.  Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Size do not Contribute to Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Strength , 2019, Sports Medicine.

[6]  T. Abe,et al.  Ultrasound and MRI measured changes in muscle mass gives different estimates but similar conclusions: a Bayesian approach , 2019, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[7]  Christopher B. Taber,et al.  Exercise-Induced Myofibrillar Hypertrophy is a Contributory Cause of Gains in Muscle Strength , 2019, Sports Medicine.

[8]  Herbert Hoijtink,et al.  A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. , 2019, Psychological methods.

[9]  T. Abe,et al.  Changes in muscle size via MRI and ultrasound: Are they equivalent? , 2018, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[10]  J. Loenneke,et al.  Practicing the Test Produces Strength Equivalent to Higher Volume Training , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Takashi Abe,et al.  Muscle adaptations following 21 consecutive days of strength test familiarization compared with traditional training , 2017, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  Jonathan P. Folland,et al.  Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training , 2017, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  J. Loenneke,et al.  The problem Of muscle hypertrophy: Revisited , 2016, Muscle & nerve.

[14]  C. Ugrinowitsch,et al.  An inability to distinguish edematous swelling from true hypertrophy still prevents a completely accurate interpretation of the time course of muscle hypertrophy , 2016, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[15]  C. Ugrinowitsch,et al.  Early adaptations to six weeks of non-periodized and periodized strength training regimens in recreational males. , 2014, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[16]  J. Folland,et al.  The contribution of muscle hypertrophy to strength changes following resistance training , 2014, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[17]  K. Häkkinen,et al.  Changes in muscle hypertrophy in women with periodized resistance training. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  D G Sale,et al.  Neural adaptation to resistance training. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  M. Stone,et al.  A hypothetical model for strength training. , 1981, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[20]  T. Moritani,et al.  Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. , 1979, American journal of physical medicine.

[21]  G. Kamen,et al.  Neural Adaptations to Resistive Exercise , 2006, Sports medicine.

[22]  Michael H. Stone,et al.  A Theoretical Model of Strength Training , 1982 .